Does Lexical Information Influence the Perceptual Restoration of Phonemes?

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 125, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 28-51

  Samuel, Arthur G ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030527993     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.28     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bertelson, P., & Radeau, M. (1976). Ventriloquism, sensory interaction and response bias: Remarks on the paper by Choe, Welch, Gilford, and Juola. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 531-535.
2. Burton, M. W., Baum, S. R., & Blumstein, S. E. (1989). Lexical effects on the phonetic categorization of speech: The role of acoustic structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 567-575.
3. Connine, C. M., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1987). Interactive use of lexical information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 291-299.
4. Cutler, A., Butterfield, S., & Williams, J. N. (1987). The perceptual integrity of syllabic onsets. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 406-418.
5. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1987). Phoneme identification and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 141-177.
6. Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 113-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. DeWitt, L. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1990). The role of knowledge-based expectations in music perception: Evidence from musical restoration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 123-144.
8. Eimas, P. D., Marcovitz Hornstein, S., & Payton, P. (1990). Attention and the role of dual codes in phoneme monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 160-180.
9. Elman, J. L., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 143-165.
10. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Foss, D. J., & Blank, M. A. (1980). Identifying the speech codes. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 1-31.
12. Fox, R. A. (1984). Effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 526-540.
13. Frauenfelder, U. H., Segui, J., & Dijkstra, T. (1990). Lexical effects in phonemic processing: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 77-91.
14. Ganong, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 110-125.
15. Jakimik, J. (1980). The interaction of sound and knowledge in word recognition from fluent speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
16. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
17. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
18. Massaro, D. W. (1989). Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 398-421.
19. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1991). Integration versus interactive activation: The joint influence of stimulus and context in perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 558-614.
20. Massaro, D. W., & Oden, G. C. (1995). Independence of lexical context and phonological information in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1053-1064.
21. McClelland, J. L. (1991). Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1-44.
22. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
23. McQueen, J. M. (1991). The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 433-443.
24. Miller, J. L., & Dexter, E. R. (1988). Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 369-378.
25. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (1995). Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1209-1228.
26. Pitt, M. A. (1995). The locus of the lexical shift in phoneme identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1037-1052.
27. Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1990). Attentional allocation during speech perception: How fine is the focus? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 611-632.
28. Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1993). An empirical and metaanalytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 699-725.
29. Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1995). Lexical and sublexical feedback in auditory word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 149-188.
30. Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., & Verwoerd, M. (1989). A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 378-387.
31. Rubin, P., Turvey, M. T., & van Gelder, P. (1976). Initial phonemes are detected faster in spoken words than in spoken nonwords. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 394-398.
32. Samuel, A. G. (1981a). Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 474-494.
33. Samuel, A. G. (1981b). The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1124-1131.
34. Samuel, A. G. (1986). The role of the lexicon in speech perception. In E. C. Schwab & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), Pattern recognition by humans and machines: Speech perception (Vol. 1, pp. 89-112). New York: Academic Press.
35. Samuel, A. G. (1987). The effect of lexical uniqueness on phonemic restoration. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 36-56.
36. Samuel, A. G. (1991). A further examination of attentional effects in the phonemic restoration illusion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 679-699.
37. Samuel, A. G., & Ressler, W. H. (1986). Attention within auditory word perception: Insights from the phonemic restoration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 70-79.
38. Segui, J., & Frauenfelder, U. (1986). The effect of lexical constraints upon speech perception. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performance (pp. 795-808). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
39. Tanenhaus, M. K., & Lucas, M. M. (1987). Context effects in lexical processing. Cognition, 25, 213-234.
40. Trout, J. D., & Poser, W. J. (1990). Auditory and visual influences on phonemic restoration. Language and Speech, 33, 121-135.
41. Tyler, L. K. (1990). The relationship between sentential context and sensory input: Comments on Connine's and Samuel's chapters. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 315-323). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
42. Warren, R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 167, 392-393.