Do above-ground growth dynamics of poplar change with time under CO 2 enrichment?

New Phytologist

Volumn 160, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 305-318

  Calfapietra, Carlo ^a   Gielen, Birgit ^b   Sabatti, Maurizio ^a   De Angelis, Paolo ^a   Miglietta, Franco ^c   Scarascia Mugnozza, Giuseppe ^a   Ceulemans, Reinhart ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Competition; Elevated CO2; Free air CO2 enrichment (FACE); Growth; Populus; Short rotation culture

Indexed keywords

ABOVEGROUND PRODUCTION; CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); GROWTH;

POPULUS; POPULUS ALBA; POPULUS BEROLINENSIS; POPULUS EURAMERICANA; POPULUS NIGRA;

EID: 0142185121     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00899.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. 2-induced growth enhancements of co-occurring tree species decline at different rates. Oecologia 96: 478-482.
2. Beaton A, Thompson D, Webber J. 1991. British poplar-a 21st century challenge. Forestry and British Timber August: 19-21.
3. 2 enrichment (PopFACE) during the first growth cycle and immediately following coppice. New Phytologist 159: 609-621.
4. 2 and hybrid poplar: a detailed investigation of root and shoot growth and physiology of P. euramericana 'Primo'. Forest Ecology and Management 74: 103-116.
5. Brown KR. 1991. Carbon dioxide enrichment accelerates the decline in nutrient status and relative growth rate of Populus tremuloides Michx. seedlings. Tree Physiology 8: 161-173.
6. 2 enrichment (FACE) enhances biomass production in a short-rotation poplar plantation (POPFACE). Tree Physiology 23: 805-814.
7. Calfapietra C, Gielen B, Sabatti M, De Angelis P, Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Ceulemans R. 2001. Growth performance of Populus exposed to 'Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment' during the first growing season in the POPFACE experiment. Annals of Forest Science 58: 819-828.
8. Castellani E, Freccero V, Lapietra GF. 1967. Proposta di una scala di differenziazione delle gemme fogliari del pioppo utile per gli interventi antiparassitari. Giornale Botanico Italiano 101: 355-360.
9. 2): an early, short-term response? Global Change Biology 5: 623-633.
10. Ceulemans R, Deraedt W. 1999. Production physiology and growth potential of poplars under short-rotation forestry culture. Forest Ecology and Management 121: 9-23.
11. Ceulemans R, Impens I, Mau F, van Hecke P, Chen SG. 1992. Dry mass production and solar radiation conversion efficiency of poplar clones. In: Grassi G, Collina A, Zibetta H, eds. Biomass for Energy, Industry and Environment: 6th E.C. Conference. London, UK: Elsevier, 157-163.
12. 2 on growth, biomass production and nitrogen allocation of two Populus clones. Journal of Biogeography 22: 261-268.
13. 2 on woody plants. New Phytologist 127: 425-446.
14. 2 on leaf area-growth and carbon gain physiology in Populus x euramericana (Dode) Guinier. New Phytologist 129: 253-263.
15. 2 enrichment. Science 284: 1177-1179.
16. 3 enrichment (FACE) project: An overview. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. General Technical Report NC-214.
17. Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J. 1994. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263: 185-189.
18. 2 concentration on natural and commercial temperate trees and forests. Advances in Ecological Research 19: 2-55.
19. El Kohen A, Venet L, Mousseau M. 1993. Growth and photosynthesis of two deciduous forest tree species exposed to elevated carbon dioxide. Functional Ecology 7: 480-486.
20. Evans GC. 1972. Relative growth rate. In: Anderson DJ, Greigh-Smith P, Pitelka FA, eds. The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 246-254.
21. 2 enrichment (POPFACE), through increased cell expansion and production. Plant, Cell & Environment 24: 305-316.
22. Ford ED. 1976. Competition, genetic systems and improvement of forest yield. In: Cannell MGR, Last FT, eds. Tree physiology and yield improvement. London, UK: Academic Press, 463-472.
23. 14C distribution. Tree Physiology 8: 109-119.
24. Galinski W, Goosens R, Ceulemans R, Impens I. 1991. The wood productivity of two poplar tones (Populus trichocarpa x Populus deltoides) as affected by stocking and age. Biomass Bioenergy 1: 233-239.
25. 2. New Phytologist 131: 81-90.
26. 2 enrichment (POPFACE). New Phytologist 153: 91-100.
27. Gielen B, Calfapietra C, Sabatti M, Ceulemans R. 2001. Leaf area dynamics in a closed poplar plantation under free-air carbon dioxide enrichment. Tree Physiology 21: 1245-1255.
28. 2 enrichment (POPFACE) only slightly affect profiles of light and leaf characteristics in closed canopies of Populus. Global Change Biology 9: 1022-1037.
29. Hansen EA. 1991. Poplar woody biomass yields: a look to the future. Biomass and Bioenergy 1: 1-7.
30. Hegyi F. 1974. A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands. In: Fries J, ed. Growth models for tree and stand simulation. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal College of Forestry. 74-90.
31. Hendrey GR, Lewin KF, Nagy J. 1993. Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment: development, progress, results. Vegetatio 104/105: 17-31.
32. Holmes MJ, Reed DD. 1991. Competition indexes for mixed species northern hardwoods. Forest Science 37: 1338-1349.
33. Hunt R. 1982. Plant growth curves: the functional approach to plant growth analysis. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
34. 2 enrichment of sour orange trees: 2.5 years into a long-term experiment. Plant, Cell & Environment 14: 351-353.
35. Isebrands JG, McDonald EP, Kruger E, Hendrey G, Pregitzer K, Percy K, Sober J, Karnosky DF. 2001. Growth responses of Populus tremuloides clones to interacting carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone. Environmental Pollution 115: 359-371.
36. 2 and Temperature. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Jarvis PG, Jarvis MS. 1964. Growth rates of woody plants. Physiologia Plantarum 17: 654-666.
38. 2 concentrations and photoperiods. Tree Physiology 16: 367-373.
39. 2 in poplar. Photosynthetica 33: 51-61.
40. 3. Oecologia 128: 237-250.
41. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.
42. MacPherson G. 1995. Home-grown energy from short-rotation coppice. Ipswich, UK: Farming Press Books.
43. Madgwick HAI. 1971. The accuracy and precision of estimates of the dry matter in stems, branches, and foliage in an old-field Pinus virginiana stand. In: Young HE, ed. Forest Biomass Studies. Orono, ME, US: University Main Press, 105-112.
44. 3 in aggrading aspen stands. Functional Ecology 16: 792-801.
45. 2 enrichment (FACE) of a poplar plantation: the POPFACE fumigation system. New Phytologist 150: 465-476.
46. 2 and temperature. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 94-125.
47. 2, nutrition and climatic warming on bud phenology in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) and their impact on the risk of frost damage. Tree Physiology 14: 691-706.
48. 2-enriched sweetgum stand. New Phytologist 150: 477-487.
49. 2 and the implications for forests. In: Koch GW, Mooney HA, eds. Carbon dioxide and terrestrial ecosystem. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 1-21.
50. 2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 683-714.
51. 2-enriched atmosphere. New Phytologist 131: 91-97.
52. Oechel WC, Strain BR. 1985. Native species responses to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. In: Strain BR, Cure JD, eds. Direct effects of increasing carbon dioxide on vegetation. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Carbon Dioxide Research Division, Springfield, Washington DC, USA, 117-154.
53. 3-enriched atmospheres. Nature 420: 403-407.
54. Perry DA. 1985. The competition process in forest stands. In: Cannell MGR, Jackson JE, eds. Trees as crop plants. Natural Environment Research Council, UK: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, 481-506.
55. Piutti E, Cescatti A. 1997. A quantirative analysis of the interactions between climatic response and intraspecific competition in European beech. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 277-284.
56. Pontailler JY, Ceulemans R, Guittet J, Mau F. 1997. Linear and non-linear functions of Volume index to estimate woody biomass in high density young poplar stands. Annual Science of Forestry 54: 335-345.
57. 2 concentration. Vegetatio 104/105: 77-97.
58. 2: a search for functional types. In: Körner C, Bazzaz FA, eds. Carbon dioxide, populations, and communities. London, UK: Academic Press Inc., 375-412.
59. 2, soil nitrogen and turnover of fine roots. New Phytologist 129: 579-585.
60. 2 enrichment on four poplar clones. I. Growth and leaf anatomy. Annals of Botany 65: 617-626.
61. Remphrey WR, Powell GR. 1985. Crown architecture of Larix laricina saplings: sylleptic branching on the main stem. Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 1296-1302.
62. Rey A, Jarvis PG. 1997. Growth response of young birch trees (Betula pendula Roth.). In: Mohren GMJ, Kramer K, Sabaté S, eds. Impacts of global change on tree physiology and forest ecosystems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 207-212.
63. 2 atmosphere. New Phytologist 139: 395-436.
64. Scarascia-Mugnozza GE, Ceulemans R, Heilman PE, Isebrands JG, Stettler RF, Hinckley TM. 1997. Production physiology and morphology of Populus species and their hybrids grown under short rotation. II. Biomass components and harvest index of hybrid and parental species clones. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 285-294.
65. Scarascia-Mugnozza G, DeAngelis P, Sabatti M, Calfapietra C, Ceulemans R, Peressotti A, Miglietta F. 2000. A FACE experiment on short rotation, intensive poplar plantation: objective and experimental set up of POPFACE. In: Sutton MA, Moreno JM, van der Putten WH, Struwe S, eds. Terrestrial ecosystem research in europe: successes, challenges and policy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 136-140.
66. Schimel D, Alves D, Enting D, Heimann M, Joos F. 1996. Radiative forcing of climate change. In: Houghton JT, Filho LGM, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K, eds. Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 65-132.
67. 2) and nutrient status modified leaf phenology and growth rhythm of young Populus trichocarpa trees in a three-year field study. Trees 15: 403-413.
68. Soares P, Tomé M. 1996. Changes in eucalypt plantations structure, variability and relative growth rate pattern under different intraspecific competition gradients. In: Skovsgaard JP, Johannsen VK, eds. Modelling Regeneration Success and Early Growth of Forest Stands, Proceedings from the IUFRO Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, 270-284.
69. 2 concentration in the field. Annals of Forest Science 56: 493-500.
70. Tomé M, Burkhart HE. 1989. Distance-dependent competition measures for predicting growth of individual trees. Forest Science 35: 816-831.
71. Tomé M, Tomé JA, Araújo MC, Pereira JS. 1994. Intraspecific competition in irrigated and fertilized eucalypt plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 69: 211-218.
72. Verwijst T. 1991. Logarithmic transformations in biomass estimation procedures: violation of the linearity assumption in regression analysis. Biomass and Bioenergy 1: 175-180.
73. Weiner J. 1985. Size hierarchies in experimental populations of annual plants. Ecology 66: 743-752.
74. Weiner J. 1986. How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomoea tricolor populations. Ecology 67: 1425-1427.
75. Weiner J, Thomas CS. 1986. Size variability and competition in plant monocultures. Oikos 47: 211-222.