Orthography Influences the Perception of Speech in Alexic Patients

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 981-990

  Miller, Kimberly M ^a,b,d   Swick, Diane ^b,c,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^e VA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; AGRAPHIA; ALEXIA; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN REGION; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; DECISION MAKING; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LATENT PERIOD; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; ORTHOGRAPHY; PATIENT; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DYSLEXIA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT;

EID: 0142024999     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892903770007371     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Baum, S. R., & Leonard, C. L. (1999). Automatic versus strategic effects of phonology and orthography on auditory lexical access in brain-damaged patients as a function of inter-stimulus interval. Cortex, 35, 647-660.
2. Beauregard, M., Chertkow, H., Bub, D., Murtha, S., Dixon, R., & Evans, A. (1997). The neural substrate for concrete, abstract, and emotional word lexica: A positron emission tomography study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 441-461.
3. Behrmann, M., Plaut, D. C., & Nelson, J. (1998). A review and new data supporting an interactive account of letter-by-letter reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 7-51.
4. Binder, J. R., & Mohr, J. P. (1992). The topography of callosal reading pathways. Brain, 115, 1807-1826.
5. Bookheimer, S. Y., Zeffiro, T. A., Blaxton, T., Gaillard, W., & Theodore, W. (1995). Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading. Human Brain Mapping, 3, 93-106.
6. Burt, J. S., & Tate, H. (2002). Does a reading lexicon provide orthographic representations for spelling? Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 518-543.
7. Caramazza, A. (1988). Some aspects of language processing revealed through the analysis of acquired aphasia: The lexical system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 11, 395-421.
8. Carr, T. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice 5 (pp. 1-82). San Diego: Academic Press.
9. Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
10. Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehéricy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Henaff, M. A., & Michel, F. (2000). The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123, 291-307.
11. Cohen, L., Lehéricy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area. Brain, 125, 1054-1069.
12. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1991). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
13. Dehaene, S., Le Clec'H, G., Poline, J.B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L. (2002). The visual word form area: A prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus. NeuroReport, 13, 321-325.
14. Dejerine, J. (1892). Contribution a l'etude anatomopathologique et clinique des differentes varietes de cecite verbale. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances et Memoires de la Societe de Biologie, 4, 61-90.
15. Donnenwerth-Nolan, S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1981). Multiple code activation in word recognition: Evidence from rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 170-180.
16. Dronkers, N. F., Redfern, B. B., & Ludy, C. (1998). Brain regions associated with conduction aphasia and echoic rehearsal. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 23-24.
17. Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Goswami, U. (1999). Integrating orthographic and phonological knowledge as reading develops: Onsets, rimes and analogies in children's reading. In R. M. Klein & P. A. McMullen (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia (pp. 57-75). Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Herbster, A. N., Mintun, M. A., Nebes, R. D., & Becker, J. T. (1997). Regional cerebral blood flow during word and nonword reading. Human Brain Mapping, 5, 84-92.
20. Howard, D., Patterson, K., Wise, R., Brown, W. D., Friston, K., Weiller, C., & Frackowiak, R. (1992). The cortical localization of the lexicons: Positron emission tomography evidence. Brain, 115, 1769-1782.
21. Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1994). Models of word recognition - sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1311-1334.
22. Jakimik, J., Cole, R., & Rudnicky, A. (1985). Sound and spelling in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 165-178.
23. Kramer, A. F., & Donchin, E. (1987). Brain potentials as indices of orthographic and phonological interaction during word matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 76-86.
24. Larsen, J., Baynes, K., & Swick, D. (submitted). Right hemisphere reading mechanisms in a global alexic patient.
25. Leonard, C. L., & Baum, S. R. (1997). The influence of phonological and orthographic information on auditory lexical access in brain-damaged patients: A preliminary investigation. Aphasiology, 11, 1031-1041.
26. Menard, M. T., Kosslyn, S., Thompson, W. L., Alpert, N. M., & Rauch, S. L. (1996). Encoding words and pictures: A positron emission tomography study. Neuropsychologia, 34, 185-194.
27. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1998). Varieties of pure alexia: The case of failure to access graphemic representations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 203-238.
28. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
29. Mycroft, R. H., Mitchell, D. C., & Kay, J. (2002). An evaluation of statistical procedures for comparing an individual's performance with that of controls. Neuropsychologia, 19, 291-299.
30. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 299-370.
31. Patterson, K., & Kay, J. (1982). Letter-by-letter reading: Psychological descriptions of a neurological syndrome. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 411-441.
32. Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Posner, M. I., Mintun, M., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature, 331, 585-589.
33. Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Snyder, A. Z., & Raichle, M. E. (1990). Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli. Science, 249, 1041-1044.
34. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
35. Polk, T. A., & Farah, M. J. (2002). Functional MRI evidence for an abstract, not perceptual, word-form area. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 65-72.
36. Price, C. J., Wise, R. J. S., Watson, J. D. G., Patterson, K., Howard, D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994). Brain activity during reading: The effects of exposure duration and task. Brain, 117, 1255-1269.
37. Saffran, E. M., & Coslett, H. B. (1998). Reading in pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 141-165.
38. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
39. Seidenberg, M. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546-554.
40. Shulman, H., Hornak, R., & Sanders, M. (1978). The effects of graphemic, phonetic, and semantic relationships on access to lexical structures. Memory and Cognition, 6, 115-123.
41. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
42. Tainturier, M-J., & Rapp, B. (2001). The spelling process. In B. Rapp (Ed.), The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 263-289). Philadelphia: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
43. Tanenhaus, M. K., Flanigan, H. P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1980). Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 8, 513-520.
44. Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1997). Can children and adults focus on sounds as opposed to spelling in a phoneme counting task? Developmental Psychology, 33, 771-780.
45. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1980). Word-form dyslexia. Brain, 103, 99-112.
46. Zecker, S. G. (1991). The orthographic code: Developmental trends in reading-disabled and normally-achieving children. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 178-192.
47. Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 683-689.