Response to literature as a cultural activity

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 64-73

  Galda, Lee ^a   Beach, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040030151     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/rrq.36.1.4     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. ALMASI, J.F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literaure. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314-351.
2. ALMASI, J.F., ANDERSON, E., RUSSELL. W.S., & GUTHRIE, J.T. (1998 December). Scaffold to nowhere? Appropriated voice, metatalk, and personal narrative in third graders' peer discussions of informational text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
3. ALVERMANN, D.E., COMMEYRAS, M., YOUNG, J.P., RANDALL, S., & HINSON, D. (1997). Interrupting gendered discursive practices in classroom talk about texts: Easy to think about, difficult to do. Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 73-104.
4. ALVERMANN, D.E., YOUNG, J.P., & GREEN, C. (1997). Adolescents' negotiations of out-of-school reading discussions. Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center.
5. ATHANASES, S.Z. (1998). Diverse learners, diverse texts: Exploring identity and difference through literary encounters. Journal of Literacy Research, 30, 273-296.
6. BARRELL, B., & HAMMETT, R. (1999). Hypermedia as a medium for textual resistance. English in Education, 33, 21-30.
7. BEACH, R. (1995). Constructing cultural models through response to literature. English Journal, 84, 87-94.
8. BEACH, R. (1997a). Critical discourse theory and reader response: How discourses constitute reader stances and social contexts. Reader, 37, 1-26.
9. BEACH, R. (1997b). Students' resistance to engagement in responding to multicultural literature. In T. Rogers & A. O. Soter (Eds.), Reading across cultures: Teaching literature in a diverse society. (pp. 69-94). New York: Teachers College Press.
10. BEACH, R. (2000). Reading and responding at the level of activity. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 237-251.
11. BEACH, R., EDDLESTON, S., & PHILIPPOT, R. (2000). Enhancing large-group literature discussions. Manuscript in preparation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
12. BEACH, R., & HYNDS, S. (1991). Research on response to literature. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume II, (pp. 453-491). New York: Longman.
13. BEACH, R., KALNIN, J., & LEER, E. (in preparation). High school students' construction of literary worlds. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
14. BEACH, R., & MYERS, J. (in press). Constructing social worlds in the English classroom: An inquiry-based approach. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. BEACH, R., & PHINNEY, M.Y. (1998). Framing literary text worlds through real-world social negotiation. Linguistics and Education, 9, 159-198.
16. BLAKE, B.E. (1998). "Critical" reader response in an urban classroom: Creating cultural texts to engage diverse readers. Theory Into Practice, 37, 238-243.
17. BLOOME, D., & EGAN-ROBERTSON, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in a classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 304-333.
18. BRUNER, J.S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. CAI, M. (1997). Reader response theory and the politics of multicultural literature. In T. Rogers & A.O. Soter (Eds.), Reading across cultures: Teaching literature in a diverse society (pp. 199-212). New York: Teachers College Press.
20. CHRISTIAN-SMITH, L.K. (1993). Texts of desire: Essays on fiction, femininity and schooling. London: Falmer.
21. COCHRAN-SMITH, M. (1984). The making of a reader. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. COLE, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. CORNIS-POPE, M. (2000). Hypertextual and networked communication in undergraduate literature classes: Strategies for an interactive critical pedagogy. In D. Hickey & D. Reiss (Eds.), Learning literature in an era of change: Innovations in teaching (pp. 152-167). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
24. CUSHMAN, K. (1994). Catherine, called Birdy. New York: HarperCollins.
25. EDELSKY, C. (1999). On critical whole language practices: Why, what, and a bit of how. In C. Edelsky (Ed.), Making justice our project: Teachers working toward critical whole language practice (pp. 7-36). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
26. EEDS, M., & WELLS, D. (1989). Grand conversations: An exploration of meaning construction in literature study groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 4-29.
27. ENCISO, P.E. (1994). Cultural identity and response to literature. Language Arts, 71, 524-533.
28. ENCISO, P.E. (1997). Negotiating the meaning of difference: Talking back to multicultural literature. In T. Rogers & A.O. Soter (Eds.), Reading across cultures: Teaching literature in a diverse society (pp. 13-41). New York: Teachers College Press.
29. ENCISO, P.E. (1998). Good/bad girls read together: Pre-adolescent girls' co-authorship of feminine subject positions during a shared event reading. English Education, 30, 44-62.
30. ENGESTROM, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
31. ENGESTROM, Y., MIETTINEN, R. & PUNANAKI, R. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. FINDERS, M.J. (1997). Just girls: Hidden literacies and life in junior high. New York: Teachers College Press.
33. FISH, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. FITZGERALD, F.S. (1953). The great Gatsby. New York: Scribners.
35. GALDA, L. (1982). Assuming the spectator stance: An examination of the responses of three young readers. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 1-20.
36. GALDA, L., ASH, G.E., & CULLINAN, B.E. (2000). Children's literature. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.). Handbook of reading research, Volume III (pp. 361-379) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. GALDA, L., RAYBURN, J.S., & STANZI, L.C. (2000). Looking through the faraway end: Creating a literature-based reading curriculum with second graders. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
38. GEE, J.P. (2000). Discourse and sociocultural studies in reading. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook on reading research, Volume III (pp. 195-207). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. GEE, J.P., & CRAWFORD, V. (1998). Two kinds of teenagers: Language, identity, and social class. In D.E. Alvermann, K.A. Hinchman, D.W. Moore, S.F. Phelps, & D.R. Waff (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (pp. 225-246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. HANCOCK, M.R. (1993). Exploring the meaning-making process through the content of literature response journals: A case study investigation. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 335-368.
41. HARPER, H. (2000). Wild words/dangerous desires: High school students and feminist avant-garde writing. New York: Peter Lang.
42. HARRIS, V.J. (1994). Multiculturalism and children's literature: An evaluation of ideology, publishing, curricula, and research. In C.K. Kinzer & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Multidimensional aspects of literacy research, theory, and practice. 43rd yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 15-27). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
43. HEMPHILL, L. (1999). Narrative style, social class, and response to poetry. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 275-302.
44. HICKMAN, J. (1981). A new perspective on response to literature: Research in an elementary school. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 343-354.
45. HOLLAND, D., & EISENHART, M. (1990). Educated in romance: Women, achievement, and college culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. HUNT, R.A. (1994). Speech genres, writing genres, school genres, and computer games. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Learning and teaching genre (pp. 243-262). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
47. HUNT, R.A., & VIPOND, D. (1991). First, catch the rabbit: Methodological imperative and the dramatization of dialogic reading. In R. Beach, J.L. Green, M.L. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 69-90). Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English/National Council of Teachers of English.
48. HYNDS, S. (1997). On the brink: Negotiating literature and life with adolescents. New York: Teachers College Press.
49. KAMBERELIS, G., & SCOTT, K.D. (1992). Other people's voices: The coarticulation of texts and subjectivities. Linguistics and Education, 4, 359-403.
50. KENT, T. (1993). Paralogic rhetoric. London: Associated University Press.
51. KNOELLER, C. (1998). Voicing ourselves: Whose words we use when we talk about books. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
52. KUCAN, L., & BECK, I.L. (1996). Four fourth graders thinking aloud: An investigation of genre effects. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 259-288.
53. LABOV, W. (1972). Language of the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
54. LEONT'EV, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
55. LEWIS, C. (1997). The social drama of literature discussions in a fifth/sixth grade classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 163-204.
56. MACKEY, M. (1997). Good-enough reading: Momentum and accuracy in the reading of complex fiction. Research in the Teaching of English 31, 428-459.
57. MANY, J.E., & WISEMAN, D.L. (1992). The effects of teaching approach on third-grade students' response to literature. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 265-287.
58. MARSHALL, J.D. (2000). Research on response to literature. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Volume III (pp. 381-402). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. MARSHALL, J.D., SMAGORINSKY, P., & SMITH, M.W. (1995). The language of interpretation: Patterns of discourse in discussions of literature. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
60. MARTINEZ, M.G., & ROSER, N.L. (in press). Children's responses to literature. In J. Flood, J. Jenson, D. Lapp, & J. Squire (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts, Volume II. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. MARTINEZ, M.G., ROSER, N.L., HOFFMAN, J.V., & BATTLE, J. (1992). Fostering better book discussions through response logs and a response framework: A case description. In C.K. Kinzer, & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory, and practice: views from many perspectives. 41st yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 303-311). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
62. MCGEE. L. M. (1992). An exploration of meaning construction in first graders' grand conversations. In C.K. Kinzer & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Literacy, research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives 41st yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 177-186). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
63. MCGEE, L.M., COURTNEY, L., & LOMAX, R. (1994). Supporting first graders' responses to literature: An analysis of teachers' roles in grand conversations. In C.K. Kinzer & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Multidimensional aspects of literacy research, theory, and practice. 43rd yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 517-526). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
64. MCGINLEY, W., & KAMBERELIS, G. (1996). Maniac Magee and Ragtime Tumpie: Children negotiating self and world through reading and writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 75-113.
65. MCKILLOP, A.M. , & MYERS, J. (2000). The pedagogical and electronic contexts of composing in hypermedia. In S.Z. DeWitt & K. Strasma (Eds.), Contexts, intertexts, and hypertexts (pp. 65-116). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
66. MCMAHON, S.I., RAPHAEL, T., GOATLEY, V., & PARDO, L. (1997). The book club connection: Literacy learning and classroom talk. New York: Teachers College Press.
67. MEHAN, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68. MELLOR, B., & PATTERSON, A. (2000). Critical practice: Teaching "Shakespeare." Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43, 508-517.
69. MILLER, S.M., & LEGGE, S. (1999). Supporting possible worlds: Transforming literature teaching and learning through conversation in the narrative mode. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 10-65.
70. MORRISON, T. (1994). The bluest eye. New York: Penguin.
71. MOSENTHAL, P.B. (1998). Reframing the problems of adolescence and adolescent literacy: A dilemma-management perspective. In D.E. Alvermann, K.A. Hinchman, D.W. Moore, S.F. Phelps, & D.R. Waff (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (pp. 325-352). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
72. NODELMAN, P. (1988). Words about pictures: The narrative art of children's picture books. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
73. NYSTRAND, M. (1999, Spring). The contexts of learning: Foundations of academic achievement. English Update: A Newsletter From the Center on English Learning and Achievement, pp. 2, 8.
74. O'FLAHAVAN, J.F. (1989). An exploration of the effects of participant structure upon literacy development in reading group discussion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
75. PAPPAS, C.C., & PETTEGREW, B.S. (1998). The role of genre in the psycholinguistic guessing game of reading. Language Arts, 75, 36-44.
76. POPE, R. (1995). Textual intervention: Critical and creative strategies for literacy studies. New York: Routledge.
77. PROULX, E.A. (1993). The shipping news. New York: MacMillan.
78. RABINOWITZ, P.J., & SMITH, M.W. (1998). Authorizing readers: Resistance and respect in the teaching of literature. New York: Teachers College Press.
79. RADWAY, J.A. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
80. RAPHAEL, T.E., & MCMAHON, S.I. (1994). Book club: An alternative framework for reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 48, 102-116.
81. ROGOFF, B., & TOMA, C. (1997). Shared thinking: Community and institutional variations. Discourse Processes, 23. 471-497.
82. SHINE, S., & ROSER, N.L. (1999). The role of genre in preschoolers' response to picture books. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 197-251.
83. SHORT, K. (1992). Researching intertextuality within collaborative classroom learning environments. Linguistics and Education, 4, 313-333.
84. SIMS, R. (1983). Strong black girls: A ten year old responds to fiction about Afro-Americans. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 16, 21-28.
85. SIMS, R. (1984). Point of view: A question of perspective. The Advocate, 4, 21-23.
86. SINGH, M.G., & GREENLAW, J. (1998). Postcolonial theory in the literature classroom: Contrapuntal readings. Theory Into Practice, 37, 193-202.
87. SIPE, L.R. (1998). Individual literary response styles of first and second graders. In T. Shanahan & F.V. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), 47th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 76-89). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
88. SIPE, L.R. (1999, Summer). Children's response to literature: Author, text, reader context. Theory into Practice, 38, 120-129.
89. SMAGORINSKY, P., & O'DONNELL-ALLEN, C. (1998). Reading as mediated and mediating action: Composing meaning for literature through multimedia interpretive texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 198-227.
90. SMITHSON, J., & DIAS, F. (1996). Arguing for a collective voice: Collaborative strategies in problem-oriented conversation. Text, 16, 251-268.
91. SPINELLI, J. (1991). Maniac Magee. Boston: Little, Brown.
92. SQUIRE, J. (1964). The responses of adolescents while reading four short stories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
93. STEPHENS, J. (1992). Language and ideology in children's fiction. New York: Longman.
94. SUMARA, D.J. (1996). Private readings in public: Schooling in the literary imagination. New York: Peter Lang.
95. SUTHERLAND, R. (1985). Hidden persuaders: Political ideologies in literature for children. Children's Literature in Education, 16, 143-157.
96. SVENSSON, C. (1990). The development of poetic understanding during adolescence. In R. Beach & S. Hynds (Eds.), Developing discourse practices in adolescence and adulthood (pp. 136-161). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
97. VINZ, R., GORDON, E., HAMILTON, G., LAMONTAGNE, J., & LUNDGREN, B. (2000). Becoming (other)wise: Enhancing critical reading perspectives. Portland, ME: Calendar Islands.
98. WELLS, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a socioculturalpractice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
99. WENGER, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
100. WERTSCH, J.R. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
101. WHITIN, P. (1996). Exploring visual response to literature. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 114-140.
102. WILHELM, J.D. (1997). "You gotta BE the book": Teaching engaged and reflective reading with adolescents. New York: Teachers College Press.
103. WILLINSKY, J., & HUNNIFORD. R. (1986). Reading the romance younger: The mirrors and fears of a preparatory literature. Reading-Canada-Lecture 4, 16-31.