Peptide libraries: At the crossroads of proteomics and bioinformatics

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 84-90

  Turk, Benjamin E ^a   Cantley, Lewis C ^a  

^a BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PROTEIN;

BIOINFORMATICS; GENOME; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 0037305948     PISSN: 13675931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1367-5931(02)00004-2     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Altschul S.F., Madden T.L., Schaffer A.A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:1997;3389-3402.
2. Sonnhammer E.L., Eddy S.R., Durbin R. Pfam: a comprehensive database of protein domain families based on seed alignments. Proteins. 28:1997;405-420.
3. Ponting C.P., Schultz J., Milpetz F., Bork P. SMART: identification and annotation of domains from signalling and extracellular protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:1999;229-232.
4. Ge H., Liu Z., Church G.M., Vidal M. Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Genet. 29:2001;482-486.
5. Kumar A., Agarwal S., Heyman J.A., Matson S., Heidtman M., Piccirillo S., Umansky L., Drawid A., Jansen R., Liu Y.et al. Subcellular localization of the yeast proteome. Genes Dev. 16:2002;707-719.
6. Ito T., Chiba T., Ozawa R., Yoshida M., Hattori M., Sakaki Y. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;4569-4574.
7. Zhu H., Bilgin M., Bangham R., Hall D., Casamayor A., Bertone P., Lan N., Jansen R., Bidlingmaier S., Houfek T.et al. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science. 293:2001;2101-2105.
8. Shevchenko A., Jensen O.N., Podtelejnikov A.V., Sagliocco F., Wilm M., Vorm O., Mortensen P., Shevchenko A., Boucherie H., Mann M. Linking genome and proteome by mass spectrometry: large-scale identification of yeast proteins from two dimensional gels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93:1996;14440-14445.
9. Yaffe M.B., Elia A.E. Phosphoserine/threonine-binding domains. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13:2001;131-138.
10. Pawson T., Raina M., Nash P. Interaction domains: from simple binding events to complex cellular behavior. FEBS Lett. 513:2002;2-10.
11. Pinilla C., Appel J.R., Blanc P., Houghten R.A. Rapid identification of high affinity peptide ligands using positional scanning synthetic peptide combinatorial libraries. BioTechniques. 13:1992;901-905.
12. Songyang Z., Shoelson S.E., Chaudhuri M., Gish G., Pawson T., Haser W.G., King F., Roberts T., Ratnofsky S., Lechleider R.J.et al. SH2 domains recognize specific phosphopeptide sequences. Cell. 72:1993;767-778.
13. Lam K.S., Salmon S.E., Hersh E.M., Hruby V.J., Kazmierski W.M., Knapp R.J. A new type of synthetic peptide library for identifying ligand-binding activity. Nature. 354:1991;82-84.
14. Houghten R.A., Pinilla C., Blondelle S.E., Appel J.R., Dooley C.T., Cuervo J.H. Generation and use of synthetic peptide combinatorial libraries for basic research and drug discovery. Nature. 354:1991;84-86.
15. Lowman H.B., Bass S.H., Simpson N., Wells J.A. Selecting high-affinity binding proteins by monovalent phage display. Biochemistry. 30:1991;10832-10838.
16. Norman T.C., Smith D.L., Sorger P.K., Drees B.L., O'Rourke S.M., Hughes T.R., Roberts C.J., Friend S.H., Fields S., Murray A.W. Genetic selection of peptide inhibitors of biological pathways. Science. 285:1999;591-595.
17. Wilson D.S., Keefe A.D., Szostak J.W. The use of mRNA display to select high-affinity protein-binding peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;3750-3755.
18. Kessels W.H.G., Ward A.C., Schumacher T.N.M. Specificity and affinity motifs for Grb2 SH2-ligand interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:2002;8524-8529 The authors develop a clever double-labeling flow cytometry method and use it to analyze binding of SH2 domains to one-bead-one-phosphopeptide libraries. The approach facilitates identification of sequences with high specificity of one domain over a large number of closely related domains.
19. Brinker A., Scheufler C., von der Mülbe F., Fleckenstein B., Herrmann C., Jung G., Moarefi I., Hartl F.U. Ligand discrimination by TPR domains. Relevance and selectivity of EEVD-recognition in HsP70 Hop Hsp90 complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;19265-19275 As the mid-90s surface plasmon resonance fad has given way to isothermal titration calorimetry, most departments have a BIAcore machine busy collecting dust. The authors took advantage of unfettered access to the instrument to invent a new way to screen libraries for protein interaction motifs.
20. McGeehan G.M., Bickett D.M., Green M., Kassel D., Wiseman J.S., Berman J. Characterization of the peptide substrate specificities of interstitial collagenase and 92-kDa gelatinase. Implications for substrate optimization. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1994;32814-32820.
21. Gao J., Cheng X., Chen R., Sigal G.B., Bruce J.E., Schwartz B.L., Hofstadler S.A., Anderson G.A., Smith R.D., Whitesides G.M. Screening derivatized peptide libraries for tight binding inhibitors to carbonic anhydrase II by electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. J. Med. Chem. 39:1996;1949-1955.
22. Beebe K.D., Wang P., Arabaci G., Pei D. Determination of the binding specificity of the SH2 domains of protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 through the screening of a combinatorial phosphotyrosyl peptide library. Biochemistry. 39:2000;13251-13260.
23. ••].
24. •], this paper describes an interesting isotopic labeling strategy that facilitates analysis of mixture-based OPLs by mass spectrometry. Significantly, this is only the second paper to determine a true substrate (as opposed to binding) motif for a protein tyrosine phosphatase using peptide libraries.
25. Gygi S.P., Rist B., Gerber S.A., Turecek F., Gelb M.H., Abersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 17:1999;994-999.
26. Matthews D.J., Wells J.A. Substrate phage: selection of protease substrates by monovalent phage display. Science. 260:1993;1113-1117.
27. Meldal M., Svendsen I., Breddam K., Auzanneau F.I. Portion-mixing peptide libraries of quenched fluorogenic substrates for complete subsite mapping of endoprotease specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91:1994;3314-3318.
28. Thornberry N.A., Rano T.A., Peterson E.P., Rasper D.M., Timkey T., Garcia-Calvo M., Houtzager V.M., Nordstrom P.A., Roy S., Vaillancourt J.P.et al. A combinatorial approach defines specificities of members of the caspase family and granzyme B. Functional relationships established for key mediators of apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;17907-17911.
29. Backes B.J., Harris J.L., Leonetti F., Craik C.S., Ellman J.A. Synthesis of positional-scanning libraries of fluorogenic peptide substrates to define the extended substrate specificity of plasmin and thrombin. Nat. Biotechnol. 18:2000;187-193.
30. Harris J.L., Backes B.J., Leonetti F., Mahrus S., Ellman J.A., Craik C.S. Rapid and general profiling of protease specificity by using combinatorial fluorogenic substrate libraries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97:2000;7754-7759.
31. Harris J.L., Alper P.B., Li J., Rechsteiner M., Backes B.J. Substrate specificity of the human proteasome. Chem. Biol. 8:2001;1131-1141 The authors generate a more complex PSL on the basis of their prior work [29,30] that incorporates pairwise combinations of fixed residues. Though the proteasome analysis is complicated by multiple active sites, with the library in hand they should be able to provide valuable information regarding interactions between subsites for a large number of proteolytic enzymes.
32. Nazif T., Bogyo M. Global analysis of proteasomal substrate specificity using positional-scanning libraries of covalent inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:2001;2967-2972 Positional scanning libraries of electrophile protease inhibitors are screened for their ability to compete away binding of a non-specific probe by electrophoresis and autoradiography. With the capacity to analyze simultaneously complex mixtures of proteases by resolving them on a gel, the method wins the high-throughput award hands down.
33. Reineke U., Volkmer-Engert R., Schneider-Mergener J. Applications of peptide arrays prepared by the SPOT-technology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12:2001;59-64.
34. Dekker N., Cox R.C., Kramer R.A., Egmond M.R. Substrate specificity of the integral membrane protease OmpT determined by spatially addressed peptide libraries. Biochemistry. 40:2001;1694-1701 This paper is the first published example using immobilized arrays (SPOT filters) to determine a protease cleavage motif. The authors overcome a technical challenge to the analysis of a large protein complex with immobilized libraries by introducing a long hydrophilic spacer between the membrane and peptide.
35. Kaup M., Dassler K., Reineke U., Weise C., Tauber R., Fuchs H. Processing of the human transferrin receptor at distinct positions within the stalk region by neutrophil elastase and cathepsin G. Biol. Chem. 383:2002;1011-1120.
36. Hu Y., Webb E., Singh J., Morgan B.A., Gainor J.A., Gordon T.D., Siahaan T.J. Rapid determination of substrate specificity of Clostridium histolyticum beta-collagenase using an immobilized peptide library. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;8366-8371.
37. Songyang Z., Blechner S., Hoagland N., Hoekstra M.F., Piwnica-Worms H., Cantley L.C. Use of an oriented peptide library to determine the optimal substrates of protein kinases. Curr. Biol. 4:1994;973-982.
38. Yaffe M.B., Rittinger K., Volinia S., Caron P.R., Aitken A., Leffers H., Gamblin S.J., Smerdon S.J., Cantley L.C. The structural basis for 14-3-3:phosphopeptide binding specificity. Cell. 91:1997;961-971.
39. Turk B.E., Huang L.L., Piro E.T., Cantley L.C. Determination of protease cleavage site motifs using mixture-based oriented peptide libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:2001;661-667 The authors use a mixture-based OPL approach to elucidate the substrate specificity for six MMPs. Significant for being the first synthetic peptide library approach to enable rapid determination of extended cleavage motifs traversing the scissile bond. The paper is also of interest for the use of Scansite to identify an matrix metalloproteinase-2 substrate based on the experimentally determined motif.
40. Mahajan P., Harrison-Shostak D.C., Michaux J., Herman B. Novel mutant green fluorescent protein protease substrates reveal the activation of specific caspases during apoptosis. Chem. Biol. 6:1999;401-409.
41. Zhang A, Ly T, Kodadek T: An inhibitor of sequence-specific proteolysis that targets the substrate rather than the enzyme. Chem Biol 8:391-397.
42. Ting A, Kain KH, Klemke, Tsien RY: Genetically encoded fluorescent reporters of protein tyrosine kinase activities in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:15003-15008.
43. Zhang J, Ma Y, Taylor SS, Tsien RY: Genetically encoded reporters of protein kinase A activity reveal impact of substrate tethering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14997-15002.
44. Yaffe M.B., Leparc G.G., Lai J., Obata T., Volinia S., Cantley L.C. A motif-based profile scanning approach for genome-wide prediction of signaling pathways. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:2001;348-353 The authors describe the first web-accessible program that enables protein sequence database searches with short peptide motifs of the type generated with peptide libraries.
45. Obata T., Yaffe M.B., Leparc G.G., Piro E.T., Maegawa H., Kashiwagi A., Kikkawa R., Cantley L.C. Peptide and protein library screening defines optimal substrate motifs for AKT/PKB. J. Biol. Chem. 275:2000;36108-36115.
46. Zhang H., Zha X., Tan Y., Hornbeck P.V., Mastrangelo A.J., Alessi D.R., Polakiewicz R.D., Comb M.J. Phosphoprotein analysis using antibodies broadly reactive against phosphorylated motifs. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;39379-39387.
47. ••].
48. ••], the authors use the antibody to immunoprecipitate proteins from cell lysates, which enabled their subsequent identification by MS.
49. Tong A.H., Drees B., Nardelli G., Bader G.D., Brannetti B., Castagnoli L., Evangelista M., Ferracuti S., Nelson B., Paoluzi S.et al. A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science. 295:2002;321-324 The authors define binding motifs for most of the SH3 domains in the yeast proteome using phage display followed by database searching to identify candidate interaction partners. They then proceed with high-throughput two hybrid screening using both the SH3-containing proteins and their putative interaction partners as baits. By using the overlap set between the two screening methods, the authors define a protein interaction network that eliminates false positives, which would arise from either method used in isolation.
50. Marcotte E.M., Pellegrini M., Ng H.L., Rice D.W., Yeates T.O., Eisenberg D. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science. 285:1999;751-753.
51. Wollacott A.M., Desjarlais J.R. Virtual interaction profiles of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 313:2001;317-342.