Iq: Easy to bash, hard to replace

Roeper Review

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 255-258

  Pyryt, Michael C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013320615     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783199609553753     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Birch, J. W. (1984). Is any identification procedure necessary? Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 157-161.
2. Carroll, J. B. (1982). The measurement of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 29-120). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis in the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
5. Cole, N. S., & Moss, P. A. (1989). Bias in test use. In. R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd. ed.) (pp. 201-219). New York: American Council on education & Macmillan.
6. Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Talent development: The new direction in gifted education. Roeper Review, 18, 92.
7. Gagné, F. (1995). From giftedness to talent: A developmental model and its impact on the language of the field. Roeper Review, 18, 103-111.
8. Gallagher, J. J. (1994). A retrospective view: The Javits Program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 95-96.
9. Gallagher, J. J. (1996). A critique of critiques of gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 234-249.
10. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
11. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
12. Gordon, R. A. (1987). Jensen's contributions concerning test bias: A contextual view. In S. Modgil, & C. Modgil (Eds.), Arthur Jensen-Consensus and controversy (pp. 77-154). Philadelphia: Falmer.
13. Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Nurturing the talents of exceptionally gifted individuals. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 473-490). Oxford: Pergamon.
14. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Hambleton, R. K. (1989). Principles and selected applications of item response theory. In. R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd. ed.) (pp. 147-200). New York: American Council on Education & Macmillan.
16. Hermstein, R. J., & Murray, C. A. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and the class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
17. Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1-123.
18. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
19. Kaufman, A. S. & Harrison, P. L. (1986). Intelligence tests and gifted assessment: What are the positives? Roeper Review, 8, 154-159.
20. Lord, F. A. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). An opportunity for empiricism [Review of Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice]. Contemporary Psychology, 40, 935-938.
22. MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484-495.
23. Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U. S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24. McNemar, Q. (1964). Lost: Our intelligence? Why? American Psychologist, 19, 871-882.
25. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd. ed.) (pp. 13-103). New York: American Council on Education & Macmillan.
26. Osterlind, S. (1987). Psychometric validity for test bias in the work of Arthur Jensen. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Arthur Jensen -Consensus and controversy (pp. 191-198). Philadelphia: Falmer.
27. Renzulli, J. S. (Ed.). (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
28. Robinson, N. M. (1995). Rescuing the baby: A commentary on The Bell Curve. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 180-182.
29. Robinson N. M., & Chamrad, D. L. (1986). Appropriate uses of intelligence tests with gifted children. Roeper Review, 8, 160-163.
30. Ross, P. O. (1994). Introduction to descriptions of Javits grant projects. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 64.
31. Scarr, S., & Carter-Saltzman, L. (1982). Genetics and intelligence. In R. J. Steinberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 792-896). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Shepard, L. A. (1987). The case for bias in tests of achievement and scholastic aptitude. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Arthur Jensen-Consensus and controversy (pp. 177-190). Philadelphia: Falmer
33. Snyderman, M., & Roth, S. (1988). The IQ controversy, the media and public policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
34. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Identifying the gifted through IQ: Why a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Roeper Review, 8, 143-147.
36. Sternberg, R. J. (1996). The school bell and The Bell Curve: Why they don't mix. National Association for Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 80 (577), 46-56.
37. Sternberg, R. J., Callahan, C., Burns, D., Gubbins, E. J., Purcell, J., Reis, S. M., Renzulli, J. S., & Westberg, K. (1995). Return gift to sender: A review of The Bell Curve. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 177-179.
38. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Sternberg, R. J., Ferrari, M., Clinkenbeard, P., & Grigorenko, E. L. (in press). Identification, instruction, and assessment of gifted children: A construct validation of a triarchic model. Gifted Child Quarterly
40. Treffinger, D. J., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1996) Talent recognition and development: Successor to gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 181-193.
41. Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1995). The development of talent through curriculum. Roeper Review, 18, 98-102.