Genes, morphology and agreement: Congruence in Australian anthracine bee flies (Diptera: Bombyliidae: Anthracinae)

Invertebrate Systematics

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 161-184

  Lambkin, Christine L ^a,b   Yeates, David K ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Phylogenetic relationships; Simultaneous analysis

Indexed keywords

FLY; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY;

AUSTRALIA;

ANTHRACINAE; ANTHRACINI; APOIDEA; BOMBYLIIDAE; DIPTERA; EXOPROSOPINI; INSECTA; LIGYRA; VILLINI;

EID: 0037985336     PISSN: 14455226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/IS02039     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Baker, R. H., and DeSalle, R. (1997). Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Systematic Biology 46, 654-673.
2. Baker, R. H., Yu, X., and DeSalle, R. (1998). Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9, 427-436.
3. Barrett, M., Donoghue, M. J., and Sober, E. (1991). Against consensus. Systematic Zoology 40, 486-493.
4. Bezzi, M. (1924). 'The Bombyliidae of the Ethiopian Region.' (British Museum, Natural History: London, UK.)
5. Bowden, J. (1971). Notes on the Genus Ligyra Newman (Diptera: Bombyliidae) with descriptions of three new species from the New Guinea Subregion. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 10, 5-12.
6. Bowden, J. (1980). Family Bombyliidae. In 'Catalogue of the Diptera of the Afrotropical Region'. (Ed. R. Crosskey.) pp. 381-430. (British Museum, Natural History: London, UK.)
7. Bremer, K. (1988). The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42, 795-803.
8. Bremer, K. (1994). Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295-304.
9. Brower, A. V. Z., and DeSalle, R. (1994). Practical and theoretical considerations for choice of a DNA sequence region in insect molecular systematics, with a short review of published studies using nuclear gene regions. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87, 702-716.
10. Bull, J. J., Huelsenbeck, J. P., Cunningham, C. W., Swofford, D. L., and Waddell, P. J. (1993). Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42, 384-397.
11. Cannatella, D. C., Hillis, D. M., Chippindale, P. T., Weigt, L., Rand, A. S., and Ryan, M. J. (1998). Phylogeny of frogs of the Physalaemus pustulosus species group, with an examination of data incongruence. Systematic Biology 47, 311-335.
12. Chippindale, P. T., and Wiens, J. J. (1994). Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 43, 278-287.
13. Clary, D. O., and Wolstenholme, D. R. (1985). The mitochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: nucleotide sequence, gene organisation, and genetic code. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22, 252-271.
14. Cunningham, C. W. (1997a). Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14, 733-740.
15. Cunningham, C. W. (1997b). Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Systematic Biology 46, 464-478.
16. de Queiroz, A. (1993). For consensus (sometimes). Systematic Biology 42, 368-372.
17. de Queiroz, A., Donoghue, M. J., and Kim, J. (1995). Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26, 657-681.
18. Eernisse, D. J., and Kluge, A. G. (1993). Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules and morphology. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10, 1170-1195.
19. Evenhuis, N. L. (1981). Studies in Pacific Bombyliidae (Diptera) VI. Description of a new anthracine genus from the western Pacific, with notes on some of Matsumura's Anthrax types. Pacific Insects 23, 189-200.
20. Evenhuis, N. L., and Greathead, D. J. (1999). 'World Catalog of Bee Flies (Diptera: Bombyliidae).' (Backhuys: Leiden, The Netherlands.)
21. Farris, J. (1989). The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5, 417-419.
22. Farris, J. S. (1990). Phenetics in camouflage. Cladistics 6, 91-100.
23. Farris, J. S., Kallersjö, M., Kluge, A. G., and Bult, C. (1995a). Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Systematic Biology 44, 570-572.
24. Farris, J. S., Kallersjö, M., Kluge, A. G., and Bult, C. (1995b). Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10, 315-319.
25. Gatesy, J., O'Grady, P., and Baker, R. H. (1999). Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level artiodactyl taxa. Cladistics 15, 271-313.
26. Gibson, T. J., Higgins, D. G., and Thompson, J. D. (1996). 'ClustalW.' (European Molecular Biology Laboratory: Heidelberg, Germany.)
27. Hesse, A. (1956). A revision of the Bombyliidae (Diptera) of Southern Africa. [Part III and Appendix to Part I.] Annals of the South African Museum 35, 465-972.
28. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Bull, J. J., and Cunningham, C. W. (1996). Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11, 152-158.
29. Hull, F. (1973). Bee flies of the world. The genera of the family Bombyliidae. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 286, 1-687.
30. Kallersjö, M., Farris, J. S., Kluge, A. G., and Bult, C. (1992). Skewness and permutation. Cladistics 8, 275-287.
31. Kallersjö, M., Farris, J. S., and Albert, V. A. (1999). Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15, 91-93.
32. Kluge, A. (1989). A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38, 7-25.
33. Kluge, A., and Farris, J. (1969). Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology 18, 1-32.
34. Lanyon, S. (1993). Phylogenetic frameworks: towards a firmer foundation for the comparative approach. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 49, 45-61.
35. Larson, A., and Dimmick, W. W. (1993). Phylogenetic relationships of the salamander families: an analysis of congruence among morphological and molecular characters. Herpetological Monographs 7, 77-93.
36. Mason-Gamer, R. J., and Kellogg, E. A. (1996). Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Systematic Biology 45, 524-545.
37. Meier, R. (1994). On the inappropriateness of presence/absence recoding for non-additive multistate characters in computerised cladistic analysis. Zoologische Anzeiger 232, 201-212.
38. Mickevich, M. (1978). Taxonomic congruence. Systematic Zoology 27, 143-158.
39. Mickevich, M., and Farris, J. (1981). The implications of congruence in Menidia. Systematic Zoology 30, 351-370.
40. Miyamoto, M. M. (1981). Congruence among character sets in phylogenetic studies of the frog genus Leptodactylus. Systematic Zoology 30, 281-290.
41. Miyamoto, M. (1985). Consensus cladograms and general classifications. Cladistics 1, 186-189.
42. Miyamoto, M. M., and Fitch, W. M. (1995). Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Systematic Biology 44, 64-76.
43. Myers, E., and Kececioglu, J. (1992). 'SeqEd.' (Applied Biosystems Incorporated: Foster City, California.)
44. Nelson, G. (1979). Cladistic analysis and synthesis: principles and definitions with a historical note on Adanson's Famille des Plantes 1763-1764. Systematic Zoology 28, 1-21.
45. Nixon, K. C., and Carpenter, J. M. (1996). On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12, 221-241.
46. O'Grady, P. M., Clark, J. B., and Kidwell, M. G. (1998). Phylogeny of the Drosophila saltans species group based on combined analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15, 656-664.
47. Omland, K. E. (1994). Character congruence between a molecular and morphological phylogeny for dabbling ducks (Anas). Systematic Biology 43, 369-386.
48. Paramonov, S. (1967). A review of the Australian species of the genus Ligyra Newman. (Hyperalonia olim) (Bombyliidae, Diptera). Australian Journal of Zoology 15, 123-144.
49. Remsen, J., and DeSalle, R. (1998). Character congruence of multiple data partitions and the origin of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9, 225-235.
50. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A. R. (1977). DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 74, 5463-5467.
51. Schuh, T., and Farris, J. S. (1981). Methods of investigating taxonomic congruence and their application the Leptopodomorpha. Systematic Zoology 30, 331-350.
52. Shaffer, H. B., Clark, J. M., and Kraus, F. (1991). When molecules and morphology clash: a phylogenetic analysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Systematic Zoology 40, 284-303.
53. Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H., and Flook, P. (1994). Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87, 651-701.
54. Sorenson, M. D. (1999). 'TreeRot. Version 2.' (Boston University: Boston, MA, USA.)
55. Swofford, D. (1991). When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? In 'Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences'. (Eds M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft.) pp. 295-333. (Oxford University Press: New York, USA.)
56. Swofford, D. (2002). 'PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4.0b10.' (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA.)
57. Swofford, D., and Begle, D. (1993). 'PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Version 3.1.1 User's Manual.' (Illinois Natural History Survey: Champaign, IL, USA.)
58. Theodor, O. (1983). 'The Genitalia of Bombyliidae (Diptera).' (Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities: Jerusalem, Israel.)
59. Wheeler, W. C., Cartwright, P., and Hayashi, C. Y. (1993). Arthropod phylogeny: a combined approach. Cladistics 9, 1-39.
60. White, A. (1917). The Diptera-Brachycera of Tasmania. Part III. Families Asilidae, Bombyliidae, Empididae, Dolichopodidae and Phoridae. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 1916, 148-266.
61. Wiens, J. J. (1998). Combining data sets with different phylogenetic histories. Systematic Biology 47, 568-581.
62. Yeates, D. (1994). Cladistics and classification of the Bombyliidae (Diptera: Asiloidea). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 219, 1-191.
63. Yeates, D. K., and Lambkin, C. L. (1998). Cryptic species diversity and character congruence: review of the tribe Anthracini (Diptera: Bombyliidae) in Australia. Invertebrate Taxonomy 12, 977-1078.