Working Memory Capacity and Suppression

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 418-436

  Rosen, Virginia M ^a   Engle, Randall W ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001618242     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2590     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anderson M. C., Bjork R. A. Mechanisms of inhibition in long-term memory. Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. 1994;Academic Press, San Diego. p. 265-325.
2. Anderson J. A. Interference: The relationship between response latency and response accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 7:1981;326-343.
3. Baddeley A. Working memory. 1986;Oxford Univ. Press, London/New York.
4. Baddeley A., Della Sala S. Working memory and executive control. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 351:1996;1397-1404.
5. Baddeley A., Della Sala S., Papagno C., Spinnler H. Dual-task performance in dysexecutive and nondysexecutive patients with a frontal lesion. Neuropsychology. 11:1997;187-194.
6. Baddeley A., Hitch G. J. Working memory. Bower G. Recent advances in learning and motivation. 1974;47-90 Academic Press, New York.
7. Baddeley A., Wilson B. Frontal amnesia and the dysexecutive syndrome. Brain and Cognition. 7:1988;212-230.
8. Bjork R. A. Retrieval inhibition as an adaptive mechanism in human memory. Roediger H. L., Craik F. I. M. Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honor of Endel Tulving. 1989;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
9. Conway A., Engle R. W. Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 123:1994;354-373.
10. Daneman M., Carpenter P. A. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 19:1980;450-466.
11. Daneman M., Carpenter P. A. Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 9:1983;561-583.
12. Daneman M., Green I. Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language. 25:1986;1-18.
13. Dempster F. N. Proactive interference in sentence recall: Topic similarity effects and individual differences. Memory and Cognition. 13:1985;81-89.
14. Dempster F. N. Inhibitory processes: A neglected dimension of intelligence. Intelligence. 15:1991;157-173.
15. Dempster F. N. The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review. 12:1992;45-75.
16. Dempster F. N., Cooney J. B. Individual differences in digit span, susceptibility to proactive interference, and aptitude/achievement test scores. Intelligence. 6:1982;399-416.
17. Diamond S., Balvin R. S., Diamond F. R. Inhibition and choice. 1963;Harper & Row, New York.
18. Donahoe J. W., Palmer D. G. Inhibition: A cautionary tale. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 50:1988;333-341.
19. Duncan J., Emslie H., Williams P. Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goal-directed behavior. Cognitive Psychology. 30:1996;257-303.
20. Engle R. W. Working memory and retrieval: An inhibition-resource approach. Working memory and human cognition. 1996;Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
21. Engle R. W., Carullo J. J., Collins K. W. Individual differences in working memory for comprehension and following directions. Journal of Educational Research. 84:1991;253-262.
22. Engle R. W., Conway A. R. A., Tuholski S. W., Shisler R. J. A resource account of inhibition. Psychological Science. 6:1995;122-125.
23. Engle, R. W. Oransky, N. The evolution from short-term to working memory: Multi-store to dynamic models of temporary storage, Robert, J. Sternberg, The concept of cognition, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
24. Engle, R. W. Tuholski, S. W. Laughlin, J. E. Conway, A. R. A. Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach, Journal of Experimental Psychology, General.
25. Francis W. N., Kucera H. Frequency analysis of English usage. 1982;Houghton Mifflin Co, Boston.
26. Gernsbacher M. A., Faust M. E. The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 17:1991;245-262.
27. Hasher L., Stoltzfus E. R., Zacks R. T., Rypma B. Age and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 17:1991;163-169.
28. Hasher L., Zacks R. T. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 22:1988;193-225.
29. King J., Just M. A. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;580-602.
30. Kyllonen P. C., Christal R. E. Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity? Intelligence. 14:1990;389-433.
31. Kyllonen P. C., Stephens D. L. Cognitive abilities as determinants of success in acquiring logic skill. Special issue: Frontiers of learning and individual differences: Paradigms in transition. Learning and Individual Differences. 2:1990;129-160.
32. MacDonald M. C., Just M. A., Carpenter P. A. Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology. 24:1992;56-98.
33. Melton A. W., Irwin J. M. The influence of degree of interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses. The American Journal of Psychology. 53:1940;173-203.
34. Neill W. T. Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 3:1977;444-450.
35. Neill W. T. Lexical ambiguity and context: An activation-suppression model. Gorfein D. S. Resolving semantic ambiguity. 1989;Springer-Verlag, New York.
36. Neill W. T., Valdes L. A., Terry K. M. Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. Dempster F. N., Brainerd C. J. New perspectives on interference and inhibition in cognition. 1995;207-261 Academic Press, New York.
37. Norman D. A., Shallice T. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. Davidson R. J., Schwarts G. E., Shapiro D. Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory. 1986;1-18 Plenum Press, New York.
38. Perfetti C. A., Lesgold A. M. Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. Just M. A., Carpenter P. A. Cognitive processes in comprehension. 1977;John Wiley & Sons, New York.
39. Posner M. I., Peterson S. E. The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 13:1990;25-42.
40. Roediger H. L., Neely J. H. Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 36:1982;213-242.
41. Rosen V. M., Engle R. W. The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 126:1997;211-227.
42. Schneider W. Micro experimental laboratory: An integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers. 20:1988;206-217.
43. Shallice T., Burgess P. W. Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in men. Brain. 114:1991;727-741.
44. Shiffrin R. M. Attention. Atkinson R. Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology. 1988;Wiley, New York.
45. Shimamura A. P., Jurica P. J., Mangels J. A., Gershberg F. B., Knight R. T. Susceptibility to memory interference effects following frontal lobe damage: Findings from tests of paired-associate learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 7:1995;144-152.
46. Shute V. J. Who is likely to acquire programming skills? Journal of Educational Computing Research. 7:1991;1-24.
47. Tipper S. P., Cranston M. Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 37A:1985;591-611.
48. Turner M. L., Engle R. W. Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language. 28:1989;127-154.
49. Uhl F., Franzen P., Serles W., Lang W., Lindinger G., Deecke L. Anterior frontal cortex and the effect of proactive interference in paired associate learning: A DC potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2:1990;373-382.
50. Winocur G., Moscovitch M. Paired-associate learning in institutionalized and noninstitutionalized old people: An analysis of interference and context effects. Journal of Gerontology. 38:1983;455-464.