Phylogenetic relationships among the diplolepideous-alternate mosses (Bryidae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences

Bryologist

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 224-241

  Cox, Cymon J ^a,b   Goffinet, Bernard ^c   Newton, Angela E ^a   Shaw, A Jonathan ^b   Hedderson, Terry A J ^d  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL NUCLEUS DNA; CHLOROPLAST DNA; MONOPHYLY; MORPHOLOGY; MOSS; PARAPHYLY; PHYLOGENY; RIBOSOMAL RNA;

BRYALES; BRYIDAE; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; EUKARYOTA; HOOKERIALES; HYPNALES; PTERIDOPHYTA;

EID: 0034086438     PISSN: 00072745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1639/0007-2745(2000)103[0224:PRATDA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. ALBERCH, P., S. J. GOULD, G. F. OSTER & D. B. WAKE. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5: 296-317.
2. BARTRAM, E. B. 1939. Mosses of the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Science 68: 1-437.
3. BAUM, D. A., K. J. SYTSMA & P. C. HOCH. 1994. A phylogenetic analysis of Epilobium (Onagraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 19: 363-388.
4. BECKERT S., S. STEINHAUSER, H. MUHLE & V. KNOOP. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of bryophytes based on nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial nad5 gene. Plant Systematics and Evolution 218: 179-192.
5. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
6. BROTHERUS, V. F. 1924. 10 Band. Musci (Laubmoose), pp. 143-478. In A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds.), Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 1. Hälfte. Engelmann, Leipzig.
7. _. 1925. 11 Band. Musci (Laubmoose), pp. 1-542. In A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds.), Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 2. Hälfte. Engelmann, Leipzig.
8. BOPP, M. & I. CAPESIUS. 1998. A molecular approach to bryophyte systematics, pp. 79-88. In J. W. Bates, N. W. Ashton & J. G. Duckett (eds.), Bryology for the Twenty-First Century. Maney Publishing and British Bryological Society, Leeds, U.K.
9. BUCK, W. R. & D. H. VITT. 1986. Suggestions for a new familial classification of pleurocarpous mosses. Taxon 35: 21-60.
10. CAPESIUS, I. & M. STECH. 1997. Molecular relationships within mosses based on 18S rRNA sequences. Nova Hedwigia 64: 525-533.
11. COX, C. J. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of the Eubryalean mosses (Bryineae, Musci). Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Reading, Reading, U.K.
12. _ & T. A. J. HEDDERSON. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among the ciliate arthrodontous mosses: evidence from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 215: 119-139.
13. CRUM, H. A. & L. E. ANDERSON. 1981. Mosses of Eastern North America, Vols. 1-2. Columbia University Press, NY.
14. DAMANHURI, A. & R. E. LONGTON. 1996. Towards a revision of the moss genus Taxithelium (Sematophyllaceae). Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Botánico 67: 35-58.
15. DE LUNA, E. 1995. The circumscription and phylogenetic relationships of the Hedwigiaceae (Musci). Systematic Botany 20: 347-373.
16. _, A. E. NEWTON, A. WITHEY, D. GONZALEZ & B. D. MISHLER. 1999. The transition to pleurocarpy: A phylogenetic analysis of the main diplolepideous lineages based on rbcL sequences and morphology. THE BRYOLOGIST 102: 634-650.
17. DE PINNA, M. C. C. 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7: 367-394.
18. DIXON, H. N. 1924. The Student's Handbook of British Mosses, 3rd ed. V.V. Sumfield, Eastborne, U.K.
19. _. 1932. Classification of mosses, pp. 397-412. In F. Verdoon (ed.), Manual of Bryology. Martius Nijhoff, The Hague.
20. DONOGHUE, M. J., R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH & J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsicales based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 249-265.
21. DOYLE, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: Molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Systematic Botany 17: 144-163.
22. EDWARDS, S. R. 1979. Taxonomic implications of cell patterns in haplolepideous moss peristomes, pp. 317-346.
23. In G. C. S. Clarke & J. G. Duckett (eds.), Bryophyte Systematics. Systematics Association Special Volume No. 14. Academic Press, London.
24. _. 1984. Homologies and inter-relationships of the moss peristomes, pp. 658-695. In R. M. Schuster (ed.), New Manual of Bryology, Vol. 2. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan, Japan.
25. ERIKSSON, T. & N. WIKSTRÖM. 1995. AutoDecay: program and documentation. Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
26. FAITH, D. P. 1991. Cladistic permutation tests for monophyly and nonmonophyly. Systematic Zoology 40: 366-375.
27. FARRIS, J. S. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology 18: 374-385.
28. _. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic systematics, pp. 7-36. In N. I. Platnick & V. A. Funk (eds.), Advances in Cladistics. Columbia University Press, NY.
29. _. 1989. The retention index and rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
30. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 27: 401-410.
31. _. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
32. FLEISCHER, M. 1920. Natürliches System der Laubmoose. Hedwigia 61: 390-400.
33. _. 1922. Die Musci der Flora von Buitenzorg, pp. xiv-xxi. Bryales: Hypnobryales, Buxbaumiales, Diphysicales, Polytrichales, Vol. 4. E. J. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands.
34. FREY, W. 1977. Neue Vorstellungen über die Verwandtschaftsgruppen und die Stammesgeschichte der Laubmoose, pp. 117-139. In W. Frey, H. Hurka & F. Oberwinkler (eds.), Beiträge zur Biologie der niederen Pflazen. Fischer, Stuttgart, Germany.
35. GOFFINET, B., R. J. BAYER & D. H. VITT. 1998. Circumscription and phylogeny of the Orthotrichales (Bryopsida) inferred from rbcL sequence analyses. American Journal of Botany 85: 1324-1337.
36. _ & C. J. COX. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the basal-most arthrodontous mosses with special emphasis on the evolutionary significance of the Funariineae. THE BRYOLOGIST 103: 212-223.
37. _, J. SHAW, L. E. ANDERSON & B. D. MISHLER. 1999. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. V. Diplolepideae: Orthotrichaceae. THE BRYOLOGIST 102: 581-594.
38. HAMBY, R. K., L. SIMS, L. ISSEL & E. ZIMMER. 1988. Direct ribosomal RNA sequencing: optimisation of extraction and sequencing methods for work with higher plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 6: 175-192.
39. HEDDERSON, T. A., R. CHAPMAN & C. J. COX. 1998. Bryophytes and the origins and diversification of land plants: new evidence from molecules, pp. 65-77. In J. W. Bates, N. W. Ashton & J. G. Duckett (eds.), Bryology for the Twenty-First Century. Maney Publishing and British Bryological Society, Leeds, U.K.
40. _, _ & W. L. ROOTES. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships of the bryophytes inferred from nuclear-encoded rRNA gene sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 200: 213-224.
41. _, C. J. COX & J. G. GIBBINGS. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of the Wardiaceae (Musci); Evidence from 18S rRNA and rps4 gene sequences. THE BRYOLOGIST 102: 26-31.
42. HEDENÄS, L. 1994. The basal pleurocarpous diplolepidous mosses - A cladistic approach. THE BRYOLOGIST 97: 225-243.
43. HILLIS, D. M. & J. J. BULL. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 182-192.
44. _ & J. P. HUELSENBECK. 1992. Signal, noise and reliability of phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Heredity 83: 189-195.
45. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1991. Tree length distribution skewness: an indicator of phylogenetic information. Systematic Zoology 41: 17-48.
46. _, D. M. HILLIS & R. JONES. 1996. Parametric boot-strapping in molecular phylogenetics: Applications and performance, pp. 19-45. In J. Ferraris & S. Palumbi (eds.), Molecular Zoology: Strategies and Protocols. Wiley-Liss, NY.
47. KISHINO, H. & M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary branching order in Hominoidae. Journal of Molecular Evolution 29: 170-179.
48. LA FARGE-ENGLAND, C. 1996. Growth form, branching pattern and perichaetial position in mosses: cladocarpy and pleurocarpy redefined. The Bryologist 99: 170-186.
49. LEWIS L. A., B. D. MISHLER & R. VILGALYS. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the liverworts (Hepaticae), a basal embryophyte lineage, inferred from nucleotide sequence data of the chloroplast gene rbcL. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7: 377-393.
50. MADDISON, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiply islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
51. MADDISON, W. P. & D. R. MADDISON. 1999. MacClade. Version 3.08a. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
52. MISHLER, B. & E. DE LUNA. 1991. The use of ontogenetic data in the phylogenetic analysis of mosses. Advances in Bryology 4: 121-167.
53. NADOT, S., R. BAJON & B LEJEUNE. 1994. The chloroplast gene rps4, as a tool for the study of Poaceae phylogeny. Plant Systematics and Evolution 191: 27-38.
54. NEWTON, A. E. & E. DE LUNA. 1999. A survey of morphological characters for phylogenetic study of the transition to pleurocarpy. THE BRYOLOGIST 102: 651-682.
55. _, C. J. COX, J. G. DUCKETT, J. WHEELER, B. GOFFINET, T. A. J. HEDDERSON & B. D. MISHLER. 2000. Evolution of the major moss lineages: phylogenetic analyses based on multiple gene sequences and morphology. THE BRYOLOGIST 103: 187-211.
56. PHILIBERT, H. 1888. Etudes sur le péristome. Revue Bryologique et Lichénologique 15: 37-44, 50-56.
57. REIMERS, H. 1954. Bryophyta. Moose, pp. 218-268. In H. Melchior & E. Werdermann (eds.), A. Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Gebrüder Borntraegger, Berlin.
58. ROGERS, S. O. & A. J. BENDICH. 1994. Extraction of total cellular DNA from plants, algae and fungi, sect. D1, pp. 1-8. In S. B. Gelvin & R. A. Schilperoort (eds.), Plant Molecular Biology Manual. Klewer Academic Publishers, London.
59. SAINSBURY, G. O. K. 1955. Handbook of the New Zealand mosses. Bulletin of the Royal Society of New Zealand 5: 1-490.
60. SAMIGULLIN, T. H., K. M. VALIEJO-ROMAN, A. V. TROITSKY, V. K. BOBROVA, V. R. FILIN, W. MARTIN & A. S. ANTONOV. 1998. Sequences of rDNA internal transcribed spacers from the chloroplast of 26 bryophytes: properties and phylogenetic utility. Federation of European Biochemical Societies, Letters 422: 47-51.
61. SHAW, J., L. E. ANDERSON & B. D. MISHLER. 1987. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. I. Diphyscium foliosum (Buxbaumiaceae). Memoirs of the New York Botanic Garden 45: 55-70.
62. _, _ & _. 1989. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. III. Funaria hygrometrica, Bryum pseudocapillare, and B. bicolor. Systematic Botany 14: 24-36.
63. _ & J. R. ROHRER. 1984. Endostomial architecture in diplolepideous mosses. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 57: 41-61.
64. SMITH, A. J. E. 1978. The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
65. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1999. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
66. _, G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL & D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference, pp. 407-514. In D. M. Hillis, C. B. Moritz & K. Mable (eds.), Molecular Systematics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
67. TABERLET, P., L. GIELLY, G. PAUTOU & J. BOUVET. 1991. Universal primers for the amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
68. TAYLOR, E. C. 1962. The Philibert peristome articles. An abridged translation. The Bryologist 65: 175-212.
69. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to humans and apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
70. VITT, D. H. 1982. Sphagnopsida and Bryopsida, pp. 305, 307-336. In S. P. Parker (ed.), Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms, Vol. 1. McGraw-Hill, NY.
71. _. 1984. The classification of the Bryopsida, pp. 676-759. In R. M. Schuster (ed.), New Manual of Bryology. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan, Japan.
72. _, B. GOFFINET & T. A. J. HEDDERSON. 1998. Ordinal level classification of the mosses: questions and answers for the 1990's, pp. 113-123. In J. W. Bates, N. W. Ashton & J. G. Duckett (eds.), Bryology for the Twenty-First Century. Maney Publishing and British Bryological Society, Leeds, U.K.
73. WHITTEMORE, A. & B. ALLEN. 1989. The systematic position of Adelothecium Mitt, and the familial classification of the Hookeriales (Musci). THE BRYOLOGIST 92: 261-272.
74. WITHEY, A. 1996. Systematic studies of the Spiridenatceae (Musci). PhD Dissertation, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.