Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: Mammotome®;Biopsies stéréotaxiques du sein par aspiration: Le Mammotome®

Feuillets de Radiologie

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 418-426+452

  Plantade, R ^a   Hammou, J C ^b   Fighiera, M ^a   Aubanel, D ^b  

^a Ctr d'Imagerie Med Nice Europe   (France)

^b Cabinet d'Anatomopathologie   (France)

Author keywords

Breast; Clusters of microcalcifications; Mammotome ; Minimal cancer; Percutaneous biopsy; Stereotaxy; Vacuum assisted biopsy

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICE; HUMAN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; REVIEW; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY; VACUUM ASSISTED BIOPSY;

EID: 0142026871     PISSN: 01819801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé (ANAES). Recommandation pour la pratique clinique. Conduite à tenir devant une image mammographique infra-clinique anormale. Paris 1999.
2. Liberman L, LaTrenta LR, Van Zee KJ, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD. Stereotactic core biopsy of calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy. Radiology 1997; 203: 673-7.
3. Elvecrog E, Lechner M, Nelson M. Non palpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy and surgical results. Radiology 1993; 188: 453-5.
4. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Luethke JM, Hopper KD, Yakes WF, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990; 176: 741-7.
5. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991; 180: 403-7.
6. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of 14 and 11 Gauge Mammotome probe performance and complication rates. Am J Surg 1997; 63: 988-95.
7. Hagay C, Cherel P, Becette V. Les micro-biopsies guidées par la mammographie numérisée. J Le Sein 1998; 8: 38-45.
8. Nath ME, Robinson TM, Tobon H, Chough DM, Sumkin JH. Automated large-core needle biopsy of surgically removed breast lesions: comparison of samples obtained with 14 -, 16 -, and 18 - gauge needles. Radiology 1995; 197: 739-42.
9. Hall FM, Storella JM, Silverstone DZ, Wyshak G. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommandations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology 1988; 167: 353-8.
10. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, Evans WP 3rd, Lechner MC, Richardson TR, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14 gauge directional vacuum assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997; 204: 485-8.
11. Burbank F, Parker Sh, Forgaty TJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the mammotome. Am J Surg 1996; 62: 343-7.
12. Carter D, Smith RR. Carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 1977; 40: 1189-93.
13. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy: its history, its present, and its future. Am J Surg 1996; 62: 128-50.
14. Burbank F, Parker SH. Stereotaxic core breast biopsy. A replacement for surgical breast biopsy. Surg Tech International 11: 179-86.
15. Parker SH, Stavros AT, Dennis MA. Needle biopsy techniques. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33: 1171-86.
16. Parker SH, Dennis MA, Stavros AT. Critical pathways in percutaneous breast intervention. Radiographics 1995; 15: 946-50.
17. Parker SH, Burbank F. A pratical approach to minimally invasive breast biopsy. Radiology 1996; 200: 11-20.
18. Parker SH, Israel PZ. The evolution of minimally invasive breast biopsy: from FNA to percutaneous incisional and excisional biopsy. Surg Techn international V 1996: 251-6.
19. Plantade R, Hammou JC, Aubanel D, et al. Biopsies mammaires assistées par le vide: le mammotome. Rev Prat Gynecol Obst 2003; 71: 34-8.
20. American College of Radiology (ACR). Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS). Third edition. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology, 1998.
21. Inserm et Fédération nationale des centres de lutte contre le cancer. Risques héréditaires du cancer du sein et de l'ovaire. Quelle prise en charge? Inserm ed Paris 1998, vol 1.
22. Lindfors KK, O'Connor J, Acredolo CR, Liston SE. Short-interval follow-up mammography versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions: assessment of patient stress. AJR 1998; 171: 55-8.
23. Plantade R, Fighiera M, Hammou JC. What management for high-risk mastopathies after percutaneous diagnosis? Eur Radiol 2003: à paraître.
24. Hagay C, Cherel P, Belette V. Les biopsies stéréotaxiques sur table dédiée avec dispositif de biopsie assistée par aspiration (DBAA): à propos de 300 foyers de micro-calcifications XXIIes journées nationales de la Société Française de Sénologie et de Pathologie Mammaire. Toulouse, 2000 oct.
25. Morrow M, Schmidt R, Cregger B, Hassett C, Cox S. Preoperative evaluation of abnormal mammographic findings to avoid unnecessary breast biopsy. Arch Surg 1994; 129: 1091-6.
26. Dilhuidy MH, Barreau B, Henriques C. Cancers infracliniques du sein: diagnostic et déductions stratégiques. Reprod Hum Horm 1997; 5: 267-78.
27. Cherel P, Hagay C, De Maulmont C. Macrobiopsies mammaires par aspiration: Problèmes posés au radiologue. J Le Sein 2002; 12: 130-41.
28. Lev-Toaff AS, Feig SA, Saitas VL, Finkel GC, Schwartz GF. Stability of malignant breast microcalcifications. Radiology 1994; 192: 153-6.
29. Holland R, Hendriks JH, Vebeek AL, Mravunac M, Schuurmans Stekhoven JH. Extent, distribution, and mammographic histological correlation of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet 1990; 335: 519-22.
30. Fondrinier E, Lorimier G. Exérèse chirurgicale diagnostique. In Masson Ed. Les micro-calcifications isolées du sein. Paris 1999, p 107-120.
31. Holland R, Hendriks JH. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic pathologic correlation. Semin Diag Pathol 1994; 11: 182-92.
32. Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP. Calcification retrievial at stereotactic, 11-G directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 1998; 208: 251-60.
33. Besson P, Ceugnart L, Chaveron C. Corrélations radio-histologiques. A propos de 300 foyers de micro-calcifications. JFR Paris 2001 Oct, Poster S6.
34. Travade A, Isnard A, Bagard C, Bouchet F, Chouzet S, Gaillot A, et al. Macrobiopsies stéréotaxiques par système à aspiration 11-G. A propos de 249 patientes. J Radiol 2002; 83: 1063-71.
35. Philpotts LE, Lee CH, Horvath LJ, Lange RC, Carter D, Tocino I. Underestimation of breast cancer with 11-G vacuum suction biopsy. AJR 2000; 175: 1047-50.
36. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Schaumloffel U, Viehweg P, Hofer H, Buchmann J, Lampe D. Minimally invasive stereotaxic vacuum core breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 377-85.
37. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Borgen PI. Percutaneous removal of benign mammographic lesions at stereotactic vacuum assisted biopsy. Radiology 1998; 206: 711-5.
38. Seror JY, Antoine M, Scetbon F, Chopier J, Sananes S, Ghenassia C, et al. Apport des macrobiopsies stéréotaxiques par aspiration dans la stratégie de prise en charge des micro-calcifications mammaires: Première série prospective de 115 cas. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2000; 28: 806-19.
39. Plantade R, Hammou JC, Aubanel D. Biopsies stéréotaxiques assistées par le vide: prise en charge précoce des lésions mammaires. J Le Sein 2002; 12: 284-90.
40. Feillel V, Lemery S, Troneke S. Macrobiopsies par aspiration: système MIBB. XVIIe journées annuelles du collège de gynécologie médicale du Sud Est, 2001 février.
41. Mayras C, Doutriaux-Dumoulin I. Biopsie mammaire assistée par aspiration. J Le Sein 2001; 11: 133-43.
42. Burbank F, Forcier N. Tissue marking clip for stereotactic breast biopsy: initial place accuracy, long term stability, and usefulness as guide for wire localization. Radiology 1997; 205: 407-15.
43. Ancona A. Digital stereotactic breast microbiopsy with the mammotome: study of 122 cases. Radiol Med 2001; 101: 341-7.
44. Meunier M, Buron C, El Khoury C. Evaluation comparative de la prise en charge et des coûts des lésions infra-cliniques par macrobiopsie et par biopsie chirurgicale. J Le Sein 2002; 12: 149-56.
45. Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ. Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR 2000; 174: 1769-77.
46. Adrales G, Turk P, Wallace T, Bird R, Norton HJ, Greene F. Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by mammotome? Am J Surg 2000; 180: 313-5.
47. Brem RF, Behrndt VS, Sanow L, Gatewood OM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11 Gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. AJR 1999; 172: 1405-7.
48. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997; 202: 843-7.
49. Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC, Kaelin C, Selland DL, Denison CM, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: result of surgical excision. AJR 2000; 175: 1341-6.
50. Reynolds HE. Core needle biopsy of challenging benign breast conditions: a comprehensive literature review. AJR 2000; 174: 1245-50.
51. Liberman L, Kaplan JB, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Menell JH, Dershaw DD. To excise or to sample the mammographic target: what is the goal of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy? AJR 2002; 179: 679-83.
52. Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ. Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies: to excise or not to excise? Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26: 1095-110.
53. Burbank F. Mammotomy: post-biopsy, mammogram, findings and CPTcoding. Admin Radiol J 1997; 16: 14-19.
54. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, Kaelin C, DiPiro PJ, Denison CM, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 1999; 181: 1638-41.
55. Liberman L, Vuolo M, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, LaTrenta LR, et al. Epithelial displacement after stereotactic 11-G directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR 1999; 172: 677-81.
56. Won B, Reynolds HE, Lazaridis CL, Jackson VP. Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using 11-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Device: persistent underestimation of disease. AJR 1999; 173: 227-9.
57. MacGrogan G, Henriques C, De Mascarel I, Soubeyran I, Molimard J, Barreau B, et al. Large core of nonpalpable breast lesions. Arch Anat Cytol Pathol 1998; 46: 241-6.
58. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PP. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions and indication for surgical biopsy. AJR 1995; 164: 1111-3.
59. Lee CH, Carter D, Philpotts LE, Couce ME, Horvath LJ, Lange RC. Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: can invasion be predicted? Radiology 2000; 217: 466-70.
60. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SM. Accuracy of sampling ductal carcinoma in situ by three stereotactic breast biopsy methods. Radiology 1998; 209: 197-8.
61. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: Determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001; 218: 497-502.
62. Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-Gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 2002; 224: 548-54.
63. Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA, et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. An indicator of missed cancer. Cancer 2000; 12: 2538-46.
64. Gallagher WJ, Cardenosa G, Rubens JR, et al. Minimal-volume excision of nonpalpable breats lesions. AJR 1989; 153: 957-61.
65. Weyant M, Carrocio A, Tartter PI, et al. Determinants of success spot localization biopsy of the breast. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 181: 521-4.
66. Stein MA, Karlan M. Immediate postoperative mammogram for failed surgical excision of breast lesions. Radiology 1991; 178: 159-62.
67. Hasselgren PO, Hummel RP, Georgian-Smith D, et al. Breast biopsy with needle localization accuracy of specimen x-ray and management of missed lesions. Surgery 1993; 114: 836-40.
68. Rissanen TJ, Makarainen HP, Mattila SI, et al. Wire localized biopsy of breast lesions: a review of 425 cases found in screening or clinical mammography. Clin Radiol 1993; 47: 14-22.
69. Homer MJ. Nonpalpable breast microcalcifications: frequency, management, and results of incisional biopsy. Radiology 1992; 185: 411-3.
70. Lamarque JL, Laurent JC, Pujol J, et al. Du bon usage de la cytologie et de la macrobiopsie à l'aiguille fine en pratique médicale courante. J Le Sein 1995; 2: 143-54.
71. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, et al. Stereotactic automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative ands histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999; 210: 799-805.
72. Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath L, et al. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology 1999; 212: 189-94.
73. Liberman L. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. AJR 2000; 174: 1191-9.
74. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Dipiro PJ, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of clustered microcalcifications with a directional, vacuum-assisted device. Radiology 1997; 204: 575-6.
75. Reynolds HE, Poon CM, Goulet RJ, et al. Biopsy of breast microcalcifications using an 11-Gauge directional vacuum-assisted device. AJR 1998; 171: 611-3.
76. Lennington WJ, Jensen RA, Dalton LW, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: heterogeneity of individual lesions. Cancer 1994; 73: 118-24.
77. Tardivon A, Guinebretiere JM, Corvellec-Rudelli A, et al. Les prélèvements percutanés: tout prélever, trop prélever? Techniques, qualité et conséquences des prélèvements. J Le Sein 2000; 10: 119-23.
78. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13: 896-902.
79. Liberman L, La Trenta L, Van Zee K, et al. Stereotactic core biopsy of calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy. Radiology 1997; 203: 673-7.
80. Obenauer S, Fischer U, Baum F, et al. Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as BI-RADS 3. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2001; 173: 696-701.
81. Apesteguia L, Mellado M, Saenz J, et al. Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy on digital stereotaxic table of nonpalpable lesions nonrecognisable by ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 638-45.
82. Berg WA, Arnoldus CL, Teferra E, et al. Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology 2001; 221: 495-503.
83. Baker JA, Kornguyh PJ, Floyd CE. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. AJR 1996; 166: 773-8.
84. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 1801-9.
85. Klem D. Stereotactic breast biopsy in a community hospital setting. Am J Surg 1999; 65: 737-41.
86. Poplack Sp, Tosteson An, Grove MR, et al. Mammography in 53803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network. Radiology 2000; 217: 832-40.
87. Mc Kay C, Hart CL, Erbacher G. Objectivity and accuracy of mammogram interpretation using the BIRADS final assessment categories in 40- to 49 year old women. JAOA 2000; 100: 615-9.
88. Taplin SH, Ichikawa LE, Kerlikowske K, et al. Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology 2002; 222: 529-35.
89. Lamm RL, Jackman RJ. Mammographic abnormalities caused by percutaneous stereotactic biopsy of histologically benign lesions evident on follow-up mammograms. AJR 2000; 174: 753-6.
90. Doutriaux-Dumoulin I, Meingan P, Ricaud-Couprie M, et al. Aspects mammographiques après biopsie mammaire 8G assistée par aspiration sur table dédiée. JFR Paris, 2001 Oct. Poster S5.
91. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA, Nowels KW. Percutaneous removal of benign mammographic lesions: comparison of automated large-core and directional vacuum-assisted biopsy techniques. AJR 1998; 171: 1325-30.
92. Beck RM, Gotz L, Heywang-Kobrunner SH. Stereotaxic vacuum core breast biopsy. Experience of 560 patients. Swiss Surg 2000; 6: 108-10.
93. Rotter K, Haentschel G, Koethe D, et al. Follow-up after 1200 stereotactic vacuum biopsies. RSNA 2001; 632.
94. Plantade R, Aubanel D, Fighiera M. Remaniements mammaires post-mammotome®. Communication orale 590 et poster 591, Journées Françaises de Radiologie, Paris 19-23 Oct 2002.
95. Cangiarella J. The incidence of positive margins with breast conserving therapy following mammotome biopsy for microcalcification. J Surg Oncol 2000; 74: 263-6.