Socioeconomic stratification and its influences on talent development: Some interdisciplinary perspectives

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 170-180

  Ambrose, Don ^a  

^a RIDER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038891675     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001698620204600302     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ambrose, D. (1998). A model for clarification and expansion of conceptual foundations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 77-86.
2. Ambrose, D. (2000). World-view entrapment: Moral-ethical implications for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 159-186.
3. Arrow, K., Bowles, S., & Durlauf, S. (Eds.). (2000). Meritocracy and economic inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Ashenfelter, O., & Rouse, C. (2000). Schooling, intelligence, and income in America. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 89-117). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Baldwin, A. Y. (1985). Issues concerning minorities. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 223-249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. Bénabou, R. (2000). Meritocracy, redistribution, and the size of the pie. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 317-339). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Borland, J. H., Schnur, R., & Wright, L. (2000). Economically disadvantaged students in a school for the academically gifted: A postpositivist inquiry into individual and family adjustment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 13-32.
8. Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164-171.
9. Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (2000). Identifying and educating poor and under-represented gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 587-594). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
10. Bowers, C. A. (1993). Critical essays on education, modernity, and the recovery of the ecological imperative. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Breit, W., & Ransom, R. L. (1998). The academic scribblers (3rd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Feldman, M. W., Otto, S. P., & Christiansen, F. B. (2000). Genes, culture, and inequality. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 61-85). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Fischer, C. S., Hout, M., Jankowski, M. S., Lucas, S. R., Swidler, A., & Voss, K. (1996). Inequality by design: Cracking the bell curve myth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Flynn, J. R. (2000). IQ trends over time: Intelligence, race, and meritocracy. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 35-60). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Ford, D. Y. (1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Frasier, M. M. (1993). Issues, problems, and programs in nurturing the disadvantaged and culturally different talented. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 685-692). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
17. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
18. Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
19. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Friedman, M. (1975). An economist's protest: Columns in political economy (2nd ed.). Glen Ridge, NJ: Thomas Horton and Daughters.
21. Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The new industrial state. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
22. Galbraith, J. K. (1996). The good society. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
23. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: BasicBooks.
24. Gewirth, A. (1998). Self-fulfillment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Giroux, H. A. (1995). Teachers as public intellectuals. In A. C. Ornstein (Ed.), Teaching: Theory into practice (pp. 373-384). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
26. Giroux, H. A. (1997). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.
27. Giroux, H. A. (1999). Schools for sale: Public education, corporate culture, and the citizen-consumer. The Educational Forum, 63, 140-149.
28. Goodwin, B. (1994). How the leopard changed its spots: The evolution of complexity. New York: Scribners.
29. Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Nurturing the talents of exceptionally gifted individuals. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 473-490). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
30. Gross, M. U. M. (2000). Issues in the cognitive development of exceptionally and profoundly gifted individuals. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 179-192). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
31. Hauser, R. M., Warren, J. R., Huang, M. H., & Carter, W. Y. (2000). Occupational status, education, and social mobility in the meritocracy. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 179-229). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: The Free Press.
33. Hubbard, E. A. (1996). The IQ caste and gifted education. Roeper Review, 18, 258-260.
34. Jaki, S. L. (1997). Second general commentary. In B. Pullman (Ed.), The emergence of complexity in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology (pp. 423-431). Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of the Sciences.
35. Korenman, S., & Winship, C. (2000). A reanalysis of the bell curve: Intelligence, family background, and schooling. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 137-178). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities. New York: Crown.
37. Kunkel, J. C. (1997). The rich get richer and the poor starve: Is there an ethical alternative? In L. D. Kaplan & L. F. Bove (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on power and domination (pp. 159-174). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Lens, W., & Rand, P. (2000). Motivation and cognition: Their role in the development of giftedness. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotmk (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 193-202). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
39. McClaren, P., & Farahmandpur, R. (2001). Teaching against globalization and the new imperialism: Toward a revolutionary pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 136-150.
40. McMurtry, J. (1999). The cancer stage of capitalism. London: Pluto Press.
41. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and Utopia. New York: BasicBooks.
43. O'Connor, A. (2001). Poverty knowledge: Social science, social policy, and the poor in twentieth-century U.S. history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. Ogbu, J. U. (1978). Minority education and caste: The American system in cross-cultural perspective. New York: Academic Press.
45. Ogbu, J. U. (1994). Minority status, cultural frame of reference, and schooling. In D. Keller-Cohen (Ed.), Literacy: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 61-83). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
46. Passow, A. H., & Frasier, M. M. (1996). Toward improving identification of talent potential among minority and disadvantaged students. Roeper Review, 18, 198-202.
47. Peterson, J. S. (1999). Gifted - through whose cultural lens? An application of the postpositivistic mode of inquiry. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 354-383.
48. Piechowski, M. M. (2002). From William James to Maslow and Dabrowski: Excitability of character and self-actualization. In D. Ambrose, L. M. Cohen, & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Creative intelligence: Toward theoretic integration (pp. 283-322). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
49. Piirto, J. (1999). Implications of postmodern curriculum theory for the education of the talented. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 324-353.
50. Plomin, R., & Petrill, S. A. (1997). Genetics and intelligence: What's new? Intelligence, 24(1), 53-57.
51. Purcell, J. C. (1996). Preparing for fall out: A perspective on the bell curve. Roeper Review, 18, 248-252.
52. Pyryt, M. C. (1996). IQ: Easy to bash, hard to replace. Roeper Review, 18, 255-258.
53. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Rea, D. W. (2000). Optimal motivation for talent development. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 187-216.
55. Robinson, N. M. (1995). Rescuing the baby: A commentary on the bell curve. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 180-182.
56. Roemer, J. E. (2000). Equality of opportunity. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 17-32). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57. Rogers, K. D. (1996). What the bell curve does and doesn't say: Is a balanced view possible? Roeper Review, 18, 252-255.
58. Ross, W. D. (1939). Foundations of ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
59. Rudnitski, R. A. (2000). National/provincial gifted education policies: Present state, future possibilities. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 673-679). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
60. Sapolsky, R. M. (2000). Genetic hyping. The Sciences, 40(2), 12-15.
61. Sarouphim, K. M. (1999). DISCOVER: A promising alternative assessment for the identification of gifted minorities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 244-251.
62. Sen, A. (2000). Merit and justice. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 5-16). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223-243). New York: Cambridge University Press.
64. Sternberg, R. J., Callahan, C., Burns, D., Gubbins, E. J., Purcell, J. C., Reis, S. M., Renzulli, J. S., & Westberg, K. (1995). Return gift to sender: A review of the bell curve. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 177-179.
65. Thompson, L. A., & Plomin, R. (2000). Genetic tools for exploring individual differences in intelligence. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 157-164). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
66. Willis, P. E. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough, UK: Saxon House.
67. Winfrey, J. C. (1998). Social issues: The ethics and economics of taxes and public programs. New York: Oxford University Press.