Protein complexes and proteome organization from yeast to man

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 21-27

  Gavin, Anne Claude ^a   Superti Furga, Giulio ^a  

^a GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; PROTEOME;

CELL FUNCTION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; YEAST;

EID: 0037306721     PISSN: 13675931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1367-5931(02)00007-8     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Alberts B. The cell as a collection of protein machines: preparing the next generation of molecular biologists. Cell. 92:1998;291-294.
2. Uetz P., Giot L., Cagney G., Mansfield T.A., Judson R.S., Knight J.R., Lockshon D., Narayan V., Srinivasan M., Pochart P.et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 403:2000;623-627.
3. Ito T., Chiba T., Ozawa R., Yoshida M., Hattori M., Sakaki Y. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;4569-4574.
4. Walhout A.J., Sordella R., Lu X., Hartley J.L., Temple G.F., Brasch M.A., Thierry-Mieg N., Vidal M. Protein interaction mapping in C. elegans using proteins involved in vulval development. Science. 287:2000;116-122.
5. McCraith S., Holtzman T., Moss B., Fields S. Genome-wide analysis of vaccinia virus protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97:2000;4879-4884.
6. Rain J.C., Selig L., De Reuse H., Battaglia V., Reverdy C., Simon S., Lenzen G., Petel F., Wojcik J., Schachter V.et al. The protein-protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature. 409:2001;211-215.
7. Ellis R.J. Macromolecular crowding: an important but neglected aspect of the intracellular environment. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11:2001;114-119.
8. Ellis R.J. Macromolecular crowding: obvious but underappreciated. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26:2001;597-604.
9. Heal J.R., Roberts G.W., Raynes J.G., Bhakoo A., Miller A.D. Specific interactions between sense and complementary peptides: the basis for the proteomic code. Chembiochem. 3:2002;136-151.
10. Pawson T., Raina M., Nash P. Interaction domains: from simple binding events to complex cellular behavior. FEBS Lett. 513:2002;2-10 The review describes the basic features of interaction domains and discusses how rather simple binary interactions could be used to generate complex cellular responses.
11. Lo Conte L., Chothia C., Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol. 285:1999;2177-2198.
12. Courey A.J. Cooperativity in transcriptional control. Curr. Biol. 11:2001;R250-252.
13. Goto N.K., Zor T., Martinez-Yamout M., Dyson H.J., Wright P.E. Cooperativity in transcription factor binding to the coactivator CBP: the MLL activation domain binds to an allosteric site on the KIX domain. J. Biol. Chem. 29:2002;29.
14. Andersen P.S., Schuck P., Sundberg E.J., Geisler C., Karjalainen K., Mariuzza R.A. Quantifying the energetics of cooperativity in a ternary protein complex. Biochemistry. 41:2002;5177-5184 The authors describe plasmon resonance techniques and mathematical modeling approaches for the quantitative measurement of cooperative binding between a superantigen/histocompatibility complex/T cell receptor complex. They discuss the general applicability of this approach to other systems involving cooperativity.
15. Demchenko A.P. Recognition between flexible protein molecules: induced and assisted folding. J. Mol. Recognit. 14:2001;42-61.
16. Grandi P., Rybin V., Bassler J., Petfalski E., Strauss D., Marzioch M., Schafer T., Kuster B., Tschochner H., Tollervey D.et al. 90S pre-ribosomes include the 35S pre-rRNA, the U3 snoRNP, and 40S subunit processing factors but predominantly lack 60S synthesis factors. Mol. Cell. 10:2002;105-115.
17. Kruger E., Kloetzel P.M., Enenkel C. 20S proteasome biogenesis. Biochimie. 83:2001;289-293.
18. Kurucz E., Ando I., Sumegi M., Holzl H., Kapelari B., Baumeister W., Udvardy A. Assembly of the Drosophila 26 S proteasome is accompanied by extensive subunit rearrangements. Biochem. J. 365:2002;527-536.
19. ••], this paper reports the first large-scale analyses of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, using affinity chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry techniques. The authors concentrated their analysis on proteins involved in cell signaling and DNA repair. More than 1500 different proteins were characterized from ∼600 purifications.
20. ••], this paper report the first large-scale analyses of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, using affinity chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry techniques. The bioinformatics analysis of more than 580 purifications allowed the characterization of about 230 protein complexes linked in a large network and provides the first draft of the functional organization of a eukaryotic proteome.
21. Kemmeren P., van Berkum N.L., Vilo J., Bijma T., Donders R., Brazma A., Holstege F.C. Protein interaction verification and functional annotation by integrated analysis of genome-scale data. Mol. Cell. 9:2002;1133-1143 The authors explore how large-scale analysis of mRNA expression can be applied to predict protein-protein interaction. They describe an optimized approach for the analysis of protein-protein interaction pairs and compare different large-scale sets of data on interactions.
22. Bader G.D., Hogue C.W. Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources. Nat. Biotechnol. 20:2002;991-997 The authors investigated the overlaps, biases and complementarities among the large-scale protein interaction dataset: two hybrids and complexes analysis by mass spectrometry. They could also identify a large and so far unexpected nucleolar complex.
23. von Mering C., Krause R., Snel B., Cornell M., Oliver S.G., Fields S., Bork P. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature. 417:2002;399-403 The paper measures the overlaps, biases and complementarities among the large-scale protein interaction datasets: two hybrids and complexes analysis by mass spectrometry. The methods were compared with each other and to a reference set of previously reported protein interactions.
24. Jansen R., Greenbaum D., Gerstein M. Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. Genome Res. 12:2002;37-46.
25. Edwards A., Kus B., Jansen R., Greenbaum D., Greenblatt J., Gerstein M. Bridging structural biology and genomics: assessing protein interaction data with known complexes. Trends Genet. 18:2002;529 The paper provides analyses of the reliability of protein-protein interaction datasets: large-scale two-hybrids, large-scale complexes analysis, but also individual interactions reported in the literature. The authors observe that, generally, binary protein-protein interactions map 3D structure data only poorly.
26. Aloy P., Russell R.B. Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:2002;5896-5901 The authors present a method to model putative interactions using homologous complexes of known 3D structure. They explore the intersection between complexes of known structure and interactions proposed between yeast proteins by methods such as two-hybrids. This analysis illustrates the importance of incorporating 3D structure information into studies of protein-protein interactions.
27. Zerbe L.K., Kuchta R.D. The p58 subunit of human DNA primase is important for primer initiation, elongation, and counting. Biochemistry. 41:2002;4891-4900.
28. Mizuno T., Yamagishi K., Miyazawa H., Hanaoka F. Molecular architecture of the mouse DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex. Mol. Cell Biol. 19:1999;7886-7896.
29. Gnatt A.L., Cramer P., Fu J., Bushnell D.A., Kornberg R.D. Structural basis of transcription: an RNA polymerase II elongation complex at 3.3 Å resolution. Science. 292:2001;1876-1882.
30. Cramer P., Bushnell D.A., Kornberg R.D. Structural basis of transcription: RNA polymerase II at 2.8 angstrom resolution. Science. 292:2001;1863-1876.
31. Obaya A.J., Sedivy J.M. Regulation of cyclin-Cdk activity in mammalian cells. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 59:2002;126-142.
32. Ge B., Gram H., Di Padova F., Huang B., New L., Ulevitch R.J., Luo Y., Han J. MAPKK-independent activation of p38alpha mediated by TAB1-dependent autophosphorylation of p38alpha. Science. 295:2002;1291-1294.
33. Johnson G. Signal transduction. Scaffolding proteins-more than meets the eye. Science. 295:2002;1249-1250.
34. Kim D.H., Sarbassov D.D., Ali S.M., King J.E., Latek R.R., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Sabatini D.M. mTOR interacts with raptor to form a nutrient-sensitive complex that signals to the cell growth machinery. Cell. 110:2002;163-175 The authors report the identification in a two-hybrid screen of a novel mTOR interactor raptor. Further extensive analysis of this interaction leads to a model in which mTOR and raptor constitutively interacts in a weak interaction that is required for mTOR signaling. Under nutrient-poor conditions, the binding is strengthened by an additional interaction, leading to mTOR inhibition.
35. Lemon B., Tjian R. Orchestrated response: a symphony of transcription factors for gene control. Genes Dev. 14:2000;2551-2569.
36. Maniatis T., Reed R. An extensive network of coupling among gene expression machines. Nature. 416:2002;499-506 This review gives a very comprehensive and thorough view on the integration and coupling of the gene-expression machineries.
37. Hakimi M.A., Bochar D.A., Schmiesing J.A., Dong Y., Barak O.G., Speicher D.W., Yokomori K., Shiekhattar R. A chromatin remodelling complex that loads cohesin onto human chromosomes. Nature. 418:2002;994-998 This paper reports the analysis of the ISWI chromatin remodeling complex by chromatographic and mass spectrometry methods. It describes an ISWI chromatin remodeling sub-complex that is physically bound to components of the cohesin. The authors propose further evidence pointing to a functional role of this association in the loading of cohesin on the chromatin.
38. Marx S.O., Kurokawa J., Reiken S., Motoike H., D'Armiento J., Marks A.R., Kass R.S. Requirement of a macromolecular signaling complex for beta adrenergic receptor modulation of the KCNQ1-KCNE1 potassium channel. Science. 295:2002;496-499 The authors report the functional association of the KCNQ1-KCNE1 potassium channel with the scaffolding protein Yotiao. Yotiao is required for the β-adrenergic-induced phosphorylation and activation of the channel by protein kinase A. Yotiao also docks the protein phosphatase 1 that dephosphorylates and inactivates the potassium channel.
39. Park J., Kunjibettu S., McMahon S.B., Cole M.D. The ATM-related domain of TRRAP is required for histone acetyltransferase recruitment and Myc-dependent oncogenesis. Genes Dev. 15:2001;1619-1624.
40. Johnson C.A., White D.A., Lavender J.S., O'Neill L.P., Turner B.M. Human class I histone deacetylase complexes show enhanced catalytic activity in the presence of ATP and co-immunoprecipitate with the ATP- dependent chaperone protein Hsp70. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;9590-9597 The paper reports the stable and functional association of the chaperone protein Hsp70 with several histone class I deacetylase complexes. The authors propose that Hsp70 may be involved in nucleosome remodeling.
41. Forsythe H.L., Jarvis J.L., Turner J.W., Elmore L.W., Holt S.E. Stable association of hsp90 and p23, but Not hsp70, with active human telomerase. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2001;15571-15574.
42. Schwikowski B., Uetz P., Fields S. A network of protein-protein interactions in yeast. Nat. Biotechnol. 18:2000;1257-1261.
43. Jeong H., Mason S.P., Barabasi A.L., Oltvai Z.N. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature. 411:2001;41-42.
44. Vidal M. A biological atlas of functional maps. Cell. 104:2001;333-339.
45. Robinson R.C., Turbedsky K., Kaiser D.A., Marchand J.B., Higgs H.N., Choe S., Pollard T.D. Crystal structure of Arp2/3 complex. Science. 294:2001;1679-1684 The authors determined the crystal structure of the Arp2/3 complex, an assembly of seven proteins that initiates actin polymerization in all eukaryotic cells. The analysis provides insight on the functions and the mechanisms involved in this essential process.
46. Thrasher A.J. WASp in immune-system organization and function. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2:2002;635-646.
47. Ogawa H., Ishiguro K., Gaubatz S., Livingston D.M., Nakatani Y. A complex with chromatin modifiers that occupies E2F- and Myc-responsive genes in G0 cells. Science. 296:2002;1132-1136 This paper reports the characterization of a new protein complex involved in the repression of E2F- and Myc-responsive genes in quiescent cells. The authors propose a model for the assembly of the complex at the targeted promoters and for the propagation of chromatin inactivation that lead to entire repressed regions.
48. Collins B.M., McCoy A.J., Kent H.M., Evans P.R., Owen D.J. Molecular architecture and functional model of the endocytic AP2 complex. Cell. 109:2002;523-535.
49. Yang T., Espenshade P.J., Wright M.E., Yabe D., Gong Y., Aebersold R., Goldstein J.L., Brown M.S. Crucial step in cholesterol homeostasis: sterols promote binding of SCAP to INSIG-1, a membrane protein that facilitates retention of SREBPs in ER. Cell. 110:2002;489-500.