Circular reasoning

Cognitive Science

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 767-795

  Rips, Lance J ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036837911     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00085-X     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baron, J. (1991). Beliefs about thinking. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 169-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Bonjour, L. (1989). The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Brem, S. K., & Rips, L. J. (2000). Evidence and explanation in informal argument. Cognitive Science, 24, 573-604.
4. Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259-294.
5. Coleman, L., & Kay, P. (1981). Prototype semantics: The English word lie. Language, 57, 26-44.
6. de Swart, H. (1998). Introduction to natural language semantics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
7. Garnham, A. (1983). What's wrong with story grammars? Cognition, 15, 145-154.
8. Goldfarb, W. (1988). Poincaré against the logicists. In W. Aspray & P. Kitcher (Eds.), History and philosophy of modern mathematics (pp. 61-81). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Grosz, B. J., Pollack, M. E., & Sidner, C. L. (1989). Discourse. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 437-468). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen.
11. Jackson, F. (1984). Petitio and the purpose of arguing. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 65, 26-36.
12. Keysar,B. (1994). The illusory transparency of intention: Linguistic perspective taking in text. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 165-208.
13. Krosnick, J. A., & Alwin, D. F. (1988). A test of the form-resistant correlation hypothesis: Ratings, rankings, and the measurement of values. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 526-538.
14. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Martin, E. (2001). Remarks on "Seam effects for quantitative and qualitative facts." In Seminar on the funding opportunity in survey research (Statistical Policy Working Paper 33, pp. 30-33). Washington, DC: Statistical Policy Office, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget.
16. Mathiesen, J. (2000). Cioppino. In J. Thorne (Ed.), Pot on the fire. New York: North Point Press.
17. Mosteller, F. & Tukey, J. W. (1977). Data analysis and regression. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18. Perkins, D. N., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 83-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Ranney, M., Schank, P., Hoadley, C., & Neff, J. (1994). "I know one when I see one": How (much) do hypotheses differ from evidence? Proceedings of the 5th ASIA SAG/C Classification Research Workshop, 139-155.
20. Reichman-Adar, R. (1984). Extended person-machine interface. Artificial Intelligence, 22, 157-218.
21. Rips, L. J. (1998). Reasoning and conversation. Psychological Review, 105, 411-441.
22. Rips, L. J. (2001). Circularities. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
23. Rips, L. J., Brem, S. K., & Bailenson, J. (1999). Reasoning dialogues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 172-177.
24. Rips, L. J., Conrad, F. G., Fricker, S. S., & Behr, J. (2001). Seam effects for quantitative and qualitative facts. In Seminar on the funding opportunity in survey research (Statistical Policy Working Paper 33, pp. 7-25). Washington, DC: Statistical Policy Office, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget.
25. Schechtman, M. (1999). Personhood and personal identity. Journal of Philosophy, 87, 71-92.
26. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (1999). Begging the question. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77, 174-191.
27. Sorensen, R. A. (1991). 'P, therefore, P' without circularity. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 245-266.
28. Sorensen, R. (1999). An empathic theory of circularity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77, 498-509.
29. Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Henkemans, F. S. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Voss, J. F., & Means, M. L. (1991). Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation. Learning and Instruction, 1, 337-350.
32. Walton, D. N. (1991). Begging the question. New York: Greenwood Press.