Contributions of Source and Inhibitory Mechanisms to Age-Related Retroactive Interference in Verbal Working Memory

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 132, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 93-112

  Hedden, Trey ^b   Park, Denise C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; RECALL; RECOGNITION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MENTAL RECALL; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0037629946     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.93     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Albert, M. S., Moss, M. B., Tanzi, R., & Jones, K. (2001). Preclinical prediction of AD using neuropsychological tests. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 631-639.
2. Anderson, M. C., & Green, C. (2001). Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control. Nature, 410, 366-369.
3. Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In E. L. Bjork (Ed.), Memory (pp. 237-313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Bayen, U. J. (1999). Aging and source monitoring of characters in literary texts. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 6, 187-200.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). Psyscope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
7. Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., Shisler, R. J., & Engle, R. W. (1999). The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation. Memory and Cognition, 27, 1042-1050.
8. Curran, T., & Hintzman, D. L. (1997). Consequences and causes of correlations in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 496-504.
9. Dodson, C. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181-194.
10. Glisky, E. L., Rubin, S. R., & Davidson, P. S. R. (2001). Source memory in older adults: An encoding or retrieval problem? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1131-1146.
11. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
12. Gruppuso, V., Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1997). The process-dissociation procedure and similarity: Defining and estimating recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 259-278.
13. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193-225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Hay, J. F., & Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Separating habit and recollection in young and older adults: Effects of elaborative processing and distinctiveness. Psychology and Aging, 14, 122-134.
15. Hedden, T., & Park, D. C. (2001). Aging and interference in verbal working memory. Psychology and Aging, 16, 666-681.
16. Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2001). False recognition occurs more frequently during source identification than during old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 375-383.
17. Humphreys, M. S. (1976). Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 4, 221-232.
18. Humphreys, M. S., & Tehan, G. (1999). Cues and codes in working memory tasks. In C. Izawa (Ed.), On human memory: Evolution, progress, and reflections on the 30th anniversary of the Atkinson-Shiffrin model (pp. 127-149). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
20. Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 3-26.
21. Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 3-22.
22. Jacoby, L. L., Begg, I. M., & Toth, J. P. (1997). In defense of functional independence: Violations of assumptions underlying the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 484-495.
23. Jacoby, L. L., Debner, J. A., & Hay, J. F. (2001). Proactive interference, accessibility bias, and process dissociations: Valid subjective reports of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 686-700.
24. Jacoby, L. L., & Shrout, P. E. (1997). Toward a psychometric analysis of violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 505-510.
25. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8, 283-293.
26. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
27. Jonides, J., Marshuetz, C., Smith, E. E., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Koeppe, R. A., & Hartley, A. (2000). Age differences in behavior and PET activation reveal differences in interference resolution in verbal working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 188-196.
28. Killiany, R. J., Gomez-Isla, T., Moss, M., Kikinis, R., Sandor, T., Jolesz, F., et al. (2000). Use of structural magnetic resonance imaging to predict who will get Alzheimer's Disease. Annals of Neurology, 47, 430-439.
29. Lindsay, D. S. (1994). Memory source monitoring and eyewitness testimony. In D. F. Ross (Ed.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 27-55). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition, 17, 349-358.
31. Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1991). Recognition memory and source monitoring. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 203-205.
32. Lustig, C., Hasher, L., & Tonev, S. T. (2001). Inhibitory control over the present and the past. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 107-122.
33. Lustig, C., May, C. P., & Hasher, L. (2001). Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 199-207.
34. Mather, M., Johnson, M. K., De Leonardis, D. M. (1999). Stereotype reliance in source monitoring: Age differences and neuropsychological test correlates. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 437-458.
35. May, C. P., Hasher, L., & Kane, M. J. (1999). The role of interference in memory span. Memory & Cognition, 27, 759-767.
36. Mitchell, K. J., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Mather, M., & D'Esposito, M. (2000). Aging and reflective processes of working memory: Binding and test load deficits. Psychology and Aging, 15, 527-541.
37. Mulligan, N. W., & Hirshman, E. (1997). Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 280-304.
38. Multhaup, K. S. (1995). Aging, source, and decision criteria: When false fame errors do and do not occur. Psychology and Aging, 10, 492-497.
39. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310.
40. Park, D. C. (2000). The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function. In D. C. Park & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 3-21). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
41. Park, D. C., & Hedden, T. (2001). Working memory and aging. In M. Naveh-Benjamin, M. Moscovitch, & H. L. Roediger III (Eds.), Perspectives on human memory and cognitive aging: Essays in honour of Fergus Craik (pp. 148-167). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
42. Park, D. C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N. S., Smith, A. D., & Smith, P. S. (2002) Models of visuospatial and verbal ability across the adult lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 17, 299-320.
43. Park, D. C., Nisbett, R. N., & Hedden, T. (1999). Aging, culture, and cognition. Journal of Gerontology, 54B, P75-P84.
44. Park, D. C., & Skurnik, I. (in press). Aging, cognition, and patient errors in following medical instructions. In M. S. Bogner (Ed.), Human error in health care: A handbook of issues and indications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Park, D. C., Smith, A. D., Lautenschlager, G., Earles, J. L., Frieske, D., Zwahr, M., & Gaines, C. L. (1996). Mediators of long-term memory performance across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 11, 621-637.
46. Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 418-436.
47. Rybash, J. M., & Hrubi-Bopp, K. L. (2000). Source monitoring and false recollection: A life span developmental perspective. Experimental Aging Research, 26, 75-87.
48. Rypma, B., & D'Esposito, M. (2000). Isolating the neural mechanisms of age-related changes in human working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 509-515.
49. Rypma, B., & D'Esposito, M. (2001). Age-related changes in brain-behavior relationships: Evidence from event-related functional MRI studies. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 235-256.
50. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403-428.
51. Salthouse, T. A., & Babcock, R. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 763-776.
52. Salthouse, T. A., & Hedden, T. (2002). Interpreting reaction time measures in between-group comparisons. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 854-868.
53. Schacter, D. L., Kaszniak, A. W., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Valdiserri, M. (1991). The relation between source memory and aging. Psychology and Aging, 6, 559-568.
54. Shipley, W. C. (1986). Shipley Institute of Living Scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
55. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
56. Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1994). Memory for facts, source, and context: Can frontal lobe dysfunction explain age-related differences? Psychology and Aging, 9, 149-159.
57. Steffens, M. C., Buchner, A., Martensen, H., & Erdfelder, E. (2000). Further evidence on the similarity of memory processes in the process dissociation procedure and in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1152-1164.
58. Verhaeghen, P., & Salthouse, T. A. (1997). Meta-analyses of age-cognition relations in adulthood: Estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 231-249.
59. Waugh, N. C., & Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory. Psychological Review, 72, 89-104.
60. Yarmey, A. D. (1996). The elderly witness. In S. L. Sporer (Ed.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 259-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Response bias and the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 422-434.
62. Zacks, R. T., & Hasher, L. (1998). Cognitive gerontology and attentional inhibition: A reply to Burke and McDowd. Journal of Gerontology, 52B, P274-P283.
63. Zacks, R. T., Radvansky, G., & Hasher, L. (1996). Studies of directed forgetting in older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 143-156.