Polarisation of prokaryotic chromosomes

Current Opinion in Microbiology

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 101-108

  Lobry, Jean R ^a   Louarn, Jean Michel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b UMR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENINE; BACTERIOPHAGE DNA; CARRIER PROTEIN; CYTOSINE; GUANINE; THYMINE;

CHROMOSOME; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE SEQUENCE; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; OPERON; POLARIZATION; PROKARYOTE; REVIEW;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 0037676132     PISSN: 13695274     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1369-5274(03)00024-9     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Cordes S, Epstein HT, Marmur J: Some properties of the deoxyribonucleic acid of phage alpha. Nature 1961, 191:1097-1098.
2. Hradecna Z, Szybalski W: Fractionation of the complementary strands of coliphage λ DNA based on the asymmetric distribution of the poly I,G-binding sites. Virology 1967, 32:633-643.
3. Rudner R, Karkas JD, Chargaff E: Separation of microbial deoxyribonucleic acids into complementary strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1969, 63:152-159.
4. Roger M: Evidence for conversion of heteroduplex transforming DNAs to homoduplexes by recipient pneumococcal cells (DNA strand resolution-bacterial transformation-genetic recombination). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1972, 69:466-470.
5. Lobry JR, Sueoka N: Asymmetric directional mutation pressures in bacteria. Genome Biology 2002, 3:RESEARCH0058. This paper presents a recent analysis of the G/C and A/T skews in 43 sequenced bacterial chromosomes. It shows that skews are highly correlated with weakly selected positions, and that they are not correlated with the overall G+C content.
6. McLean MJ, Wolfe KH, Devine KM: Base composition skews, replication orientation, and gene orientation in 12 prokaryote genomes. J Mol Evol 1998, 47:691-696.
7. Lobry JR: Asymmetric substitution patterns in the two DNA strands of bacteria. Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13:660-665.
8. Blattner FR, Plunkett G III, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, Collado-Vides J, Glasner JD, Rode CK, Mayhew GF et al.: The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 1997, 277:1453-1474.
9. Picardeau M, Lobry JR, Hinnebusch BJ: Physical mapping of an origin of bidirectional replication at the center of the Borrelia burgdoferi linear chromosome. Mol Microbiol 1999, 32:437-445.
10. Myllykallio H, Lopez P, Lopez-garcia P, Heilig R, Saurin W, Zivanovic Y, Philippe H, Forterre P: Bacterial mode of replication with eukaryotic-like machinery in a hyperthermophilic archaeon. Science 2000, 288:2212-2215.
11. Zawilak A, Cebrat S, Mackiewicz P, Krol-Hulewicz A, Jakimowicz D, Messer W, Gosciniak G, Zakrewska-Czerwinska J: Identification of a putative chromosomal replication origin from Helicobacter pylori and its interaction with the initiator protein DnaA. Nucleic Acids Res 2001, 29:2251-2259.
12. Sueoka N: Intrastrand parity rules of DNA base composition and usage biases of synonymous codons. J Mol Evol 1995, 40:318-325. [published erratum appears in J Mol Evol 1995, 42:323.]
13. Lobry JR: Properties of a general model of DNA evolution under no-strand-bias conditions. J Mot Evot 1995, 40:326-330. [Published erratum appears in J Mol Evol 1995, 41:680.]
14. Lobry JR, Lobry C: Evolution of DNA base composition under no-strand-bias conditions when the substitution rates are not constant. Mot Biot Evot 1999, 16:719-723.
15. Mushegian AR, Koonin EV: Gene order is not conserved in bacterial evolution. Trends Genet 1996, 12:289-290.
16. Itho H, Takemoto K, Mori H, Gojobori T: Evolutionary instability of operon structures disclosed by sequence comparisons of complete microbial genomes. Mot Biot Evot 1999, 16:332-346.
17. Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Kondrashov AS, Koonin EV: Genome alignment, evolution of prokaryotic genome organization, and prediction of gene function using genomic context. Genome Res 2001, 11:356-372. Because functionally related genes are often clustered in operons, one would expect such structures to be conserved on an evolutionary scale. This is clearly not the case, as demonstrated by the systematic search performed by the authors of this paper on 25 complete prokaryotic genomes. This is an up-to-date demonstration of this surprising negative result, with many references to previous and consistent findings.
18. Gibbs AJ, McIntyre GA: The diagram, a method for comparing sequences. Its use with amino-acid and nucleotide sequences. Eur J Bioch 1970, 16:1-13.
19. Read TD, Brunham RC, Shen C, Gill SR, Heidelberg JF, White O, Hickey EK, Peterson J, Utterback T, Berry K et al.: Genome sequence of Chlamydia trachomatis MoPn and Chlamydia pneumoniae AR39. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:1397-1406.
20. Tillier ER, Collins RA: Genome rearrangement by replication-directed translocation. Nat Genet 2000, 26:195-197.
21. Eisen JA, Heidelberg JF, White O, Salzberg SL: Evidence for symmetric chromosomal inversions around the replication origin in bacteria. Genome Biology 2000, 1: RESEARCH0011.1-RESEARCH0011.9.
22. Suyama M, Bork P: Evolution of prokaryotic gene order: genome rearrangements in closely related species. Trends Genet 2001, 17:10-13. In Figure 1, the dot plots are ordered according to increasing divergence at the amino acid level. The progressive X-fication from Figure la-g is striking. The last two panels, corresponding to Mycoplasma and Chlamydia, are outliers: their rate of genome rearrangement is abnormally low (neglecting the effect due to substitution rate acceleration in these lineages). The authors of this paper suggest that this could be a consequence of the deficiency in RecG helicase in these species.
23. Moran NA, Mira A: The process of genome shrinkage in the obligate symbiont Buchnera aphidicola. Genome Biology 2001, 2:RESEARCH0054.1-RESEARCH0054.12. Buchnera aphidicola is an obligate endosymbiont of aphids. Compared with E. coli, a closely related free-living bacteria, its genome size has been drastically reduced from 4.6 Mb to 0.6 Mb. Despite this sevenfold difference in genome size, an X-shaped dot plot is visible in Figure 6 of this paper.
24. Takami H, Nakasone K, Takaki Y, Maeno G, Sasaki R, Masui N, Fuji F, Hirama C, Nakamura Y, Ogasawara N et al.: Complete genome sequence of the alkaliphilic bacterium Bacillus halodurans and genomic sequence comparison with Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:4317-4331.
25. Zivanovic Y, Lopez P, Philippe H, Forterre P: Pyrococcus genome comparison evidences chromosome shuffling-driven evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30:1902-1910. There are also X-shaped dot plots in archae (Figure 1), confirming their bacteria-like mode of chromosome replication.
26. Mackiewicz P, Mackiewicz D, Kowalczuk M, Cebrat S: Flip-flop around the origin and terminus of replication in prokaryotic genomes. Genome Biology 2001, 2: INTERACTIONS1004.1-INTERACTIONS1004.4. This is a very interesting discussion about the potential underlying reasons of chromosome polarisation conservation. The impact of various chromosomal inversion scenarios on chromosome polarisation is well illustrated by Figure 3. Only a symmetrical inversion encompassing the origin or terminus maintains both chromosome polarisation and replichore length (scenario 3a). In complement to the authors' arguments for their third point, note that a chromosome-length polymorphism study for Escherichia coli is in favor of a selective force to maintain replichores of similar size [67].
27. Brewer BJ: When polymerases collide: replication and the transcriptional organization of the E. coli chromosome. Cell 1988, 53:679-686.
28. French S: Consequences of replication fork movement through transcription units in vivo. Science 1992, 258:1362-1365.
29. Rebollo JE, François V, Louarn JM: Detection and possible role of two large nondivisible zones on the Escherichia coli chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988, 85:9391-9395.
30. Tillier ERM, Collins RA: The contributions of replication orientation, gene direction, and signal sequences to base-composition asymmetries in bacterial genomes. J Mol Evol 2000, 50:249-257.
31. Salzberg SL, Salzberg AJ, Kerlavage AR, Tomb JF: Skewed oligomers and origins of replication. Gene 1998, 217:57-67.
32. Kuzminov A: Recombinational repair of DNA damage in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1999, 63:751-813.
33. Gruss A, Michel B: The replication-recombination connection: insights from genomics. Curr Opin Microbiol 2001, 4:595-601. This review updates the work by Kuzminov (1999) [32] and shows, in particular, that the skew of Chi sites may vary with the organism.
34. El Karoui M, Biaudet V, Schbath S, Gruss A: Characteristics of Chi distribution on different bacterial genomes. Res Microbiol 1999, 150:579-587.
35. Colbert T, Taylor AF, Smith GR: Genomics, Chi sites and codons: "islands of preferred DNA pairings" are oceans of ORFs. Trends Genet 1998, 14:485-488.
36. Capiaux H, Cornet F, Corre J, Guijo M, Perals K, Rebollo JE, Louarn JM: Polarization of the Escherichia coli chromosome: a view from the terminus. Biochimie 2001, 83:161-170.
37. Cornet F, Louarn J, Patte J, Louarn JM: Restriction of the activity of the recombination site dif to a small zone of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Genes Dev 1996, 10:1152-1161.
38. Kuempel P, Hogaard A, Nielsen M, Nagappan O, Tecklenburg M: Use of a transposon (Tndif) to obtain suppressing and nonsuppressing insertions of the dif resolvase site of Escherichia coli. Genes Dev 1996, 10:1162-1171.
39. Perals K, Cornet F, Merlet Y, Delon I, Louarn JM: Functional polarization of the Escherichia coli chromosome terminus: the dif site acts in chromosome dimer resolution only when located between long stretches of opposite polarity. Mol Microbiol 2000, 36:33-43.
40. Donachie WD: FtsK: Maxwell's demon? Mol Cell 2002, 9:206-207. This is a recent review on the multiple activities of the FtsK protein as a keystone of the replication-division coupling.
41. Aussel L, Barre FX, Aroyo M, Stasiak A, Stasiak AZ, Sherratt D: FtsK is a DNA motor protein that activates chromosome dimer resolution by switching the catalytic state of the XerC and XerD recombinases. Cell 2002, 108:195-205. See annotation Corre and Louarn (2002) [43].
42. Capiaux H, Lesterlin C, Perals K, Louarn JM, Cornet F: Functional replacement of the E. coli dif recombination site reveals a dual role for the FtsK protein in chromosome segregation. EMBO Reports 2002, 3:523-526. See annotation Corre and Louarn (2002) [43].
43. Corre J, Louarn JM: Evidence from terminal recombination gradients that FtsK uses replichore polarity to control terminus positioning at division: J Bacteriol 2002, 184:3801-3807. Papers [41-43] present the available evidence to show that FtsK is a DNA translocase [41"], which guides the sites involved in dimer resolution to the septum [42], and does this by mobilizing terminus DNA in a polarity-dependent manner [43].
44. Niki H, Yamaichi Y, Hiraga S: Dynamic organization of chromosomal DNA in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev 2000, 14:212-223.
45. Uno R, Nakayama Y, Arakawa K, Tomita M: The orientation bias of Chi sequences is a general tendency of G-rich oligomers. Gene 2000, 259:207-215.
46. Coskun-Ari FF, Hill TM: Sequence-specific interactions in the Tus-Ter complex and the effect of base pair substitutions on arrest of DNA replication in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 1997, 272:26448-26456.
47. Guijo MI, Patte J, del Mar Campos M, Louarn JM, Rebollo JE: Localized remodeling of the Escherichia coli chromosome: the patchwork of segments refractory and tolerant to inversion near the replication terminus. Genetics 2001, 157:1413-1423.
48. Bachellier S, Clement JM, Hofnung M: Short palindromic repetitive DNA elements in enterobacteria: a survey. Res Microbiol 1999, 150:627-639.
49. Kowalczuk M, Mackiewicz P, Mackiewicz D, Nowicka A, Dudkiewicz M, Dudek MR, Cebrat S: DNA asymmetry and the replicational mutational pressure. J Appl Genet 2001, 42:553-577. An up-to-date review about DNA asymmetries and potential underlying mechanisms, the best current entry to previous literature on the subject.
50. Taddei F, Radman M, Maynard-Smith J, Toupance B, Gouyon PH, Godelle B: Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution. Nature 1997, 387:700-702.
51. Fijatkowska IJ, Jonczyk P, Tkaczyk MM, Bialoskorska M, Schaaper RM: Unequal fidelity of leading strand and lagging strand DNA replication on the Escherichia coli chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:10020-10025.
52. Gawel D, Maliszewska-Tkaczyk M, Jonczyk P, Schaaper RM, Fijalkowska IJ: Asymmetry of frameshift mutagenesis during leading and lagging-strand replication in Escherichia coli. Mutat Res 2002, 501:129-136. Papers [51,52] report measurements of mutation frequencies within the lac operon inserted in either orientations at the attposition on the chromosome. The authors have taken advantage of well-identified lacZ mutants to determine frequencies and strand preferences of various mutational events. They clearly establish the higher mutability of the leading strand during normal replication (the use of mutL strains, eliminating post replicative repair of mismatches, facilitated the detection of effects due to replication errors).
53. Frank AC, Lobry JR: Asymmetric substitution patterns: a review of possible underlying mutational or selective mechanisms. Gene 1999, 238:65-77.
54. Bentley SD, Chater KF, Cerdeño-Tárraga AM, Challis GL, Thomson NR, James KD, Harris DE, Quail MA, Kieser H, Harper D et al.: Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Nature 2002, 417:141-147. This paper presents the first counter-example to the universality of compositional biases orientations, implying the rejection of the cytosine deamination theory as a universal mechanism at the origin of asymmetric directional pressure in bacteria.
55. Corre J, Patte J, Louarn JM: Prophage lambda induces terminal recombination in Escherichia coli by inhibiting chromosome dimer resolution: an orientation-dependent cis-effect lending support to bipolarization of the terminus. Genetics 2000, 154:39-48.
56. Horiuchi T, Fujimura Y, Nishitani H, Kobayashi T, Hidaka M: The DNA replication fork blocked at the Ter site may be an entrance for the RecBCD enzyme into duplex DNA. J Bacteriol 1994, 176:4656-4663.
57. Peters JE, Craig NL: Tn7 transposes proximal to DNA doublestrand breaks and into regions where chromosomal DNA replication terminates. Mol Cell 2000, 6:573-582.
58. Huber KE, Waldor MK: Filamentous phage integration requires the host recombinases XerC and XerD. Nature 2002, 417:656-659. Papers [55-57,58] present all recombination events disclosed in the terminus, in addition to dimer resolution. [55] shows that the dif region undergoes recombinogenic lesions at very high frequency when chromosome dimer resolution is inhibited, and when RecD is inactivated. [56] provided the first indication that fork arrest at Ter sites is recombinogenic. [57] shows an example of preferred transposition in the terminus (generalised Tn7 transposition). [58] describes how the dif site of Vibrio cholerae chromosome 1 has been used for integration of a bacteriophage carrying important virulence determinants.
59. Myers RS, Kuzminov A, Stahl FW: The recombination hot spot chi activates RecBCD recombination by converting Escherichia coli to a recD mutant phenocopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:6244-6248.
60. Koppen A, Krobitsch S, Thoms B, Wackernagel W: Interaction with the recombination hot spot chi in vivo converts the RecBCD enzyme of Escherichia coli into a chi-independent recombinase by inactivation of the RecD subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995, 92:6249-6253.
61. Kowalczuk M: Mutational and selection pressures in the Borrelia burgdorferi genome [PhD Thesis]. Wroclaw: Wroclaw University; 2002. This polish PhD dissertation (core text in English) is available online in Smorfland's web site (http://smorfland.microb.uni.wroc, pl/1. It describes a valuable study of an intriguing situation: Borrelia genome is exceptional in that the asymmetric mutation pressure is so high that the amino acid content of proteins is greatly affected. This is because the genome has undergone the most extreme, to our current knowledge, asymmetric mutation pressure.
62. Takami H, Takaki Y, Uchiyama I: Genome sequence of Oceanobacillus iheyensis isolated from the Iheya Ridge and its unexpected adaptive capabilities to extreme environments. Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30:3927-3935.
63. Paulsen IT, Seshadri R, Nelson KE, Eisen JA, Heidelberg JF, Read TD, Dodson RJ, Umayam L, Brinkac LM, Beanan MJ et al.: The Brucella suis genome reveals fundamental similarities between animal and plant pathogens and symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:13148-13153.
64. Goodner B, Hinkle G, Gattung S, Miller N, Blanchard M, Qurollo B, Goldman BS, Cao Y, Askenazi M, Halling C et al.: Genome sequence of the plant pathogen and biotechnology agent Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Science 2001, 294:2323-2328.
65. Wood DW, Setubal JC, Kaul R, Monks DE, Kitajima JP, Okura VK, Zhou Y, Chen L, Wood GE, Almeida NF Jr et al.: The genome of the natural genetic engineer Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Science 2001, 294:2317-2323.
66. Glaser P, Rusniok C, Buchrieser C, Chevalier F, Frangeul L, Msadek T, Zouine M, Couve E, Lalioui L, Poyart C et al.: Genome sequence of Streptococcus agalactiae, a pathogen causing invasive neonatal disease. Mol Microbiol 2002, 45:1499-1513.
67. Bergthorsson U, Ochman H: Distribution of chromosome length variation in natural isolates of Escherichia coli. Mol Biol Evol 1998, 15:6-16.
68. Frank AC, Lobry JR: Oriloc: prediction of replication boundaries in unannotated bacterial chromosomes. Bioinformatics 2000, 16:560-561.