Insertion mutagenesis of Escherichia coli GroEL

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Volumn 302, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 246-252

  Amatore, Danielle ^a   Baneyx, François ^a  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

Hsp60; Permissive site; Structure function; Transposon mutagenesis

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN; PROTEIN GROEL291; PROTEIN GROEL34; PROTEIN GROEL367; PROTEIN GROEL90; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; CELL GROWTH; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ISOMERISM; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; TEMPERATURE; TRANSPOSON; ALLELE; CELL FRACTIONATION; CHEMISTRY; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC COMPLEMENTATION; GENETICS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI; INSERTION SEQUENCES; TRANSPOSONS;

ALLELES; DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE DELETION; GENETIC COMPLEMENTATION TEST; GROEL PROTEIN; MUTAGENESIS, INSERTIONAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; SUBCELLULAR FRACTIONS;

EID: 0037424317     PISSN: 0006291X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00152-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bukau B., Horwich A.L. The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines. Cell. 92:1998;351-366.
2. Gottesman M.E., Hendrickson W.A. Protein folding and unfolding by Escherichia coli chaperones and chaperonins. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3:2000;197-202.
3. Grantcharova V., Alm E.J., Baker D., Horwich A.L. Mechanisms of protein folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11:2001;70-82.
4. Saibil H. Molecular chaperones: containers and surfaces for folding, stabilising or unfolding proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:2000;251-258.
5. Thirumalai D., Lorimer G.H. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30:2001;245-269.
6. Xu Z., Sigler P.B. GroEL/GroES: structure and function of a two-stroke folding machine. J. Struct. Biol. 124:1998;129-141.
7. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hedge R., Boisvert D.C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8. Å Nature. 371:1994;578-586.
8. Boisvert D.C., Wang J., Otwinowski Z., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. The 2.4. Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPγS Nat. Struct. Biol. 3:1996;170-177.
9. Chen S., Roseman A.M., Hunter A.S., Wood S.P., Burston S.G., Ranson N.A., Clarke A.R., Saibil H.R. Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature. 371:1994;261-264.
10. Chen L., Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity. Cell. 99:1999;757-768.
11. Fenton W.A., Kashi Y., Furtak K., Horwich A.L. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature. 371:1994;614-619.
12. Thiyagrajan P., Henderson S.J., Joachimiak A. Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small angle neutron scattering. Structure. 4:1996;79-88.
13. Galán A., Sot B., Llorca O., Carrascosa J.L., Valpuesta J.M., Muga A. Excluded volume effects on the refolding and assembly of an oligomeric protein: GroEL, a case study. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2001;957-964.
14. Ybarra J., Horowitz P.M. Refolding and reassembly of active chaperonin GroEL after denaturation. J. Biol. Chem. 270:1995;22113-22115.
15. Burnett B.P., Horwich A.L., Low K.B. A carboxy-terminal deletion impairs the assembly of GroEL and confers a pleiotropic phenotype in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 176:1994;6980-6985.
16. Horovitz A., Bochkareva E.S., Girshovich A.S. The N-terminus of the molecular chaperonin GroEL is a crucial structural element for its assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 268:1993;9957-9959.
17. McLennan N.F., McAteer S., Masters M. The tail of a chaperonin: the C-terminal region of Escherichia coli GroEL protein. Mol. Microbiol. 14:1994;309-321.
18. Chen J., Smith D.L. Unfolding and disassembly of the chaperonin GroEL occurs via a tetradecameric intermediate with a folded equatorial domain. Biochemistry. 39:2000;4250-4258.
19. Manoil C., Traxler B. insertion of in-frame sequence tags into proteins using transposons. Methods. 20:2000;55-61.
20. Manoil C., Bailey J. A simple screen for permissive sites in proteins: analysis of the Escherichia coli lac permease. J. Mol. Biol. 267:1997;250-263.
21. Tilly K., Murialdo H., Georgopoulos C. Identification of a second Escherichia coli groE gene whose product is necessary for bacteriophage morphogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 78:1981;1629-1633.
22. Murai N., Makino Y., Yoshida M. GroEL locked in a closed conformation by an interdomain cross-link can bind ATP and polypeptide but cannot process further reaction steps. J. Biol. Chem. 271:1996;28229-28234.
23. Goloubinoff P., Gatenby A.A., Lorimer G.H. GroE heat-shock proteins promote assembly of foreign prokaryotic ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase oligomers in Escherichia coli. Nature. 337:1989;44-47.
24. Thomas J.G., Baneyx F. Protein misfolding and inclusion body formation in recombinant Escherichia coli cells overproducing heat-shock proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 271:1996;11141-11147.
25. Wessel D., Flügge U.I. A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. Anal. Biochem. 138:1984;141-143.
26. Harris J., Zahn R., Plückthun A. Electron microscopy of the GroEL-GroES filament. J. Struct. Biol. 115:1995;68-77.
27. Bailey J., Manoil C. Identification of permissive and non-permissive peptide insertion sites in β-galactosidase using EZ::Tn in-frame linker insertion kit. Epicentre Forum. 8:2001;1-3.
28. Nelson B.D., Manoil C., Traxler B. Insertion mutagenesis of the lac repressor and its implications for structure-function analysis. J. Bacteriol. 179:1997;3721-3728.
29. Lewis M., Chang G., Horton N.C., Kercher M.A., Pace H.C., Schumacher M.A., Brennan R.G., Lu P. Crystal structure of the lactose operon repressor and its complexes with DNA and inducer. Science. 271:1996;1247-1254.
30. Jacobson R.H., Zhang X.-J., DuBose R.F., Matthews B.W. Three-dimensional structure of β-galactosidase from E. coli. Nature. 369:1994;761-766.
31. 7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:1997;741-750.
32. Zahn R., Buckle A.M., Perret S., Johnson C.M., Corrales F.J., Golbik R., Fersht A.R. Chaperone activity and structure of monomeric polypeptide binding domains of GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;15024-15029.
33. Gorovits B.M., Seale J.W., Horowitz P.M. Residual structure in urea-denatured chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 34:1995;13928-13933.
34. Chatellier J., Hill F., Lund P.A., Fersht A.R. In vivo activities of GroEL minichaperones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998;9861-9866.
35. Tanaka N., Fersht A.R. Identification of substrate binding site of GroEL minichaperone in solution. J. Mol. Biol. 292:1999;173-180.
36. Ayling A., Baneyx F. Influence of the GroE molecular chaperone machine on the in vitro folding of Escherichia coli β-galactosidase. Protein Sci. 5:1996;478-487.
37. Baneyx F., Gatenby A.A. A mutation in GroEL interferes with protein folding by reducing the rate of discharge of sequestered polypeptides. J. Biol. Chem. 267:1992;11637-11644.