Production physiology and growth potential of poplars under short-rotation forestry culture

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 121, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 9-23

  Ceulemans, R ^a   Deraedt, W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Growth; Leaf phenology; Poplar; Productivity; Short rotation intensive culture; Survival

Indexed keywords

CLONAL VARIATION; CLONE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GENETIC DIVERSITY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOTYPE; HYBRID; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GROWTH; SHORT ROTATION FOREST SYSTEM;

GENETIC VARIATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANTATION FORESTRY;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; POPULUS; POPULUS BEROLINENSIS;

EID: 0033180954     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00564-7     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderson, H.W., 1979. Biomass production of hybrid poplar grown in mini-rotation. In: Poplar Research, Management and Utilization in Canada. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Forest Research Information Paper no. 102, pp. 11.1-11.3.
2. Auclair D., Bouvarel L. Intensive or extensive cultivation of short rotation hybrid poplar coppice on forest land. Biores. Technol. 42:1992;53-60.
3. Barigah T.S., Saugier B., Mousseau M., Guittet J., Ceulemans R. Photosynthesis, leaf area and productivity of 5 poplar clones during their establishment year. Ann. Sci. For. 51:1994;613-625.
4. Bergez J.-E., Auclair D., Bouvarel L. First-year growth of hybrid poplar shoots from cutting or coppice origin. For. Sci. 35:1989;1105-1113.
5. Bonduelle, P., 1990. Taillis à courtes rotations de peuplier (T.C.R.): premiers resultats de developpement en France. In: Grassi, G., Gosse, G., dos Santos, G. (Eds.), Biomass for Energy and Industry, vol. 1. Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., London, pp. 1.356-1.360.
6. Bradshaw H.D. Jr., Stettler R.F. Molecular genetics of growth and development in Populus. IV. Mapping QTLs with large effects on growth, form, and phenology traits in a forest tree. Genetics. 139:1995;963-973.
7. Causton, D.R., Venus, J.C., 1981. The Biometry of Plant Growth. Edward Arnold Publish., London, pp. 307.
8. Ceulemans, R., 1990. Genetic Variation in Functional and Structural Productivity Determinants in Poplar. Thesis Publish., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 101.
9. Ceulemans, R., Isebrands, J.G., 1996. Carbon acquisition and allocation. In: Stettler, R.F., Bradshaw, Jr., H.D., Heilman, P.E., Hinckley, T.M. (Eds.), Biology of Populus and its Implications for Management and Conservation. Part II. Chap. 15. NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, pp. 355-399.
10. Ceulemans R., Scarascia-Mugnozza G.E., Wiard B.M., Braatne J.H., Hinckley T.M., Stettler R.F., Isebrands J.G., Heilman P.E. Production physiology and morphology of Populus species and their hybrids grown under short-rotation. I. Clonal comparisons of 4-year growth and phenology. Can. J. For. Res. 22:1992;1937-1948.
11. Ceulemans R., McDonald A.J.S., Pereira J.S. A comparison among eucalypt, poplar and willow characteristics with particular reference to a coppice, growth-modelling approach. Biomass Bioenergy. 11:1996;215-231.
12. Dickmann, D.I., Stuart, K.W., 1983. The Culture of Poplars in Eastern North America. Michigan State University Public., Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 168.
13. Dickmann, D.I., Keathley, D.E., 1996. Linking physiology, molecular genetics and the Populus ideotype. In: Stettler, R.F., Bradshaw, Jr., H.D., Heilman, P.E., Hinckley, T.M. (Eds.), Biology of Populus and its Implications for Management and Conservation. Part II. Chap. 19. NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, pp. 491-514.
14. Dickmann D.I., Gold M.A., Flore J.A. The ideotype concept and the genetic improvement of tree crops. Plant Breed. Rev. 12:1994;163-193.
15. Dickmann D.I., Nguyen P.V., Pregitzer K.S. Effects of irrigation and coppicing on above-ground growth, physiology, and fine-root dynamics of two field-grown hybrid poplar clones. For. Ecol. Manage. 80:1996;163-174.
16. Dunlap J.M., Heilman P.E., Stettler R.F. Genetic variation and productivity of Populus trichocarpa and its hybrids. V. The influence of ramet position on 3-year growth variables. Can. J. For. Res. 22:1992;849-857.
17. F.A.O., 1980. Peupliers et Saules. Collection FAO/Forests, No. 10, Food and Agricultural Organisation, Commission Internationale du Peuplier, Rome, Italy, pp. 343.
18. Galinski W., Goossens R., Ceulemans R., Impens I. The wood productivity of two poplar clones (Populus trichocarpa × Populus deltoides) as affected by stocking and age. Biomass Bioenergy. 1:1991;233-239.
19. Hansen, E.A., Baker, J.B., 1979. Biomass and nutrient removal in short-rotation intensively cultured plantations. Proc. Sympos. on Impact of Intensive Harvesting on Forest Nutrient Cycling, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, pp. 130-151.
20. Heilman P.E., Peabody D.V. Jr. Effect of harvest cycle and spacing on productivity of black cottonwood in intensive culture. Can. J. For. Res. 11:1981;118-123.
21. Heilman, P.E., Hinckley, T.M., Roberts, D.A., Ceulemans, R., 1996. Production physiology. In: Stettler, R.F., Bradshaw, Jr., H.D., Heilman, P.E., Hinckley, T.M. (Eds.), Biology of Populus and its Implications for Management and Conservation. Part II. Chap. 18. NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, pp. 459-489.
22. Heilman P.E., Stettler R.F. Genetic variation and productivity of Populus trichocarpa T. and G. and its hybrids. II. Biomass production in a 4-year plantation. Can. J. For. Res. 15:1985;384-388.
23. Heilman P.E., Xie F.-G. Influence of nitrogen on growth and productivity of short-rotation Populus trichocarpa × Populus deltoides hybrids. Can. J. For. Res. 23:1993;1863-1869.
24. Heilman P.E., Xie F.-G. Effects of nitrogen fertilisation on leaf area, light interception, and productivity of short-rotation Populus trichocarpa × Populus deltoides hybrids. Can. J. For. Res. 24:1994;166-173.
25. Heilman P.E., Ekuan G., Fogle D. Above- and below-ground biomass and fine roots of 4-year-old hybrids of Populus trichocarpa × Populus deltoides and parental species in short-rotation culture. Can. J. For. Res. 24:1994;1186-1192.
26. Hervé C., Ceulemans R. Short-rotation coppiced vs. non-coppiced poplar: a comparative study at two different field sites. Biomass Bioenergy. 11:1996;139-150.
27. Hinckley, T.M., 1996. Physiology of growth, productivity and stress response. An overview. In: Stettler, R.F., Bradshaw, Jr., H.D., Heilman, P.E., Hinckley, T.M. (Eds.), Biology of Populus and its Implications for Management and Conservation. Part II. NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, pp. 277-281.
28. Hinckley, T.M., Ceulemans, R., Dunlap, J.M., Figliola, A., Heilman, P.E., Isebrands, J.G., Scarascia-Mugnozza, G., Schulte, P.J., Smit, B., Stettler, R.F., Van Volkenburgh, E., Wiard, B.M., 1989. Physiological, morphological and anatomical components of hybrid vigor in Populus. In: Kreeb, K.H., Richter, H., Hinckley, T.M. (Eds.), Structural and Functional Responses to Environmental Stresses. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 199-217.
29. Hinckley, T.M., Braatne, J., Ceulemans, R., Clum, P., Dunlap, J., Newman, D., Smit, B., Scarascia-Mugnozza, G., Van Volkenburgh, E., 1993. Growth dynamics and canopy structure. In: Mitchell, C.P., Ford-Robertson, J.B., Hinckley, T.M., Sennerby-Forsse, L. (Eds.), Ecophysiology of Short-rotation Forest Crops. Elsevier Sci. Publish., London and New York, pp. 1-34.
30. Linder, S., 1985. Potential and actual production in Australian forest stands. In: Landsberg, J.J., Parsons, W. (Eds.), Research for Forest Management. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 11-35.
31. Makeschin F., Rehfuess K.E., Rüsch I., Schörry R. Anbau von Pappeln und Weiden im Kurzumtrieb auf ehemaligem Acker: Standörtliche Voraussetzungen, Nährstoffversorgung, Wuchsleistung und bodenökologische Auswirkungen. Forstw. Cbl. 108:1989;125-143.
32. Michael D.A., Isebrands J.G., Dickmann D.I., Nelson N.D. Growth and development during the establishment year of two Populus clones with contrasting morphology and phenology. Tree Physiol. 4:1988;139-152.
33. Pauley S.S., Perry T.O. Ecotypic variation in the photoperiodic response in Populus. J. Arnold Arbor. Harv. Univ. 35:1954;167-188.
34. Pontailler J.Y., Ceulemans R., Guittet J., Mau F. Linear and non-linear functions of volume index to estimate woody biomass in high density young poplar stands. Ann. Sci. For. 54:1997;335-345.
35. Ranger J., Barneoud C., Nys C. Production ligneuse et rétention d'élements nutritifs par des taillis à courte rotation de peuplier 'Rochester': effet de la densité d'ensouchement. Acta Œcol./Œcol. Plant. 9:1988;245-269.
36. Scarascia-Mugnozza G.E., Isebrands J.G., Hinckley T.M., Stettler R.F. Dynamics of light interception, leaf area and biomass production in Populus clones in the establishment year. Ann. Sci. For. 46:1989;515-518.
37. Sennerby-Forsse, L., Berggren, B., Brunkener, L., Fjell, I., 1984. Growth behaviour and anatomy of meristems in Salix. In: Perttu, K. (Ed.), Ecology and Management of Forest Biomass Systems. Swed. Univ. Agric. Sci., Dept. Ecol. and Environ. Res., Report No. 15, pp. 481-501.
38. Spiers A.G. Influence of environmental, host and cultural factors on conidium morphology of Marssonina species pathogenic to poplars. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 20:1990;154-166.
39. Stettler, R.F., Bradshaw, Jr., H.D., Heilman, P.E., Hinckley, T.M. (Eds.), 1996. Biology of Populus and its Implications for Management and Conservation. NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, pp. 539.
40. Stettler, R.F., Bradshaw, Jr., H.D., 1996. Evolution, genetics and genetic manipulation. Overview. In: Stettler, R.F., Bradshaw, Jr., H.D., Heilman, P.E., Hinckley, T.M. (Eds.), Biology of Populus and its Implications for Management and Conservation. Part II. Chap. 15. NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, pp. 1-6.
41. Strong T., Hansen E. Hybrid poplar spacing/productivity relations in short rotation intensive culture plantations. Biomass Bioenergy. 4:1993;255-261.
42. Weber J.C., Stettler R.F., Heilman P.E. Genetic variation and productivity of Populus trichocarpa and its hybrids. Can. J. For. Res. 15:1985;376-383.