Identification of substrate binding site of GroEL minichaperone in solution

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 292, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 173-180

  Tanaka, Naoki ^a   Fersht, Alan R ^b  

^a KYOTO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Denatured; Fluorescence anisotropy; Folding; Pepsin; Protein; lactalbumin

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN; CYSTEINE; FLUORESCENT DYE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ALPHA HELIX; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BINDING COMPETITION; BINDING SITE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL; DISSOCIATION CONSTANT; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; FLUORESCENCE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 0033543671     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3041     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Altamirano M. M., Golbik R., Zahn R., Buckle A. M., Fersht A. R. Refolding chromatography with immobilized mini-chaperones. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;3576-3578.
2. Altamirano M. M., Garcia C., Possani L. D., Fersht A. R. Oxidative refolding chromatography: folding of the scorpion toxin Cn5. Nature Biotechnol. 17:1999;187-191.
3. Aoki K., Taguchi H., Shindo Y., Yoshida M., Ogasawara K., Yutani K., Tanaka N. Calorimetric observation of a GroEL-protein binding reaction with little contribution of hydrophobic interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;32158-32162.
4. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hedge R., Biosvert D. C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A. L., Sigler P. B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å Nature. 371:1994;578-586.
5. Braig K., Adams P. D., Brunger A. T. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature Struct. Biol. 2:1995;1083-1094.
6. Brazil B. T., Cleland J. L., McDowell R. S., Skelton N. J., Paris K., Horowitz P. M. Model peptide studies demonstrate that amphipathic secondary structure can be recognized by the chaperonin GroEL (Cpn60). J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;5105-5111.
7. Buckle A. M., Zahn R., Fersht A. R. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;3571-3575.
8. Chatellier J., Hill F., Lund P. A., Fersht A. R. In vivo activities of GroEL minichaperones. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998;9861-9866.
9. Chatellier J., Buckle A. M., Fersht A. R. GroEL recognises sequential and non-sequential linear structural motifs compatible with extended β-strands and α-helices. J. Mol. Biol. 292:1999;163-172.
10. Dandliker W. B., Hus M., Levin J., Rao R. Equilibrium and kinetic inhibition assays based upon fluorescence polarization. Methods Enzymol. 74:1981;3-29.
11. Ellis R. J., Hartl F. U. Protein folding in the cell: competing models of chaperonin function. FASEB J. 10:1996;20-26.
12. Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. GroEL-mediated protein folding. Protein Sci. 6:1993;1379-1385.
13. Fenton W. A., Kashi Y., Furtak K., Horwich A. L. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature. 371:1994;614-619.
14. Gray T. E., Fersht A. R. Refolding of barnase in the presence of GroE. J. Mol. Biol. 232:1993;1197-1207.
15. Hayer-Hartl M. K., Ewbank J. J., Creighton T. E., Hartl F. U. Conformational specificity of the chaperonin GroEL for the compact folding intermediates of α-lactalbumin. EMBO J. 13:1994;3192-3202.
16. Itzhaki L. S., Otzen D. E., Fersht A. R. Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. Biochemistry. 34:1995;14581-14587.
17. Katsumata K., Okazaki A., Kuwajima K. Effect of GroEL on the re-folding kinetics of α-lactalbumin. J. Mol. Biol. 258:1996a;827-838.
18. Katsumata K., Okazaki A., Tsurupa G. P., Kuwajima K. Dominant forces in the recognition of a transient folding intermediate of a-lactalbumin by GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 264:1996b;643-649.
19. Klotz I. M. Ligand-Receptor Energetics. 1997;John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.
20. Kobayashi N., Freund S. M. V., Chatellier J., Fersht A. R. NMR analysis of the binding of a rhodanese peptide to a minichaperone in solution. J. Mol. Biol. 292:1999;181-190.
21. Kraulis P. J. MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallog. 24:1991;946-950.
22. Kuwajima K. Protein folding in vitro. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 3:1992;462-467.
23. Landry S. J., Gierasch L. M. The chaperonin GroEL binds a polypeptide in an alpha-helical conformation. Biochemistry. 30:1991;7359-7362.
24. Lin X., Loy J. A., Sussman F., Tang J. Conformational instability of the N- and C-terminal lobes of porcine pepsin in neutral and alkaline solutions. Protein Sci. 2:1993;1383-1390.
25. Lorimer G. H. A quantitative assessment of the role of chaperonin proteins in protein folding in vivo. FASEB J. 10:1996;5-9.
26. Merritt E. A., Bacon D. J. Raster3D photorealistics molecular graphics. Methods Enzymol. 277:1997;505-524.
27. Miroux B., Walker J. E. Over-production of protein in Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow synthesis of some membrane proteins and globular proteins at high level. J. Mol. Biol. 260:1996;289-298.
28. Okazaki A., Ikura T., Nikaido K., Kuwajima K. The chaperonin GroEL does not recognize apo-α-lactalbumin in the molten globule state. Nature Struct. Biol. 1:1994;439-446.
29. Perrett S., Zahn R., Stenberg G., Fersht A. R. Importance of electrostatic interactions in the rapid binding of polypeptides to GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 269:1997;892-901.
30. Perrin F. Polarisation de la lumière de fluorescence vie moyenne des molecules dans l'êtat excité J. Phys. Radium. 7:1926;390-401.
31. Robinson C. V., Gros M., Eyles S. J., Ewbank J. J., Mayhew M., Hartl F. U., Dobson C. M., Radford S. E. Conformation for GroEL-bound α-lactalbumin probed by mass spectrometry. Nature. 372:1994;646-651.
32. Roseman A. M., Chen S., White H., Braig K., Saibil H. R. The chaperonin ATPase cycle:mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of subunit. Cell. 87:1996;241-251.
33. Tsurupa G. P., Ikura T., Makio T., Kuwajima K. Refolding kinetics of staphylococcal nuclease and its mutants in the presence of the chaperonin GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 277:1998;733-745.
34. Wang J. D., Michelitsch M. D., Weissman J. S. GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding requires an intact central cavity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998;12163-12168.
35. Weber F., Keppel F., Georgopoulos C., Hayer-Hartl M. K., Hartl F. U. The oligomeric structure of GroEL/GroES is required for biologically significant chaperonin function in protein folding. Nature Struct. Biol. 11:1998;977-985.
36. Xu Z., Horwich A. L., Sigler P. B. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:1997;741-750.
37. Zahn R., Buckle A. M., Perrett S., Johnson C. M., Corrales F. J., Golbik R., Fersht A. R. Chaperone activity and structure of monomeric polypeptide binding domains of GroEL. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;15024-15029.