Three years of free-air CO2 enrichment (POPFACE) only slightly affect profiles of light and leaf characteristics in closed canopies of Populus

Global Change Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1022-1037

  Gielen, Birgit ^a   Liberloo, M ^a   Bogaert, J ^a   Calfapietra, C ^b   de Angelis, P ^b   Miglietta, F ^c   Scarascia Mugnozza, G ^b   Ceulemans, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

FACE; Leaf inclination; Leaf nitrogen; Populus; Red far red ratio; Transmittance of photosynthetic photon flux density

Indexed keywords

CANOPY; CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; LEAF; LIGHT;

POPULUS; POPULUS ALBA; POPULUS NIGRA;

EID: 0042632642     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00644.x     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Anten NPR, Hirose T (1998) Biomass allocation and light partitioning among dominant and subordinate individuals in Xanthium canadense stands. Annals of Botany, 82, 665-673.
2. 4 mono- and dicotyledonous species at low and high nitrogen availability. Physiologia Plantarum, 95, 541-550.
3. 4 mono- and dicotyledonous species. Oecologia, 101, 504-513.
4. 2 on canopy development and red : far-red ratios in two-storied stands of Ricinus communis. Oecologia, 94, 510-515.
5. Baldocchi D, Collineau S (1994) The physical nature of solar radiation in heterogeneous canopies: spatial and temporal attributes. In: Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants. Ecophysiological Processes Above- and Belowground (eds Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW), pp. 21-71. Academic Press, San Diego.
6. Barreiro R, Guiamét JJ, Beltrano J et al. (1992) Regulation of the photosynthetic capacity of primary bean leaves by red : far-red ratio and photosynthetic photon flux density of incident light. Physiologia Plantarum, 85, 97-101.
7. 2, light, and nutrients. Ecology, 74, 104-112.
8. Bernacchi CJ (2002) Improved temperature response functions for modeling photosynthetic carbon assimilation in the context of rising carbon dioxide. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois.
9. Björkman O (1981) Responses to different quantum flux densities. In: Physiological Plant Ecology I. Responses to the Physical Environment, Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. New Series, Vol. 12a (eds Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB et al.), pp. 57-107. Springer, Heidelberg.
10. Boardman NK (1977) Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 28, 355-377.
11. Caldwell MM (1987) Plant architecture and resource competition. In: Ecological Studies, Vol. 61 (eds Schulze E-D, Zwölfer H), pp. 164-179. Springer, Berlin.
12. Calfapietra C, Gielen B, Sabatti M et al. (2001) Growth performance of Populus exposed to 'Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment' during the first growing season in the POPFACE experiment. Annals of Forest Science, 58, 819-828.
13. 2 changes from planting to canopy closure in the POPFACE experiment. New Phytologist, submitted.
14. Campbell GS (1986) Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 36, 317-321.
15. Campbell GS (1990) Derivation of an angle density function for canopies with ellipsoidal leaf angle distributions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 49, 173-176.
16. Campbell GS, Norman JM (1989) The description and measurement of plant canopy structure. In: Plant Canopies: their Growth, Form and Function (eds Russel G, Marshall B, Jarvis PG), pp. 1-19. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
17. Cannell MGR, Milne R, Sheppard LJ et al. (1987) Radiation interception and productivity of willow. Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 261-278.
18. Cannell MGR, Sheppard LJ, Milne R (1988) Light use efficiency and woody biomass production of poplar and willow. Forestry, 61, 125-136.
19. Cutini A, Matteucci G, Scarascia-Mugnozza G (1998) Estimation of leaf area index with the Li-Cor LAI 2000 in deciduous forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 105, 55-65.
20. DeLucia EH, George K, Hamilton JG (2002) Radiation-use efficiency of a forest exposed to elevated concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Tree Physiology, 22, 1003-1010.
21. Ellsworth DS, Reich PB (1993) Canopy structure and vertical patterns of photosynthesis and related leaf traits in a deciduous forest. Oecologia, 96, 169-178.
22. 3 plants. Oecologia, 78, 9-19.
23. Evans JR, Poorter H (2001) Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant, Cell and Environment, 24, 755-767.
24. Farque L, Sinoquet H, Colin F (2001) Canopy structure and light interception in Quercus petraea seedlings in relation to light regime and plant density. Tree Physiology, 21, 1257-1267.
25. Field CB, Mooney HA (1986) The photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship in wild plants. In: On the Economy of Plant Form and Function (ed. Givnish TJ), pp. 25-55. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Frak E, Le Roux X, Millard P et al. (2002) Spatial distribution of leaf nitrogen and photosynthetic capacity within the foliage of individual trees: disentangling the effects of local light quality, leaf irradiance, and transpiration. Journal of Experimental Botany, 53, 2207-2216.
27. Gendron F, Messier C, Comeau PG (1998) Comparison of various methods for estimating the mean growing season percent photosynthetic photon flux density in forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 92, 55-70.
28. 2 enrichment (POPFACE). New Phytologist, 153, 91-100.
29. 2 on growth and branchiness of different poplar (Populus) genotypes in the POPFACE experiment. In: Trends in European Forest Tree Physiology Research (eds Huttunen S, Bucher J, Jarvis P et al.), pp. 183-196. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
30. Gielen B, Calfapietra C, Sabatti M et al. (2001b) Leaf area dynamics in a closed poplar plantation under free-air carbon dioxide enrichment. Tree Physiology, 21, 1245-1255.
31. 2 on natural and managed Populus: a literature review. Environmental Pollution, 115, 335-358.
32. Gratani L (1997) Canopy structure, vertical radiation profile and photosynthetic function in a Quercus ilex evergreen forest. Photosynthetica, 33, 139-149.
33. Hanan NP, Bégué A (1995) A method to estimate instantaneous and daily intercepted photosynthetically active radiation using a hemispherical sensor. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 74, 155-168.
34. 2-enrichment differ among species and depend on understorey light availability. Global Change Biology, 6, 213-226.
35. Heilman PE, Hinckley TM, Roberts DA et al. (1996) Production physiology. In: Biology of Populus and its Implications for Management and Conservation. Part II, Chapter 18 (eds Stettler RF, Bradshaw HD Jr, Heilman PE et al.), pp. 459-489. NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa.
36. Heilman PE, Xie F-G (1994) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on leaf area, light interception, and productivity of short-rotation Populus trichocarpa × Populus deltoides hybrids. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 24, 166-173.
37. 2 enrichment on the photosynthetic light response of sun and shade leaves of canopy sweetgum trees (Liquidambar styraciflua) in a forest ecosystem. Tree Physiology, 19, 779-786.
38. 2 elevation on canopy development in the stands of two cooccurring annuals. Oecologia, 108, 215-223.
39. 2 elevation, canopy photosynthesis, and optimal leaf area index. Ecology, 78, 2339-2350.
40. Hirose T, Werger MJA (1987) Maximizing daily canopy photosynthesis with respect to the leaf nitrogen allocation pattern in the canopy. Oecologia, 72, 520-526.
41. Hutchinson BA, Matt DR, McMillen RT et al. (1986) The architecture of a deciduous forest canopy in eastern Tennessee, USA. Journal of Ecology, 74, 635-646.
42. Kockelbergh F, Assissi B (2000) An inclinometer: a low cost tool for fast and reliable measurements of leaf and branch angles. In: Topics in Ecology: Structure and Function in Plants and Ecosystems (eds Ceulemans R, Bogaert J, Deckmyn G et al.), pp. 40-48. University of Antwerp, UIA, Wilrijk.
43. Koike T, Kitao M, Maruyama Y et al. (2001) Leaf morphology and photosynthetic adjustments among deciduous broad-leaved trees within the vertical canopy profile. Tree Physiology, 21, 951-958.
44. Kull O, Broadmeadow M, Kruijt B et al. (1999) Light distribution and foliage structure in an oak canopy. Trees, 14, 55-64.
45. Li-Cor Inc. (1992) LAI-2000 Plant canopy analyzer operating manual. Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE.
46. Littel RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW et al. (1996) SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, 633p.
47. 2 concentrations: has its importance been underestimated? Plant, Cell and Environment, 14, 729-739.
48. 2 experiment and eddy-flux data. Ecological Applications, 11, 239-252.
49. 2] on photosynthesis in European forest species: a meta-analysis of model parameters. Plant, Cell and Environment, 22, 1475-1495.
50. Meir P, Kruijt B, Broadmeadow M et al. (2002) Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity to irradiance in tree canopies in relation to leaf nitrogen concentration and leaf mass per unit area. Plant, Cell and Environment, 25, 343-357.
51. 2 enrichment (FACE) of a poplar plantation: the POPFACE fumigation system. New Phytologist, 150, 465-476.
52. Mitchell CP, Stevens EA, Watters MP (1999) Short-rotation forestry-operations, productivity and costs based on experience gained in the UK. Forest Ecology and Management, 121, 123-136.
53. Monsi M, Saeki T (1953) Uber den lichtfaktor in den planzengesellschaften und seine bedeutung für die stoffproduktion. Japanese Journal of Botany, 14, 22-52.
54. Monteith JL (1977) Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, B281, 277-294.
55. Niinemets Ü (1998) Adjustment of foliage structure and function to a canopy light gradient in two co-existing deciduous trees. Variability in leaf inclination angles in relation to petiole morphology. Trees, 12, 446-451.
56. Niinemets Ü (1999) Differences in chemical composition relative to functional differentiation between petioles and laminas of Fraxinus excelsior. Tree Physiology, 19, 39-45.
57. Niinemets Ü, Kull O (1999) Biomass investment in leaf lamina versus lamina support in relation to growth irradiance and leaf size in temperate deciduous trees. Tree Physiology, 19, 349-358.
58. Niinemets Ü, Kull O, Tenhunent JD (1999) Variability in leaf morphology and chemical composition as a function of canopy light environment in coexisting deciduous trees. International Journal of Plant Science, 160, 837-848.
59. 2-enriched sweetgum stand. New Phytologist, 150, 477-487.
60. 2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant, Cell and Environment, 22, 683-714.
61. 2-enriched atmosphere. Nature, 411, 469-472.
62. Polhemus Inc. (1993) 3SPACEFASTRAK User's manual, revison F. Colchester, VT, 158p.
63. Pons TL, van Rijnberk H, Scheurwater I et al. (1993) Importance of the gradient in photosynthetically active radiation in a vegetation stand for leaf nitrogen allocation in two monocotyledons. Oecologia, 95, 416-424.
64. Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 975, 384-394.
65. 2. Oecologia, 79, 212-222.
66. Reifsnyder WE, Furnival GM, Horowitz JL (1971/1972) Spatial and temporal distribution of solar radiation beneath forest canopies. Agricultural Meteorology, 9, 21-37.
67. Ross J (1981) The Radiation Regime and Architecture of Plant Stands. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, 391p.
68. Ross J, Sulev M, Saarelaid P (1998) Statistical treatment of the PAR variability and its application to willow coppice. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 91, 1-21.
69. SAS Institute Inc. (1995) SAS System for Regression, 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA, 210p.
70. Scarascia-Mugnozza G, De Angelis P, Sabatti M et al. (2000) A FACE experiment on short rotation, intensive poplar plantation: objective and experimental set up of POPFACE. In: Terrestrial Ecosystem Research in Europe: Successes, Challenges and Policy (eds Sutton MA, Moreno JM, van der Putten WH et al.), pp. 136-140. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
71. Scarascia-Mugnozza GE, Isebrands JG, Hinckley TM et al. (1989) Dynamics of light interception, leaf area and biomass production in Populus clones in the establishment year. Annales Des Sciences Forestières, 46 (Suppl.), 515s-518s.
72. Sinoquet H, Le Roux X, Adam B et al. (2001) RATP: a model for simulating the spatial distribution of radiation absorption, transpiration and photosynthesis within canopies: application to an isolated tree crown. Plant, Cell and Environment, 24, 395-406.
73. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, USA, 859p.
74. Thomas SC, Winner EW (2000) A rotated ellipsoidal angle density function improves estimation of foliage inclination distributions in forest canopies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 100, 19-24.
75. Wang YP, Jarvis PG, Taylor CMA (1991) PAR absorption and its relation to aboveground dry matter production of Sitka spruce. Journal of Applied Ecology, 28, 547-560.
76. de Wit CT (1965) Photosynthesis of Leaf Canopies. Agricultural Research Reports no. 663, Centre for Agricultural Publications and Documentation, Wageningen, 57p.
77. Zavitkovski J (1982) Characterization of light climate under canopies of intensively cultured hybrid poplar plantations. Agricultural Meteorology, 25, 245-255.