Framing Literary Text Worlds through Real-World Social Negotiations

Linguistics and Education

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 159-198

  Beach, Richard ^a   Phinney, Margaret ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040925029     PISSN: 08985898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0898-5898(97)90012-7     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Alvermann, D., & Commeyras, M. (1994). Gender, text, and discussion: Expanding the possibilities. In R. Garner & P. Alexander (Ed.). Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 183-199). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Alvermann, D., Young, J., & Green, C. (1997). Adolescents' negotiations of out-of-school reading discussions. Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center.
3. Auer, P., & di Luzio, A. (1992). The contextualization of language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
6. Beach, R. (1993). A teacher's introduction to reader response theories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
7. Beach, R. (1995). Constructing cultural models through response to literature. English Journal, 84, 87-94
8. Beach, R. (1997a) Students' resistance to engagement with multicultural literature. In T. Rogers & A. Soter (Eds.), Reading across cultures: Teaching literature in a diverse society (pp. 69-94). New York; Teachers College Press.
9. Beach, R. (1997b). Critical discourse theory and reader response: How discourses constitute reader stances and social contexts. Reader, 37, 1-26.
10. Beach, R., Eddleston, S., & Philippot, R. (1998). Characteristics of effective large-group literature discussions. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota.
11. Beach, R., & Lundell, D. (1998). Early adolescents' use of computer-mediated communication in writing and reading. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Bennett, D., & Woollacott, J. (1987). Bond and beyond: The political career of a popular hero. London: Methuen.
13. Bergvall, V., & Remlinger, K. (1996). Reproduction, resistance and gender in educational discourse: the role of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society. 7(4), 453-479.
14. Bloome, D., & Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly. 28, 305-333.
15. Bloome, D. & Talwalkar, S. (1997). Book reviews: Critical discourse analysis and the study of reading and writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 104-112.
16. Bloome, D., Sheridan, D., & Street, B. (1995, March 7). Literacy, personhood, power, and the everyday lives of 'ordinary' people: Research with the Mass Observation Project. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
17. Brown, L. (1991). A problem of vision: The development of voice and relational knowledge in girls age seven to sixteen. Women's Studies Quarterly, 19, 52-71.
18. Buckingham, D. (1993). Boys' talk: Television and the policing of masculinity. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Reading audiences: Young people and the media (pp. 89-115). New York: Manchester University Press.
19. Cazden, C. (1997, March 27). Discussant response. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
20. Cherland, M. (1994). Private practices: Girls reading fiction and constructing identities. London: Taylor & Francis.
21. Chin, E. (1994). Redefining "context" in research on writing. Written Communication, 2(4), 445-482.
22. Christian, S. (1997). Exchanging lives: Middle school writers online. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 1997.
23. Cowley, M. (1988). The Great Gatsby. In A. Skillion (Ed.), Introducing the great American novel (pp. 127-142). New York: Stonesong Press.
24. Daiute, C. (1993). Youth genres and literacy: Links between sociocultural and developmental theories. Language Arts, 70, 402-416.
25. Diamondstone, J. (1997). Contested relations and authoritative texts: Seventh-grade students (1987) and legal professionals (1954) argue Brown v. Board of Education. Written Communication, 14, 189-220.
26. Davidson, D. (1984). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. New York: Clarendon Press.
27. Davies, B. (1993). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
28. Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C., (Eds.) (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
30. Eckert, P. (1995). Constructing meaning, constructing selves: Snapshots of language, gender, and class from Belton High. In K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 469-508). New York: Routledge.
31. Emmott, C. (1997). Narrative comprehension: A discourse perspective. New York: Clarendon Press.
32. Erickson, F. (1996). Going for the zone: The social and cognitive ecology of teacher-student interactions in classroom conversations. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 29-62). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Faigley, L. (1993). The fragments of rationality: Writing in a postmodern age. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
34. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. New York: Longman.
35. Fairclough, N. (1992). Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis. Linguistics and Education, 4, 269-294.
36. Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
37. Finders. M. (1997). Just girls: Hidden literacies and life in junior high. New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Fiske, J. (1993). Power plays power works. New York: Verso.
39. Fiske, J. (1994). Audiencing: Cultural practice and cultural studies. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 189-198). Beverly Hills: Sage.
40. Florianni, A. (1993). Negotiating what counts: Roles and relationships, texts and contexts, content and meaning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 241-274.
41. Forstop, M. (1990). Receiving and responding: Ways of taking from the Bible. In G. Hansson (Ed.), Bible reading in Sweden. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.
42. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
43. Fránquiz, M. (1997, March 27). Difference as resource: The role of talk in literature responses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
44. Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies., 2nd ed. New York: Falmer.
45. Gilligan, C. (1990). Teaching Shakespeare's sister: Notes from the underground of female adolescence. In C. Gilligan, N. Lyons, & T. Hammer (Eds.), Making connections: The relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
46. Giroux, H. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. South Hadley. MA: Bergin & Garvey.
47. Goffman, I. (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Gore, J. (1993). The struggle for pedagogy: Cultural and feminist discourses in regimes of truth. New York: Routledge.
49. Gore, J. (1995). Foucault's poststructuralism and observational education research. In R. Smith & P. Wexler (Eds.), After postmodernism: Education, politics and identity (pp. 98-111). London: Falmer.
50. Giumperz, J. (1992). Contextualization revisited. In P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 39-54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
51. Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans & participatory culture. New York: Routledge.
52. Jennings, L., & Pattenaude, I. (1997, March 27). Intertextual processes for learning tolerance: Expanding repertoires of meaning, language, and action. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
53. Jordan, S., & Purves, A. (1993). Issues in the responses of students to culturally diverse texts: ;\ preliminary study. Albany, NY: National Research Center on Literature Teaching and Learning.
54. Kent, T. (1993). Paralogic rhetoric. London: Associated University Press.
55. Kendon, A. (1992). The negotiation of context in face-to-face interaction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context(pp. 324-334). New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Knox-Quinn, C. (1995). Authentic classroom experiences: Anonymity, mystery, and improvisation in synchronous writing environments. Computers, Writing, Rhetoric and Literature, 1(2), 10-16.
57. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper.
58. Kreisberg, S. (1992). Transforming power: Domination, empowerment, and education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
59. Labov, W. (1972). Language of the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
60. Lankshear, C. (1997). Changing literacies. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
61. Lee, V. (1986). Responses of white students to ethnic literature. Reader, 15, 24-33.
62. Lemke, J. (1995), Textual politics. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
63. Lindstrom, L. (1992). Context contests: Debatable truth statements on Tanna (Vanuatu). In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon(pp. 101-124). New York: Cambridge University Press.
64. Mahlgren, D. (1990). Large fears, little demons. In D. Gallo (Ed.)., Center stage: One-act plays for teenage readers and actors (pp. 183-216). New York: HarperCollins.
65. Marshall, J., Smagorinsky, P., & Smith, M. (1995). The language of interpretation: Patterns of discourse in discussions of literature. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
66. Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3, 25-45.
67. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
68. Mizell, T. (1995). Wolf kin. Merlin's Pen, 24, 26-31.
69. Moss, G. (1989). Un/popular fictions. London: Virgo Press.
70. The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Education Review, 66, 60-92.
71. Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context(pp. 335-358). New York: Cambridge University Press.
72. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
73. O'Connor, M.C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63-104). New York: Cambridge University Press.
74. Peck, J. (1994). Talk about racism: Framing a popular discourse of race on Oprah Winfrey. Cultural Critique, 27, 89-126.
75. Peck, R. (1989). I go along. In D. Gallo (Ed.), Connections: Short stories by outstanding writers for young adults (pp. 184-191). New York: Dell.
76. Phinney, M. Y. (1994). Gender, status, writing, and the resolution of kindergarten girls' social tensions. Linguistics and Education, 6, pp. 311-330.
77. Phinney, M. Y. (1992). Writing, sociality, and identity in kindergarten: An ethnographic study. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
78. Pratt, M. L. (1987). Linguistic utopias. In N. Fabb, D. Attridge, A. Durant, & C. MacCabe (Eds.), The linguistics of writing (pp. 48-66). New York: Methuen.
79. Putney, L, & Yeager, B. (1997, March 27). Investigating social justice and talking social actions: Individual and community literate practices and processes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
80. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch. P. Del Rio, P., & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 129-164). New York: Cambridge University Press.
81. Rogoff, B., & Toma, C. (1997). Shared thinking: Community and institutional variations. Discourse Processes, 23, 471-497.
82. Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Edwardsville. IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
83. Rowe, D. W. (1994). Preschoolers as authors: Literacy learning in the social world of the classroom. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
84. Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504-554.
85. Sharmat, M. (1984). May I have your autograph? In D. Gallo (Ed.), Sixteen (pp. 15-21). New York: Delacorte.
86. Sharpe, R., Mascia-Lees, F., & Cohen, C. (1990). White women and black men: Differential responses to reading black women's tests. College English, 52, 142-158.
87. Sheldon, A. (1992a). Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic challenges to self-assertion and how young girls meet them. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38(1), 95-117.
88. Sheldon, A. (1992b). Preschool girls' discourse competence: Managing conflict. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, & B. Moonwomen (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference (pp. 528-539). Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, University of California.
89. Short, K., & Harste, J. (1996). Creating classrooms for authors and inquirers, 2nd ed. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
90. Smithson, J., & Dias, F. (1996). Arguing for a collective voice: Collaborative strategies in problem-oriented conversation. Text, 16(2), 251-268.
91. Simmons, J. (1997). Attack of the killer baby faces: Gender similarities in third-grade writing. Language Arts, 74(2), 116-123.
92. Sleeter, C. (1993), Advancing a white discourse: A response to Scheurich. Educational Researcher, 22, 13-15.
93. Spivey, N. (1997). The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing, and the making of meaning. San Diego: Academic Press.
94. Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
95. Tannen, D. (Ed.) (1993). Framing in discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
96. van Slyck, P. (1997). Repositioning ourselves in the contact zone. College English, 59 (2), 149-170.
97. Wexler, P. (1988). Symbolic economy of identity and denial of labor: Studies in high school number 1. In C. Weiss (Ed.), Class, race, & gender in American education (pp. 302-316). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
98. Witte, S. (1992), Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9, 237-308.