Using technology to study human interaction: Practice and implications of a sequential behavior approach

Quest

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 389-401

  Sharpe, Tom ^a   Hawkins, Andrew H ^b   Lounsbery, Monica ^c  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042290217     PISSN: 00336297     EISSN: 15432750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00336297.1998.10484295     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J.M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20,37-46.
3. Darst, PW., Zakrajsek, D.B., & Mancini, V.H. (1989). Analyzing physical education and sport instruction (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
4. Dawe, H.A. (1984). Teaching: Social science or performing art? Harvard Educational Review, 54, 111-114.
5. Dwyer, D. (1996). We're in this together. Educational Leadership, 54(3), 24-26.
6. Eisner, E.W. (1983). The art and craft of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40,4-13.
7. Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Knopf.
8. Gottman, J.M., & Roy, A.K. (1990). Sequential analysis: A guide for behavioral researchers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Heward, W.L., & Cooper, J.O. (1992). Radical behaviorism: Aproductive and needed philosophy for education. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24,345-365.
10. Johnston, J.M., & Pennypacker, H.S. (1980). Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Kantor, J.R. (1969). The scient$c evolution ofpsychology (Vol. 2). Chicago: Principia Press.
12. Kantor, J.R. (1979). Psychology: Science or nonscience? The Psychological Record, 29, 155-163.
13. Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Locke, L.F. (1992). Field systems research: Sport pedagogy perspectives. Joumal of Teaching in Physical Education, 12,85-89.
15. Moms, E.K. (1992). ABApresidential address: The aim, progress, and evolution of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 3-29.
16. Neitzche, F.W. (1978). Thus spake Zarathustra. New York: Penguin Books.
17. Ray, R.D. (1992). Interbehavioral methodology: Lessons from simulation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 12, 105-114.
18. Ray, R.D., & Delprato, D.J. (1989). Behavioral systems analysis: Methodological strategies and tactics. Behavioral Science, 34, 81-127.
19. Rubin, L.J. (1985). Artistry in teaching. New York: Random House.
20. Sharpe, T.L. (1992). Teacher preparation-A professional development school approach. Joumal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 63,82-87.
21. Sharpe, T.L. (1997a). Using technology in presemice teacher supervision. The Physical Educator, 54, 11-19.
22. Sharpe, T.L. (1997b). An introduction to sequential behavior analysis and what it offers physical education teacher education researchers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16,368-375.
23. Sharpe, T.L., & Hawkins, A. (1992a). Field systems analysis: Prioritizing patterns in time and context among observable variables. Quest, 44, 15-34.
24. Sharpe, T.L., & Hawkins, A. (1992b). Expert and novice elementary specialists: A comparative analysis [Monograph]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 12,55-75.
25. Sharpe, T.L., & Hawkins, A. (1992) The implications of field systems for teacher education [Monograph]. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 12,76-84.
26. Sharpe, T.L., & Hawkins, A. (1998). Technology and the information age: Acautionary tale for higher education. Quest, 50, 19-32.
27. Sharpe, T.L., & Koperwas, J. (1996). Collection and analysisprogram for systematic observation: Afield systems approach (including reliability, graphics editing, and across data-jile analyses) (2nd ed.). West Lafayette, IN: Educational Consulting.
28. Sharpe, T.L., & Lounsbery, M. (1998). The effects of a sequential behavior analysis protocol on the teaching practices of undergraduate trainees. School Psychology Quarterly, 12,327-343.
29. Sharpe, T.L., Lounsbery, M., & Bahls, V. (1997). Description and effects of sequential behavior practice in teacher education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 222-232.
30. Sharpe, T.L., Lounsbery, M., & Templin, T. (1997). "Cooperation, collegiality, and collaboration": Reinforcing the PETE scholar-practitioner model. Quest, 49,214-228.
31. Sharpe, T.L., Spies, R., Newman, R., & Spickelmier-Vallin, D. (1996). Assessing and improving the accuracy of inservice teachers perceptions of daily practice. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 297-318.
32. Skinner, B.F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
33. van der Mars, H. (1989). Systematic observation: An introduction [and] basic recording tactics. In P.W. Darst, D.B. Zakrajsek, & V.H. Mancini (Eds.), Analyzing physical education and sport instruction (pp. 3-52). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.