Two-station bolus-chase MR angiography with a stationary table: A simple alternative to automated-table techniques

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 179, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1583-1589

  Pandharipande, Pari V ^a   Lee, Vivian S ^a   Reuss, Peter M ^a   Charles, Hearns W ^a   Rosen, Robert J ^a   Krinsky, Glenn A ^a   Weinreb, Jeffrey C ^a   Rofsky, Neil M ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL OCCLUSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENOSIS; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0036891773     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.179.6.1791583     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Perloff LJ, Cope C. Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. N Engl J Med 1992;326: 1577-1581.
2. Baum RA, Rutter CM, Sunshine JH, et al. Multicenter trial to evaluate vascular magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. American College of Radiology Rapid Technology Assessment Group. JAMA 1995:274:875-880.
3. Huber A, Heuck A, Baur A, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography from the distal aorta to the ankle joint with a step-by-step technique. AJR 2000;175:1291-1298.
4. Winterer JT, Laubenberger J, Scheffler K, et al. Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: Results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999:23:583-589.
5. Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Semonsen KG, Leonardo VJ, Kojima K, Szumowski J. Aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: Evaluation with MR angiography versus conventional angiography. Radiology 1998;206:693-701.
6. Glickerman DJ, Obregon RG, Schmeiedl UP, et al. Cardiac-gated MR angiography of the entire lower extremity: A prospective comparison with conventional angiography. AJR 1996;167:445-451.
7. Rofsky NM, Adelman MA, MR angiography in the evaluation of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. Radiology 2000;214:325-338.
8. Earls JP, Patel NH, Smith PA, DeSena S, Meissner MH. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral arteries: Evaluation of a multistation examination using two gadopentetate dimeglumine infusions. AJR 1998; 171:599-604.
9. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ. van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: Evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:683-692.
10. Ruehm SG, Hany TF, Pfammatter T, Schneider E, Ladd M, Debatin JF. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: Diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR 2000;174:1127-1135.
11. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: Preliminary experience. Radiology 1999; 211:59-67.
12. Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Barkhausen J, et al. Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis. Lancet 2001;357:1086-1091.
13. Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Quick HH, et al. Whole-body MRA on a rolling table platform (Angio-SURF) (in German). Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2000;172:670-674.
14. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: Comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology 1997;204:357-362.
15. Poon E, Yucel EK, Pagan-Marin H, Kayne H. Iliac artery stenosis measurements: Comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR 1997;169:1139-1144.
16. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: Comparison of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiogmphy and conventional angiography. Radiology 1999;210:683-688.
17. Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Adelman MA, Rosen RJ, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997;205:163-169.
18. Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Breath-hold single dose Gd-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography; usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 1996;201:705-710.
19. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995;197:785-792.
20. Landis JR, Koch GG. Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977:33:159-174.
21. Rosner B. Fandamentals of Biostatistics. Boston: Duxbury. 1995:423-426.