Differences in the processing of DNA ends in Arabidopsis thaliana and tobacco: Possible implications for genome evolution

Plant Molecular Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 523-531

  Orel, Nadiya ^a   Puchta, Holger ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS AND CROP PLANT RESEARCH IPK   (Germany)

Author keywords

C value paradox; Deletion; DNA recombination; NHEJ; Plant genome size

Indexed keywords

DNA SEQUENCES; GENES; PLANTS (BOTANY); TISSUE;

DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS (DSB);

TOBACCO;

ARABIDOPSIS; DNA REPAIR; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, ENZYMOLOGIC; GENOME, PLANT; GLUCURONIDASE; MUTAGENESIS, INSERTIONAL; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; PLASMIDS; PROMOTER REGIONS (GENETICS); RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; TOBACCO;

GENES; NUCLEIC ACIDS; PLANTS; TISSUE; TOBACCO;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; EMBRYOPHYTA; NICOTIANA; NICOTIANA TABACUM;

EID: 0037342581     PISSN: 01674412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022324205661     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 796-815.
2. Bennett, M.D. and Leitch, I.J. 1997. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: 583 new estimates. Annal. Bot. 80: 169-196.
3. Bennetzen, J.L. and Kellog, E.A. 1997. Do plants have a one-way ticket to the genomic obesity? Plant Cell 9: 1509-1514.
4. Capy, P. 2000. Perspectives: evolution. Is bigger better in cricket? Science 287: 985-986.
5. Cavalier-Smith, T. 1985. The Evolution of Genome Size. John Wiley, Chichester, UK.
6. Chiurazzi, M., Ray, A., Viret., J.-F., Perera, R., Wang, X.-H., Lloyd, A. and Signer, E.R.. 1996. Enhancement of somatic intrachromosomal homologous recombination in Arabidopsis by HO-endonuclease. Plant Cell 8: 2057-2066.
7. Dove, G.A. and Flavell, R.B. 1988. Genome Evolution. Academic Press, London.
8. Gorbunova, V. and Levy, A.A. 1999. How plants make ends meet: DNA double-strand break repair. Trends Plant Sci. 4: 263-269.
9. Gorbunova, V. and Levy, A.A. 1997. Non-homologous DNA end joining in plant cells is associated with deletions and filler DNA insertions. Nucl. Acids Res. 25: 4650-4657.
10. Jasin, M. 2000. Chromosome breaks and genomic instability. Cancer Invest. 18: 78-86.
11. Kirik, A., Salomon, S. and Puchta, H. 2000. Species-specific double-strand break repair and genome evolution in plants. EMBO J. 19: 5562-5566.
12. Liang, F., Romanienko, P.J., Weaver, D.T., Jeggo, P.A. and Jasin, M. 1996. Chromosomal double-strand break repair in Ku80-deficient cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 8929-8933.
13. Mengiste, T. and Paszkowski, J. 1999. Prospects for the precise engineering of plant genomes by homologous recombination. J. Biol. Chem. 380: 749-758.
14. Ozkan, H., Levy, A.A. and Feldman, M. 2001. Allopolyploidy-induced rapid genome evolution in the wheat (Aegilops-Triticum) group. Plant Cell 13: 1735-1747.
15. Petrov, D.A. 2001. Evolution of genome size: new approaches to an old problem. Trends Genet. 17: 23-28.
16. Petrov, D.A. 1997. Slow but steady: Reduction of genome size through biased mutation. Plant Cell 9: 1900-1901.
17. Petrov, D.A., Lozovskaya, E.R and Hartl, D.L. 1996. High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila. Nature 384: 346-349.
18. Petrov, D.A., Sangster, T.A., Johnston, J.S., Hartl, D.L. and Shaw, K.L. 2000. Evidence for DNA loss as a determinant of genome size. Science 287: 1060-1062.
19. Pipiras, E., Coquelle, A., Bieth, A. and Debatisse, M. 1998. Interstitial deletions and intrachromosomal amplification initiated from a double-strand break targeted to a mammalian chromosome. EMBO J. 17: 325-333.
20. Puchta, H. 1999. DSB-induced recombination between ectopic homologous sequences in somatic plant cells. Genetics 152: 1173-1181.
21. Puchta, H. and Hohn, B. 1991. A transient assay in plant cells reveals a positive correlation between extrachromosomal recombination rates and length of homologous overlap. Nucl. Acids Res. 19: 2693-2700.
22. Puchta, H. and Hohn, B. 1996. From centiMorgans to basepairs: homologous recombination in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 1: 340-348.
23. Salomon, S. and Puchta, H. 1998. Capture of genomic and T-DNA sequences during double-strand break repair in somatic plant cells. EMBO J. 17: 6086-6095.
24. SanMiguel, P., Tikhonov, A., Jin, Y.K., Motchoulskaia, N., Zakharov, D., Melake-Berhan, A., Springer, P.S., Edwards, K.J., Lee, M., Avramova, Z. and Bennetzen, J.L. 1996. Nested retrotransposons in the intergenic regions of the maize genome. Science 274: 765-768.
25. SanMiguel, P., Gaut, B.S., Tikhonov, A., Nakajima, Y. and Bennetzen, J.L. 1998. The paleontology of intergene retrotransposons of maize. Nature Genet. 20: 43-45.
26. Seki, M., Iida, A. and Morikawa, H. 1999. Transient expression of the β-glucuronidase gene in tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana by bombardment-mediated transformation. Mol. Biotechnol. 11: 251-255.
27. Shaked, H., Kashkush, K., Ozkan, H., Feldman, M. and Levy, A.A. 2001. Sequence elimination and cytosine methylation are rapid and reproducible responses of the genome to wide hybridization and allopolyploidy in wheat. Plant Cell 13: 1749-1759.
28. Shalev, G. and Levy, A.A. 1997. The maize transposable element Ac induces recombination between the donor site and an homologous ectopic sequence. Genetics 146: 1143-1151.
29. Siebert, R. and Puchta, H. 2002. Efficient repair of genomic double-strand breaks via homologous recombination between directly repeated sequences in the plant genome. Plant Cell 14: 1121-1131.
30. Smith, GP. 1976. Evolution of repeated DNA sequences by unequal crossover. Science 191: 528-535.
31. Vergunst, A.C. and Hooykaas, P.J.J. 1999. Recombination in the plant genome and its application in biotechnology. Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci. 18: 1-31.
32. Walbot, V. 1996. Sources and consequences of phenotypic and genotypic plasticity in flowering plants. Trends Plant Sci. 1: 27-33.
33. Xiao, Y.L, Peterson, T. 2000. Intrachromosomal homologous recombination in Arabidopsis induced by a maize transposon. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263: 22-29.