Cognitive engagement and attitude development

Cognitive Development

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 1203-1217

  Lao, Joseph ^a   Kuhn, Deanna ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036554337     PISSN: 08852014     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00117-X     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson, K. J. (1994). Impulsivity, caffeine, and task difficulty: A within-subjects test of the Yerkes-Dodson law. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(6), 813-829.
2. Azmitia, M. (1996). Peer interactive minds: Developmental, theoretical, and methodological issues. In Paul B. Baltes & Ursula M. Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundations of cognition (pp. 133-162). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Capon, N., & Hulbert, J. (1973). The sleeper effect: An awakening. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 333-358.
4. Chaiken, S., Pomerantz, E., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (1995). Structural consistency and attitude strength. In Richard E. Petty & Jon A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (chap. 15, pp. 387-412). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge-building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 1-40.
6. Cheney, R. (1999). Vividness and narrative as factors in cognitive change. Unpublished manuscript, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, USA.
7. Chinn, C., & Brewer, W. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1-49.
8. Dimant, R. J., & Bearison, D. J. (1991). Development of formal reasoning during successive peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 27(2), 277-284.
9. Gilbert, M. (1997). Coalescent argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Kruger, A. C. (1993). Peer collaboration: Conflict, cooperation, or both? Social Development, 2(3), 165-182.
11. Kuhn, D. (2001). Why development does (and doesn't) occur: Evidence from the domain of inductive reasoning. In R. Siegler & J. McClelland (Eds.), Mechanisms of cognitive development: Behavioral and neural perspectives. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
12. Kuhn, D., & Lao, J. (1996). Effects of evidence on attitudes: Is polarization the norm? Psychological Science, 7(2), 115-120.
13. Kuhn, D., & Lao, J. (1998). Contemplation and conceptual change: Integrating perspectives from social and cognitive psychology. Developmental Review, 18, 125-154.
14. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287-315.
15. Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (submitted). The development of argument skills.
16. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098-2109.
17. Miller, A. G., McHoskey, J.W., Bane, C. M., & Dowd, T. (1993). The attitude polarization phenomenon: Role of response measure, attitude extremity, and behavioral consequences of reported attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 561-574.
18. Staudinger, U. M., & Baltes, P. B. (1996). Interactive minds: A facilitative setting for wisdom-related performance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 746-762.
19. Tesser, A. (1976). Attitude polarization as a function of thought and reality constraints. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 183-194.
20. Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, II, 289-338.
21. Tesser, A., Martin, L., & Mendolia, M. (1995). The impact of thought on attitude extremity and attitude-behavior consistency. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 73-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Wilson, T., & Schooler, J. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.
23. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimuli to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459-482.