Phylogenetic relationships within the moss family Bryaceae based on chloroplast DNA evidence

Journal of Bryology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 31-40

  Cox, Cymon J ^a   Hedderson, Terry A J ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Bryaceae; Bryopsida; Chloroplast DNA; Phylogenetic relationships; rps4; trnL trnF

Indexed keywords

ACIDODONTIUM; ANOMOBRYUM JULACEUM; BRACHYMENIUM; BRYACEAE; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; BRYUM CAUCASICUM; CAPILLARIA; MACROCARPA; MIELICHHOFERIA MACROCARPA; PLAGIOBRYUM; PTERIDOPHYTA; ROSULABRYUM;

EID: 0037242926     PISSN: 03736687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/037366803125002635     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Andrews AL. 1951. Taxonomic notes 10. The Leptostomataceae. Bryologist 54: 217-223.
2. Bizot M, Pócs T. 1979. East African bryophytes, III. Acta Botanica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 25: 223-261.
3. Brotherus VA. 1924-5. Musci (Laubmoose). III. Unterklasse Bryales: II. Spezieller Teil. In: Engler A, ed. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Engelmann, Leipzig.
4. Buck WR, Goffinet B. 2000. Morphology and classification of mosses. In: Shaw AJ, Goffinet B, eds, Bryophyte biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 71-123.
5. Cox CJ, Hedderson TAJ. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among the ciliate arthrodontous mosses: evidence from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 215: 119-139.
6. Cox CJ, Goffinet B, Newton AE, Shaw AJ, Hedderson TAJ. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the diplolepideous-alternate mosses (Bryidae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. Bryologist 103: 224-241.
7. Crosby MR. 1980. The diversity and relationships of mosses. In: Taylor RJ, Leviton AE, eds, The mosses of North America. San Francisco: Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 115-129.
8. Crosby MR, Magill RE, Allen B, He S. 1999. Checklist of the mosses. Saint Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden.
9. Crum H. 2001. Structural diversity of bryophytes. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Herbarium.
10. Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C. 1991. A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 19: 1349.
11. Felsenstein JS. 1978. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 27: 401-410.
12. Felsenstein JS. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: a justification. Evolution 39: 783-791.
13. Goffinet B, Cox CJ. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among basal-most arthrodontous mosses with special emphasis on the evolutionary significance of the Funariineae. Bryologist 103: 212-223.
14. Goffinet B, Cox CJ, Shaw AJ, Hedderson TAJ. 2001. The Bryophyta (Mosses): systematic and evolutionary inferences from an rps4 gene (cpDNA) phylogeny. Annals of Botany 87: 191-208.
15. Hedderson TA, Harold AS. 1990. Plagiobryum duthiei, a new moss species from Nepal. Lindbergia 16: 51-54.
16. Iwatsuki Z, Koponen T. 1972. On the taxonomy and distribution of Rhodobryum roseum and its related species (Bryophyta). Acta Botanica Fennica 96: 1-22.
17. Kabiersch W. 1936. Studien über die ostasiatischen Arteneiniger Laubmoosfamilien (Mniaceae - Bartramiaceae). Hedwigia 76: 1-94.
18. Lanave C, Preparata C, Saccone C, Serio G. 1984. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. Journal of Molecular Evolution 20: 86-93.
19. Lewis PO. 2001. Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 30-37.
20. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2000. MacClade 3.08a: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, Version 3.0. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
21. Mitten W. 1859. Musci Indiae Orientalis. An enumeration of the mosses of the East Indies. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society: (London). Supplement Botany 1: 1-171.
22. Nadot S, Bittar G, Carter L, Lacroix R, Lejeune B. 1995. A phylogenetic analysis of monocotyledons based on the chloroplast gene rps4, using parsimony and a new numerical phenetics method. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 4: 257-282.
23. Newton AE, Cox CJ, Duckett JG, Wheeler JA, Goffinet B, Hedderson TAJ, Mishler BD. 2000. Evolution of the major moss lineages: phylogenetic analyses based on multiple gene sequences and morphology. Bryologist 103: 187-211.
24. Nyholm E. 1958. Illustrated moss flora of Fennoscandia. II. Musci, Fasc. 3. Lund: Gleerup.
25. Ochi H. 1959. A revision of the Bryaceae in Japan and the adjacent areas. Tottori: Tottori University.
26. Ochi H. 1970. A revision of the subfamily Bryoideae in Australia, Tasmania, New Zealand and the adjacent islands. Journal of the Faculty of Education Tottori University. Natural Science 21: 7-76.
27. Ochi H. 1972. A revision of African Bryoideae, Musci (First Part). Journal of the Faculty of Education Tottori University. Natural Science 23: 1-126.
28. Ochi H. 1980. A revision of Neotropical Bryoideae, Musci (First Part). Journal of the Faculty of Education Tottori University. Natural Science 29: 45-154.
29. Ochi H. 1982. A revision of the Bryoideae (Musci) in southern South America. Journal of the Faculty of Education Tottori University. Natural Science 31: 11-47.
30. Ochi H. 1985. An annotated list of mosses of the subfamily Bryoideae in South, Southeast and East Asia. Journal of the Faculty of Education Tottori University. Natural Science 34: 41-96.
31. Ochi H. 1988. Recent work on a world wide revision of the Bryoideae (Musci). Bryological Times 48: 1-3.
32. Ochi H. 1992. A revised infrageneric classification of the genus Bryum and related genera (Bryaceae, Musci). Bryobrothera 1: 231-244.
33. Pedersen N. 2000. A cladistic overview of the Bryaceae (Musci) based on morphological and anatomical data and with emphasis on the genus Bryum. Journal of Bryology 22: 193-206.
34. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
35. Philibert H. 1884-1902. De l'importance du péristome pour les affinités naturelles des mousses. Revue Bryologique 11: 49-52, 65-72. Etudes sur le péristome. Revue Bryologique 11: 81-87; 12: 67-77, 81-85; 13: 17-27, 81-86; 14: 9-11, 81-90; 15: 6-12, 24-28, 37-44, 50-56, 65-69, 90-93; 16: 1-9, 39-44, 67-77; 17: 8-12, 25-29, 38-42.
36. Philibert H. 1884-1902. De l'importance du péristome pour les affinités naturelles des mousses. Revue Bryologique 11: 49-52, 65-72. Etudes sur le péristome. Revue Bryologique 11: 81-87; 12: 67-77, 81-85; 13: 17-27, 81-86; 14: 9-11, 81-90; 15: 6-12, 24-28, 37-44, 50-56, 65-69, 90-93; 16: 1-9, 39-44, 67-77; 17: 8-12, 25-29, 38-42.
37. Philibert H. 1884-1902. De l'importance du péristome pour les affinités naturelles des mousses. Revue Bryologique 11: 49-52, 65-72. Etudes sur le péristome. Revue Bryologique 11: 81-87; 12: 67-77, 81-85; 13: 17-27, 81-86; 14: 9-11, 81-90; 15: 6-12, 24-28, 37-44, 50-56, 65-69, 90-93; 16: 1-9, 39-44, 67-77; 17: 8-12, 25-29, 38-42.
38. Philibert H. 1884-1902. De l'importance du péristome pour les affinités naturelles des mousses. Revue Bryologique 11: 49-52, 65-72. Etudes sur le péristome. Revue Bryologique 11: 81-87; 12: 67-77, 81-85; 13: 17-27, 81-86; 14: 9-11, 81-90; 15: 6-12, 24-28, 37-44, 50-56, 65-69, 90-93; 16: 1-9, 39-44, 67-77; 17: 8-12, 25-29, 38-42.
39. Philibert H. 1884-1902. De l'importance du péristome pour les affinités naturelles des mousses. Revue Bryologique 11: 49-52, 65-72. Etudes sur le péristome. Revue Bryologique 11: 81-87; 12: 67-77, 81-85; 13: 17-27, 81-86; 14: 9-11, 81-90; 15: 6-12, 24-28, 37-44, 50-56, 65-69, 90-93; 16: 1-9, 39-44, 67-77; 17: 8-12, 25-29, 38-42.
40. Philibert H. 1884-1902. De l'importance du péristome pour les affinités naturelles des mousses. Revue Bryologique 11: 49-52, 65-72. Etudes sur le péristome. Revue Bryologique 11: 81-87; 12: 67-77, 81-85; 13: 17-27, 81-86; 14: 9-11, 81-90; 15: 6-12, 24-28, 37-44, 50-56, 65-69, 90-93; 16: 1-9, 39-44, 67-77; 17: 8-12, 25-29, 38-42.
41. Philibert H. 1884-1902. De l'importance du péristome pour les affinités naturelles des mousses. Revue Bryologique 11: 49-52, 65-72. Etudes sur le péristome. Revue Bryologique 11: 81-87; 12: 67-77, 81-85; 13: 17-27, 81-86; 14: 9-11, 81-90; 15: 6-12, 24-28, 37-44, 50-56, 65-69, 90-93; 16: 1-9, 39-44, 67-77; 17: 8-12, 25-29, 38-42.
42. Philibert H. 1884-1902. De l'importance du péristome pour les affinités naturelles des mousses. Revue Bryologique 11: 49-52, 65-72. Etudes sur le péristome. Revue Bryologique 11: 81-87; 12: 67-77, 81-85; 13: 17-27, 81-86; 14: 9-11, 81-90; 15: 6-12, 24-28, 37-44, 50-56, 65-69, 90-93; 16: 1-9, 39-44, 67-77; 17: 8-12, 25-29, 38-42.
43. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1114-1116.
44. Shoemaker JS, Painter IS, Weir BS. 1999. Bayesian statistics in genetics - a guide for the uninitiated. Trends in Genetics 15: 354-358.
45. Siddall ME, Kluge AG. 1997. Probabilism and phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 13: 313-336.
46. Smith AJE. 1978. The moss flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Spence JR. 1987. A proposed reclassification of Bryum, Anomobryum and Brachymenium (Musci, Bryaceae). Journal of Bryology 14: 659-676.
48. Spence JR. 1996. Rosulabryum genus novum (Bryaceae). Bryologist 99: 221-225.
49. Swofford DL. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
50. Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, eds, Molecular systematics. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, 407-514.
51. Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J. 1991. Universal primers for the amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
52. Walther K. 1983. Bryophytina, Laubmoose. In: Gerloff J, Poelt J, eds, A. Engler Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, 13 Auflage, Herausgegeben von, Kapitel V, 2. Berlin: Borntraeger.