Short-interval follow-up mammography versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions: Assessment of patient stress

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 171, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 55-58

  Lindfors, Karen K ^a   O'Connor, Jacqueline ^b   Acredolo, Curt R ^b   Liston, Steven E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Woodland   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SELF REPORT; STRESS;

EID: 0031832006     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.171.1.9648763     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991;179:463-468
2. Varas X, Leborgne F, Leborgne JH. Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 1992;184:409-414
3. Mikhail RA, Nathan RC, Weiss M, et al. Stereotactic core needle biopsy of mammographic breast lesions as a viable alternative to surgical biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 1994;1:363-367
4. Janes RH, Bouton MS. Initial 300 consecutive stereotactic core-needle breast biopsies by a surgical group. Am J Surg 1994;168:533-537
5. Kurtzman SH, MacGillivray DC, Deckers PJ. Evolving strategies for the management of breast abnormalities. Surg Oncol 1995;4:1-14
6. Franquet T, Cozcolleula R, De Miquel C. Stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration of low-suspicion, nonpalpable breast nodules: valid alternative to follow-up mammography. Radiology 1992;183: 635-637
7. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 2nd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1995:17
8. Scheier MF, Carver CS. Optimism, coping and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectations. Health Psychol 1985; 4:219-247
9. Handy RB, Fajardo LL, Innis CA, Witzke DB, Hunter TB. Patient perceptions of stereotaxic large-core breast biopsy. Acad Radiol 1996;3: 1007-1011
10. Lindfors KK, Rosenquist CJ. Needle core biopsy guided with mammography: a study of cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1994;190:217-222
11. Brenner RJ, Sickles EA. Surveillance mammography and stereotactic core breast biopsy for probably benign lesions: a cost comparison analysis. Acad Radiol 1997;4:419-425
12. Sickles EA, Parker SH. Appropriate role of core breast biopsy in the management of probably benign lesions (editorial). Radiology 1993;188:315
13. Sickles EA, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA, Galvin HB, Monticciolo DL. Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinations. Radiology 1990;175:323-327
14. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Eaton A, Ernster V. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA 1993;270:2444-2450
15. Stanton AL, Snider PR. Coping with a breast cancer diagnosis: a prospective study. Health Psychol 1992;12:16-23
16. Scheier MF, Carver CS. Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognit Ther Res 1992;16:201-228
17. Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Jepson C, Brody D, Boyce A. Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol 1991;10:259-267
18. Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Boyce A, Jepson C, Engstrom PF. Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:657-661