Vaccum-assisted stereotactic: Early care for breast tumors;Biopsies stéréotaxiques assistées par le vide: Prise en charge précoce des lésions mammaires

Sein

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 284-290

  Plantade, R ^a   Hammou, J C ^b   Aubanel, D ^a   Fighiera, M ^a   Scotto, A ^a  

^a Ctr d'Imagerie Med Nice Europe   (France)

^b Cabinet d'Anatomopathologie   (France)

Author keywords

Breast; Stereotactic; Vacuum assisted biopsy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; EXPERIENCE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; PATIENT CARE; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY; VACUUM ASPIRATION;

EID: 0036986913     PISSN: 11631961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. RÉSEAU FRANÇAIS DES REGISTRES DES CANCERS (FRAN-CIM). Incidence du cancer en France. Estimations régionales 1985-1995. Francim 1999.
2. PARKIN DM, LAARA E, MUIR CS. Estimates of the worldwide frequency of sixteen major cancers in 1980. Int J Cancer 1988; 41: 184-197.
3. FEIG SA, SHABER GS, PATCHEFSKY A et al. Analysis of clinical occult and mammographically occult breast tumor. AJR 1977; 128: 403-408.
4. MOSKOWITZ M. The predictive value of certain mammographic signs in screening for breast cancer. Cancer 1983; 51:1007-1011.
5. AMERICAN COLLEGE of RADIOLOGY. ACR Standard for performance of stereotacilly guided breast interventional procedures. 1996.
6. AGENCE NATIONALE D'ACCRÉDITATION ET D'ÉVALUATION EN SANTÉ (ANAES). Recommandation pour la pratique clinique. Conduite à tenir devant une image mammographique infra-clinique anormale. Paris 1999.
7. INSERM et FÉDÉRATION NATIONALE DES CENTRES DE LUTTE CONTRE LE CANCER. Risques héréditaires du cancer du sein et de l'ovaire. Quelle prise en charge ? Inserm ed Paris 1998, vol. 1.
8. LINDFORS KK, O'CONNOR J, ACREDOLO CR et al. Short-interval follow-up mammography versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions: assessment of patient stress. AJR. 1998; 171: 55-58.
9. PLANTADE R, HAMMOU JC, AUBANEL D et al. Sous-estimation diagnostique des biopsies 11G assistées par le vide. A paraître.
10. es journées nationales de la Société Française de Sénologie et de Pathologie Mammaire. Toulouse, 2000 oct.
11. MORROW M, SCHMIDT R, CREGGER B et al. Preoperative evaluation of abnormal mammographic findings to avoid unnecessary breast biopsy. Arch Surg 1994; 129: 1091-1096.
12. DILHUIDY MH, BARREAU B, HENRIQUES C et al. Cancers infracliniques du sein: diagnostic et déductions stratégiques. Reprod Hum et Horm 1997; X, 5: 267-278.
13. LEV-TOAFFS SA, FRIEG A, SAITAS SL et al. Stability of malignant breast microcalcifications. Radiology 1994; 192: 153-156.
14. HOLLAND R, HENDRIKS JH, VEBEEK AL et al. Extent, distribution, and mammographic histological correlation of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet 1990; 335: 519-522.
15. FONDRINIER E, LORIMIER G. Exérèse chirurgicale diagnostique. In: Masson Ed. Les microcalcifications isolées du sein. Paris 1999: 107-120.
16. HOLLAND R, HENDRIKS JH. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic pathologic correlation. Semin Diag Pathol 1994; 11: 182-192.
17. LIBERMAN L, SMOLKIN JH, DERSHAW DD et al. Calcification retrievial at stereotactic, 11-G directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 1998; 208: 251-260.
18. SEROR JY. Symposium Breast Care. Les Saintes Maries de la Mer, Juin 2001. Communication Orale.
19. BESSON P, CEUGNART L, CHAVERON C et al. Corrélations radio-histologiques. À propos de 300 foyers de microcalcifications. JFR Paris 2001 Oct, Poster S6.
20. es journées nationales de la Société Française de Sénologie et de Pathologie Mammaire. Strasbourg, 2001 Oct. Communication orale 5: 84-88.
21. HEYWANG-KOBRUNNER SH, SCHAUMLOFFEL U, VIEHWEG P et al. Minimally invasive stereotaxic vacuum core breast biopsy. Eur. Radiol 1998; 8: 377-385.
22. PHILPOTTs LE, LEE CH, HORWARTH L et al. Underestimation of breast cancer with 11-G vacuum suction biopsy. AJR 2000; 175: 1047-1050.
23. BURBANK F: Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of 14 and 11 Gauge Mammotome probe perfomance and complication rates. Am Surg 1997; 63: 988-995.
24. LAMM RL, JACKMAN RJ. Mammographic abnormalities caused by percutaneous stereotactic biopsy of histologically benign lesions evident on follow-up mammograms. AJR 2000; 174: 753-756.
25. DOUTRIAUX-DUMOULIN I, MEINGAN P, RICAUD-COUPRIE M et al. Aspects mammographiques après biopsie mammaire 8G assistée par aspiration sur table dédiée. JFR Paris, 2001 Oct. Poster S5.
26. JACKMAN RJ, MARZONi FA, NOWELS KW. Percutaneous removal of benign mammographic lesions: Comparison of automated large-core and directional vacuum-assisted biopsy techniques. AJR 1998; 171: 1325-1330.
27. BECK RM, GOTZ L, HEYWANG-KOBRUNNER SH. Stereotaxic vacuum core breast biopsy. Experience of 560 patients. Swiss Surgery 2000; 6: 108-110.
28. e journées annuelles du collège de gynécologie médicale du Sud Est, 2001 fév.
29. SEROR JY, ANTOINE M, SCETBON F et al. Apport des macrobiopsies par aspiration dans la stratégie de prise en charge des lésions infra-cliniques du sein. Cours supérieur francophone sur le cancer du sein. Saint Paul de Vence, 2001 Janv.
30. MAYRAS C, DOUTRIAUX-DUMOULIN I. Biopsie mammaire assistée par aspiration. Le sein 2001; 11: 133-143.
31. CHEREL P, HAGAY C, DE MAULMONT C et al. Macrobiopsies mammaires par aspiration: Problèmes posés au radiologue. Le Sein 2002; 12: 130-141.
32. MEUNIER M, BURON C, EL KHOURY C et al. Evaluation comparative de la prise en charge et des coûts des lésions infra-cliniques par macrobiopsie et par biopsie chirurgicale. Le Sein 2002; 12: 149-156.
33. LIBERMAN L, LA TRENTA L, VAN ZEE K et al. Stereotactic core biopsy of calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy. Radiology 1997; 203: 673-677.
34. BERG W, CAMPASSI C, LANGENBERG P et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR 2000; 174: 1769-1777.
35. BAKER JA, KORNGUYH PJ, FLOYD CE. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. AJR 1996; 166: 773-778.
36. KERLIKOWSKE K, GRADY D, BARCLAY J et al. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 1801-1809.
37. BURBANK F. Mammotomy: Post-biopsy, Mammogram, Findings and CPTcoding. Administrative Radiology Journal. Vol. XVI no 8. 1997 Aug: 14-19.
38. KLEM D. Stereotactic breast biopsy in a community hospital setting. Am Surg 1999; 65: 737-741.
39. ANCONA A. Digital stereotactic breast microbiopsy with the mammotome: study of 122 cases. Radiol Med 2001; 101: 341-347.
40. BURBANK F, FORCIER N. Tissue marking clip for stereotactic breast biopsy: initial place accuracy, long term stability, and usefulness as guide for wire localization. Radiology 1997; 205: 407-415.
41. BURBANK F, PARKER SH, FORGATY TJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with mammotome. Am Surg 1996; 62: 343-347.
42. LIBERMAN L, DERSHAW D, ROSEN P et al. Percutaneous removal of benign mammographic lesions at stereotactic vacuum assisted biopsy. Radiology 1998; 206: 711-715.
43. ADRALES G, TURK P, WALLACE T et al. Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by mammotome ? Am Surg 2000; 180: 313-315.
44. BREM R, BEHRNDT U, SANOW L et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11 Gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. AJR 1999; 172: 1405-1407.
45. BURBANK F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997; 202: 843-847.
46. DARLING C, SMITH DN, LESTER SC et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: result of surgical excision. AJR 2000; 175: 1341-1346.
47. JACKMAN R, BURBANK F, PARKER S et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14 gauge directional vacuum assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997; 204: 485-488.
48. HAGAY C, CHEREL P, BECETTE V et al. Les microbiopsies guidées par la mammographie numérisée. Le Sein 1998; 8: 38-45.
49. MEYER JE, SMITH DN, LESTER SC et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 1999; 181: 1638-1641.
50. LIBERMAN L, VUOLO M, DERSHAW DD et al. Epithelial displacement after stereotactic 11-G directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR 1999; 172: 677-681.
51. WON B, REYNOLDS HE, LAZARIDIS CL et al. Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using 11 - Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Device: persistent underestimation of disease. AJR 1999; 173: 227-229.
52. Mc GROGAN G, HENRIQUES C, DE M, SOUBEYRAN I et al. Large core of nonpalpable breast lesions. Arch Anat Cytol Pathol 1998; 46: 241-246.
53. LIBERMAN L, COHEN MA, DERSHAW DD et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions and indication for surgical biopsy. AJR 1995; 164: 1111-1113.
54. ELVECROG E, LECHNER M, NELSON M. Non palpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy and surgical results. Radiology 1993; 188: 453-455.
55. LEE CH, CARTER D, PHILPOTTS LE et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: can invasion be predicted ? Radiology 2000; 217: 466-470.
56. LIBERMAN L, DROTMAN M, MORRIS EA et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. An indicator of missed cancer. Cancer 2000; 12: 2538-2546.
57. GALLAGHER WJ, CARDENOSA G, RUBENS JR et al. Minimal-volume excision of nonpalpable breats lesions. AJR 1989; 153: 957-961.
58. WEYANT M, CARROCIO A, TARTTER PI et al. Determinants of success spot localization biopsy of the breast. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 181: 521-524.
59. STEIN MA, KARLAN M. Immediate postoperative mammogram for failed surgical excision of breast lesions. Radiology 1991; 178: 159-162.
60. HASSELGREN PO, HUMMEL RP, GEORGIAN-SMITH D et al. Breast biopsy with needle localization accuracy of specimen x-ray and management of missed lesions. Surgery 1993; 114: 836-840.
61. RISSANEN TJ, MAKARAINEN HP, MATTILA SI et al. Wire localized biopsy of breast lesions: a review of 425 cases found in screening or clinical mammography. Clin radiol 1993; 47: 14-22.
62. HOMER MJ. Nonpalpable breast microcalcifications: frequency, management, and results of incisional biopsy. Radiology 1992; 185: 411-413.
63. LAMARQUE JL, LAURENT JC, PUJOL J et al. Du bon usage de la cytologie et de la macrobiopsie à l'aiguille fine en pratique médicale courante. Le Sein 1995; 2: 143-154.
64. JACKMAN RJ, NOWELS KW, RODRIGUEZ-SOTO J et al. Stereotactic automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative ands histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999; 210: 799-805.
65. LEE CH, PHILPOTTS LE, HORVATH L et al. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology 1999; 212: 189-194.
66. LIBERMAN L. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. AJR 2000; 174: 1191-1199.
67. MEYER JE, SMITH DN, DIPIRO PJ et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of clustered microcalcifications with a directional, vacuum-assisted device. Radiology 1997; 204: 575-576.
68. REYNOLDS HE, POON CM, GOULET RJ et al. Biopsy of breast microcalcifications using an 11-Gauge directional vacuum-assisted device. AJR 1998; 171: 611-613.
69. LENNINGTON WJ, JENSEN RA, DALTON LW et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: heterogeneity of individual lesions. Cancer 1994; 73: 118-124.
70. PARKER S, LOVIN J, JOBE W et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990; 176: 741-747.
71. PARKER S, LOVIN J, JOBE W et al. Non palpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991; 180: 403-407.
72. NATH ME, ROBINSON TM, TOBON H et al. Automated large-core needle biopsy of surgically removed breast lesions: comparison of samples obtained with 14 -, 16 -, and 18 -gauge needles. Radiology 1995; 197: 739-742.
73. HALL FM, STORELLA JM, SILVERSTONE DZ et al. Non palpable breast lesions: recommandations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology 1998; 167: 353-358.
74. LOMOSCHITZ FM. RSNA Chicago 2000 Nov. 1511.
75. PARKER S, KLAUS A. Performing a breast biopsy with a directional vacuum-assisted biopsy instrument. Radiographics 1997; 17: 1233-1252.
76. JACKMAN RJ, BURBANK F, PARKER SH et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: Determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001; 218: 497-502.
77. TARDIVON A, GUINEBRETIERE JM, CORVELLEC-RUDELLI A et al. Les prélèvements percutanés: tout prélever, trop prélever ? Techniques, qualité et conséquences des prélèvements. Le Sein 2000; 10: 119-123.
78. CANGIARELLA J. The incidence of positive margins with breast conserving therapy following mammotome biopsy for microcalcification. J Surg Oncol 2000; 74: 263-266.