Peripheral MR angiography

Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 280-315

  Loewe, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERY; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0043163391     PISSN: 08872171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0887-2171(03)90017-5     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. Carpenter JP, Owen RS, Baum RA, et al: Magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral runoff vessels. J Vasc Sug 16:807-815, 1992
2. Vosshenrich R, Fischer U, Funke M, et al: 2-D-Time-of-Flight MR angiography of the peripheral vessels in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Experimental and clinical results. Fortschr. Roentgenstr. 164:25-30, 1996
3. Glickerman DJ, Obregon RG, Schmiedl UP, et al: Cardiac-gated MR angiography of the entire lower extremity: A prospective comparison with conventional angiography. Am J Roentgenol 167:445-451, 1996
4. Vosshenrich R, Kopka L, Castillo E, et al: Electrocardiograph-triggered two-dimensional time-of-flight versus optimized contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the peripheral arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 16:887-92, 1998
5. Reimer P, Wilhelm M, Lentschig M, et al: Combined use of ECK-triggered 2D-phase contrast MR angiography and 2D-time-of-flight MR angiography for planning and follow up before and after vascular intervention of pelvic and leg arteries. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 168:243-9, 1998
6. Ho KY, de Haan MW, Oei TK, et al: MR angiography of the iliac and upper femoral arteries using four different inflow techniques. Am J Roentegnol 169:45-53, 1997
7. Hoch JR, Tullis MJ, Kennell TW, et al: Use of magnetic resonance angiography for the preoperative evaluation of patients with infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 23:792-801, 1996
8. Lee HM, Wang Y, Sostman HD, et al: Distal lower extremity arteries: Evaluation with two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 207:505-512, 1998
9. Leyendecker JR, Johnson SP, Diffin DC, et al. Time-of-Flight MR arteriography of below-knee arteries with Maximum-Intensity-Projection reconstruction: Is interpretation of the axial source images helpful? Am J Roentgenol 169:1145-1149, 1997
10. Masui T, Caputo GR, Bowersox JC, et al. Assessment of popliteal arterial occlusive disease with 2D Time-of-Flight MRA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:449-454, 1995
11. Owen RS, Baum RA, Carpenter JP, et al. Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease: selection of imaging parameters and clinical evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology 187:627-635, 1993
12. Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral occlusive disease. N Engl J Med 326:1577-1581, 1992
13. Yucel EK, Kaufmann JA, Geller SC, Waltman AC. Atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremity: Prospective evaluation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR Angiography. Radiology 187:637-641, 1993
14. Goyen M, Heuser LJG. Improved peripheral MRA using multi-velocity-encoding phase contrast-enhanced MRA techniques. Acta Radiologica 41:134-141, 2000
15. Reimer P, Boos M. Phase-contrast MR angiography of peripheral arteries: technique and clinical application. European Radiol 9:122-127, 1999
16. Steffens JC, Link J, Müller-Hülsbeck S, et al. Cardiac-gated two-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography of lower extremity occlusive disease. Am J Roentgenol 169:749-754, 1997
17. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 191:155-164, 1994
18. Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Neufang A, et al. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol 174:171-179, 2000
19. Poon E, Yucel EK, Pagan-Marin H, Kayne H. Iliac artery stenosis measurements: Comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography. Am J Roentgenol 169:1139-1144, 1997
20. Quinn SF, Sheley R, Semonson KG, et al. Aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: evaluation with MR angiography versus conventional angiography. Radiology 206:693-701, 1998
21. Busch HP, Hoffmann HG, Metzner C, Oettinger W. MR angiography of the lower extremities with an automatic table translation (Mobitrak) compared to i.a. DSA. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 170:275-283, 1999
22. Ho KYJAM, Leiner T, de Haan MW, et al: Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: Evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 206:683-692, 1998
23. Loewe C, Schoder M, Rand T, et al. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients. Am J Roentgenol. 179:1013-1021, 2002
24. Meaney JFM, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 211:59-67, 1999
25. Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, et al: Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: Value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. Am J Roentgenol 431-437, 1995
26. Earls JP, Patel NH, Smith PA, et al: Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral arteries: Evaluation of a multistation examination using two gadopentetate dimeglumine infusions. Am J Roentgenol 171:599-604, 1998
27. Hany TF, Carroll TJ, Omary RA, et al: Aorta and runoff vessels: Single-injection MR angiography with automated table movement compared with multiinjection time-resolved MR angiography:- Initial results. Radiology 221:226-272, 2001
28. Huber A, Heuck A, Baur A. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography from the distal aorta to the ankle joint with a step-by-step technique. Am J Roentgenol 175:1291-1298, 2000
29. Pandharipande PV, Lee VS, Reuss PM, et al. Two-station bolus-chase MR angiography with a stationary table: A simple alternative to automated-table technique. Am J Roentgenol 179:1583-1589, 2002
30. Ruehm S, Hany TF, Pfammatter T, et al. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: Diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Am J Roentgenol 174:1127-1135, 2000
31. Schoenberg S, Londy F, Licato P, et al. Multiphase-multistep gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and runoff vessels. Invest Radiol 36:283-291, 2001
32. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: Comparison of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology 210:683-688, 1999
33. Ho VB, Choyke PL, Foo TKF, et al. Automated bolus chase peripheral MR angiography: Initial practical experiences and future directions of this work-in-progress. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:376-388, 1999
34. Khilnani NM, Winchester PA, Prince MR. Peripheral vascular disease: Combined 3D bolus chase and dynamic 2D MR angiography compared with X-ray angiography for treatment planning. Radiology 224:63-74, 2002
35. Leiner T, Ho KYJAM, Nelemans PJ, et al: Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-bed infusion-tracking (MobiTrak) peripheral MR angiography with flexible choice of imaging parameters for each field of view. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:368-377, 2000
36. Wang Y, Lee HM, Khilnani NM, et al. Bolus-chase MR digital subtraction angiography in the lower extremity. Radiology 207:263-269, 1998
37. Foo TKF, Ho VB, Hood MN, et al. High-spatial-resolution multistation MR imaging of lower-extremity peripheral vasculature with segmented volume acquisition: feasibility study. Radiology 219:835-841, 2001
38. Ho KYJAM, de Haan MW, Kessels AGH, et al: Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: Detection with subtracted and non-subtracted MR angiography. Radiology 206:673-681, 1998
39. Leung DA, Pelkonen P, Hany TF, et al. Value of image subtraction in 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:598-602, 1998
40. Goyen M, Quick HH, Debatin JF, et al. Whole body three-dimensional MR angiography with a rolling table platform: Initial clinical experience. Radiology 224:270-277, 2002
41. Shetty AN, Bis KG, Duerinckx AJ, et al. Lower extremity MR angiography: Universal retrofitting of high-field-strength systems with stepping kinematic imaging platforms: Initial experience. Radiology 222:284-291, 2002
42. Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, et al. Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: Usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 210:705-710, 1996
43. Wang Y, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM. Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography from the abdominal aorta to the pedal arteries. Combined dynamic two-dimensional and bolus-chase three-dimensional acquisitions. Invest Radiol 36:170-177, 2001
44. Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Ademan MA, et al: Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 205:163-169, 1997
45. Svensson J, Petersson J, Stahlberg F, et al. Image artifacts due to a time-varying contrast medium concentration in 3D contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:919-928, 1999
46. Maki JH, Chenevert TL, Prince MR. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Abdominal imaging 23:469-484, 1998
47. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, Huston J, et al. Arterial phase carotid and vertebral artery imaging in 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography by combining flouroscopic triggering with an elliptical centric acquisition order. Magn Reson Med 40:24-35, 1998
48. Prince MR, Chabra SG, Watts R, et al. Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography. Radiology 224:55-61, 2002
49. Swan JS, Carroll TJ, Kennell TW, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Radiology 225:43-52, 2002
50. Turski PA, Korosec FR, Carroll TJ, et al: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid bifurcation using the time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) technique. Topics Magn Res Imaging 12:175-181, 2001
51. Willinke WA, Gieseke J, Conrad R, et al. Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortice arteries: Initial experience. Radiology 225:583-588, 2002
52. Watts R, Wang Y, Prince MR, et al. Anatomically tailored k-space sampling for bolus-chase three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 218:899-904, 2001
53. Janka R, Fellner F, Fellner C, et al. Dedicated phased-array coil for peripheral MRA. European Radiol 10:1745-1749, 2000
54. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, et al. Utilizing SENSE to achieve lower station sub-millimeter isotropic resolution and minimal venous enhancement in peripheral MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:484-491, 2002
55. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HCW, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology 217:105-114, 2000
56. Wang Y, Chen CZ, Winchester PA, et al. Bolus arterial-venous transit in the lower extremity and venous contamination in bolus chase three-dimensional magnetic resoncne angiography. Invest Radiol 37:458-463, 2002
57. Sharafuddin MJ, Stolpen AH, Sun S, et al. High-resolution multiphase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography compared with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography of the pedal vessels. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:695-702, 2002
58. Hood MN, Ho VB, Foo TKF, et al. High-resolution gadolinium-enhanced 3D MRA of the infrapopliteal arteries: Lessons for improving bolus-chase peripheral MRA. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 20:543-549, 2002
59. Yoo SK, Watts R, Winchester PA, et al. Postprocessing techniques for time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 222:564-568, 2002
60. Fowkes FGR, Housley E, Cawood EH, et al. Edinburgh artery study: Prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the general population. Int J Epidemiol 20:384-392, 1991
61. Stoffers HEJH, Kaiser V, Knottnerus JA: Prevalence in general practice, in. Fowkes FGR (ed): Epidemiology of Disease. London, Springer-Verlag, 1991 pp 109-115.
62. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 197:785-792, 1995
63. TASC Working Group: TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC): Management of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). J Vasc Surg 31:1 2000 (suppl 1) 2000
64. Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Holland GA, et al. Peripheral vascular surgery with magnitic resonance angiography as the sole preoperative imaging modality. J Vasc Surg 20; 861-871, 1994
65. Gambria RP, Yucel EK, Brewster DC, et al. The potential for lower extremity revascularization without contrast arteriography: Experience with magnetic resonance angiography. J Vasc Surg 17:1050-1057, 1993
66. Levy MM, Baum RA, Carpenter JP: Endovascular surgery based solely on non-invasive preprocedural imaging. J Vasc Surg 28:995-1005, 1998
67. Davies CP, Schöpke WD, Seifert B, et al. MR angiography of patients with peripheral arterial disease before and after transluminal angioplasty. Am J Roentgenol 168:1027-1034, 1997
68. Hertz SM, Baum RA, Holland GA, et al. Magnetic resonance angiographic imaging of angioplasty and atherectomy sites. J Cardiovasc Surg 35:1-6, 1994
69. Juergens KU, Tombacj B, Reimer P, et al. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR-angiography of endovascular covered stents in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Am J Roentenol 176:1299-1303, 2001
70. Link J, Steffens JC, Brossmann J. Iliofemoral arterial occlusive disease: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography for pre-interventional evaluation and follow-up after stent placement
71. Arnold TE, Kerstein MD. Secondary distal extension of infrainguinal bypaa: Long-term limb and patient survival. Ann Vasc Surg 14:450-456, 2000
72. Laundry GJ, Moneta GL, Taylor LM, et al: Long-term outcome of revised lower-extremity bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg 35:56-63, 2002
73. Mills JL, Wixon CL, Lames DC, et al: The natural history of intermediate and critical vein graft stenosis: Recommendations for continued surveillance or repair. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:273-280
74. Watson HR, Belcher G, Horrocks M. Reintervention as a clinical trial enpont after peripheral arterial bypass surgery. Brit J Surg 2001;88:1376-1381
75. Berkowitz HD, Fox AD, Deaton DH. Reversed vein graft stenosis: Early diagnosis and management. J Vasc Surg 15:130-142, 1992
76. Green RM, Ouriel K, Ricotta JJ, et al: Revision of failed infrainguinal bypass graft: Principles of management. Surgery 100:646-654, 1986
77. Hoksbergen AWJ, Legemate DA, Reekers JA, et al: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of peripheral bypass stenoses. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 22:282-286, 1999
78. Lundell A, Lindblad B, Bergqvist D, et al: Femoropopliteal-crural graft patency is improved by an intensive surveillance program: A prospective randomized study. J Vasc Surg 21:26-34, 1985
79. Beidle TR, Brom-Ferral R, Letoumeau JG. Surveillance of infrainguinal vein grafts with duplex sonography. Am J Roentgenol 162:443-448, 1994
80. Calligaro KD, Syrek JR, Dougherty MJ, et al: Selective use of duplex ultrasound to replace preoperative arteriography for failing arterial vein grafts. J Vasc Surg 27:89-95, 1998
81. Roth SM, Bandyk DF. Duplex scanning of lower extremity bypasses, angioplasties and stents. Sem Vasc Surg 12:275-284, 1999
82. Laundry GJ, Moneta GL, Taylor LM, et al: Duplex scanning alone is not sufficient imaging before secondary procedures after lower extremity reversed vein bypass graft. J Vasc Surg 29:270-281, 1999
83. Idu MM, Buth J, Hop WCJ, et al: Vein graft surveillance: Is graft revision without angiography justified and what criteria should be used? J Vasc Surg 27:399-413, 1998
84. Bendib K, Berthezene Y, Croisille P, et al: Assessment of complicated arterial bypass grafts: Value of contrast-enhanced subtraction magnetic resonance angiography. J Vasc Surg 26:1036-1042, 1997
85. Bertschinger K, Cassina PC, Debatin,J, et al: Surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with three-dimensional MR angiography: Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography. Am J Roentgenol 176:215-220, 2001
86. Krinsky G, Jacobowitz G, Rofsky N. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of extraanatomic arterial bypass grafts. Am J Roentgenol 170:735-741, 1998
87. Loewe C, Cejna M, Lammer J, et al: Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of peripheral bypass grafts. Eur Radiol 10:725-732, 2000
88. Rijswijk CSP, Linden E, Woude HJ, et al. Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in diagnosing and classifying peripheral vascular malformation. Am J Roentgenol 178:1181-1187
89. Reid SK, Pagan-Martin HR, Menzoian JO, et al. Contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography: Prospective comparison to catheter arteriography for treatment planning in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:45-53, 2001
90. Winterer JT, Laubenberger J, Scheffler K, et al. Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: Results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:583-589, 1999
91. Visser K, Hunink MGM. Peripheral arterial disease: Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus color-guided duplex US. A meta-analysis. Radiology 216:67-77, 2000