The contribution of task performance and contextual performance to effectiveness: Investigating the role of situational constraints

Applied Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 517-533

  Griffin, Mark A ^a   Neal, Andrew ^b   Neale, Matthew ^b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040780709     PISSN: 0269994X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1464-0597.00029     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adler, S. (1996). Personality and work behavior: Exploring the linkages. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45, 207-224.
2. Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
3. Allen, T.D., & Rush, M.C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247-260.
4. Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M.K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111-118.
5. Bateman, T.S., & Organ, D.W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee "citizenship". Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595.
6. Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W.C. Borman, and Asssociates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-89). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99-109.
8. Brief, A.P., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710-725.
9. Campbell, J.P., Gasser, M.B., & Oswald, F.L. (1996). The substantive nature of job performance variability. In K.R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 258-299). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Campbell, J.P., McCloy, R.A., Oppler, S.H., & Sager, C.E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt, W.C. Borman, and Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Conway, J.M. (1999). Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 3-13.
12. Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1995). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 37-63.
13. George, J.M., & Brief, A.P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 310-329.
14. Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
15. Kiker, D.S., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1999). Main and interaction effects of task and contextual performance on supervisory reward decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 602-609.
16. McManus, M.A., & Kelly, M.L. (1999). Personality measures and biodata: Evidence regarding their incremental predictive value in the life insurance industry. Personnel Psychology, 52, 137-148.
17. Motowidlo, S.J., Borman, W.C., & Schmit, M.J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71-83.
18. Neal, A., & Griffin, M.A. (1999). Developing a theory of performance for human resource management. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 37, 44-60.
19. Neal, A., Griffin, M.A., Neale, M., Bamford, E., & Boag, C. (1998). Human factors issues in the transition to a CNS/ATM environment: Final report. Report prepared for Airservices Australia.
20. Neal, A., Griffin, M.A., Paterson, J., & Bordia, P. (in press). Development of measures of situation awareness, task performance, and contextual performance in Air Traffic Control. In A.R. Lowe & B.J. Hayward (Eds.), Aviation resource management (Vol. 2). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
21. Ostroff, C. (1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organization level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 963-974.
22. Sackett, P.R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1988). Relations between measures of typical and maximal performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 336-342.
23. Van Scotter, J.R., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525-531.
24. Weiss, H.M., & Adler, S. (1984). Personality and organizational behavior. In B.M. Straw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 1-50). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.