Constraints on definite article alternation in speech production: To "thee" or not to "thee"?

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 715-727

  Gaskell, M Gareth ^a   Cox, Helen ^a   Foley, Katherine ^a   Grieve, Helen ^a   O'Brien, Rachel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0042161565     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196110     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & VAN RIJN, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
2. BELL, A., JURAFSKY, D., FOSLER-LUSSIER, E., GIRAND, C., & GILDEA, D. (1999). Forms of English function words: Effects of disfluencies, turn position, age and sex, and predictability. In Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 395-398). Berkeley: University of California, Linguistics Department.
3. BROWMAN, C. P., & GOLDSTEIN, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155-180.
4. BRUCK, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874-886.
5. BYBEE, J. [L.] (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language & Cognitive Processes, 10, 425-455.
6. BYBEE, J. L., & SLOBIN, D. I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58, 265-289.
7. DAMIAN, M. F., & BOWERS, J. S. (2003). Effects of orthography on speech production in a form preparation paradigm. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 119-132.
8. DIJKSTRA, T., ROELOFS, A., & FIEUWS, S. (1995). Orthographic effects on phoneme monitoring. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 264-271.
9. FORSTER, K. I., & FORSTER, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-224.
10. Fox TREE, J., & CLARK, H. (1997). Producing "the" as "thee" to signal problems in speaking. Cognition, 16, 151-167.
11. GODFREY, J., HOLLIMAN, E., & MCDANIEL, J. (1992). SWITCH-BOARD: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, & Signal Processing '92 (pp. 517-520). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
12. GOSWAMI, U., & BRYANT, P. E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
13. GUY, G., & BOYD, S. (1990). The development of a morphological class. Language Variation & Change, 2, 1-18.
14. HALLÉ, P. A., CHÉREAU, C., & SEGUI, J. (2000). Where is the /b/ in "absurde" [apsyrd]? It is in French listeners' minds. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 618-639.
15. HARE, M., & ELMAN, J. L. (1995). Learning and morphological change. Cognition, 56, 61-98.
16. JAKOBSON, R., FANT, G., & HALLE, M. (1952). Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. JURAFSKY, D., BELL, A., FOSLER-LUSSIER, E., GIRAND, C., & RAYMOND, W. (1998). Reduction of English function words in Switchboard. In R. H. Mannell & J. Robert-Ribes (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 3111-3114). Sydney: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.
18. KEATING, P., BYRD, D., FLEMING, E., & TODAKA, Y. (1994). Phonetic analysis of the TIMIT corpus of American English. Speech Communications, 14, 131-142.
19. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
20. LABOV, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45, 715-762.
21. LEVELT, W. J. M., ROELOFS, A., & MEYER, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
22. LUKATELA, G., EATON, T., LEE, C., & TURVEY, M. T. (2001). Does visual word identification involve a sub-phonemic level? Cognition, 78, B41-B52.
23. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331-353.
24. MARATSOS, M. (2000). More overregularizations after all: New data and discussion on Marcus, Pinker, Ullman, Hollander, Rosen & Xu. Journal of Child Language, 27, 183-212.
25. MARCUS, G. F., PINKER, S., ULLMAN, M., HOLLANDER, M., ROSEN, T. J., & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language-acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57, R5-R165.
26. MATHEWS, R. C., BUSS, R. R., STANLEY, W. B., BLANCHARD-FIELDS, F., CHO, J. R., & DRUHAN, B. (1989). Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1083-1100.
27. McCLELLAND, J. L., & PATTERSON, K. (2002). Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 465-472.
28. MORAIS, J., & KOLINSKY, R. (1994). Perception and awareness in phonological processing: The case of the phoneme. Cognition, 50, 287-297.
29. PINKER, S., & ULLMAN, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 456-463.
30. RAYMOND, W. D., FISHER, J. A., & HEALY, A. F. (2002), Linguistic knowledge and language performance in English article variant preference. Language & Cognitive Processes, 17, 613-662.
31. REBER, A. S. (1997). Implicit ruminations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 49-55.
32. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5, 546-554.
33. SELKIRK, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. SERWATKA, M., & HEALY, A. F. (1998). On the status of the count-mass distinction in the mental grammar. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 113-158). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. STONE, G. O., VANHOY, M., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 337-359.
36. TODAKA, Y. (1992). Phonetic variants of the determiner "the." UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 81, 39-47.
37. TREIMAN, R., & CASSAR, M. (1997). Can children and adults focus on sound as opposed to spelling in a phoneme counting task? Developmental Psychology, 33, 771-780.
38. VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
39. WULF, G., McNEVIN, N., & SHEA, C. H. (2001). The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1143-1154.
40. ZIEGLER, J. C., & FERRAND, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 683-689.