A cladistic overview of the Bryaceae (Musci) based on morphological and anatomical data and with emphasis on the genus Bryum

Journal of Bryology

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 193-206

  Pedersen, Niklas ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bryoideae; Characters; Cladistic analysis; Mielichhoferioideae; Phylogeny; Pohlioideae

Indexed keywords

BRYACEAE; BRYOIDEAE; BRYOPHYTA; BRYUM; FUNARIA HYGROMETRICA; LEPTOBRYUM PYRIFORME; LINGULATA; MIELICHHOFERIA MIELICHHOFERIANA; MNIUM HORNUM; OSCULATIA; POHLIA CRUDA; POHLIA DRUMMONDII; RHODOBRYUM GIGANTEUM; SCHIZYMENIUM; TAYLORIA LINGULATA;

EID: 0002983175     PISSN: 03736687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/jbr.2000.22.3.193     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andrews AL. 1935. Bryaceae, pp. 184-242. In Grout AJ, ed. Moss flora of North America North of Mexico. Vol. 2. Newfane.
2. Bizot M. 1969. Mousses des iles du Cap Vert. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 63: 441-454.
3. Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstructions. Evolution 42: 795-803.
4. Brotherus VF. 1925. Musci (Laubmoose). 2. Hälfte. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Leipzig.
5. Chopra RS. 1975. Taxonomy of Indian mosses. Botanical Monograph 10:i-xL, 1-631.
6. Cox CJ, Hedderson TAJ. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among the ciliate arthrodontous mosses: evidence from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 215: 119-139.
7. Crum H. 1967. Studies in North American Bryaceae I-II. Bryologist 70: 170-110.
8. Eriksson T. 1998. AutoDecay. Version 4.0.1. (Hypercardstack distributed by the author). Stockholm: Botaniska Institutionen, Stockholm University.
9. Fleischer M. 1900-1922. Die Musci der Flora von Buitenzorg. Band 1-4. Leiden.
10. Fritsch R. 1991. Index to bryophyte chromosome counts. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 40: 1-352.
11. Gangulee HC. 1974. Mosses of eastern India and adjacent regions. Fasc. 4. Calcutta.
12. Hedenäs L. 1994. The basal pleurocarpous diplolepidous mosses - a cladistic approach. Bryologist 97: 225-243.
13. Hedenäs L. 1995. Higher taxonomic level relationships among diplolepidous pleurocarpous mosses - a cladistic overview. Journal of Bryology 18: 723-781.
14. Hedenäs L. 1996a. A cladistic evaluation of relationships between the Hookeriales, the Sematophyllaceae and some other taxa. Lindbergia 21: 49-82.
15. Hedenäs L. 1996b. A cladistic overview of the "Hookeriales". Lindbergia 21: 107-143.
16. Hedenäs L. 1998. Cladistic studies on pleurocarpous mosses: Research needs and use of results. In: Bates JW, Ashton NW, Duckett JG. eds. Bryology for the twenty-first century. Leeds: W. S. Maney & Son and British Bryological Society, 125-141.
17. Hedenäs L. 1997. An evaluation of phylogenetic relationships among the Thuidiaceae, the Amblystegiaceae, and the temperate members of the Hypnaceae. Lindbergia 22: 101-133.
18. Ignatov MS, Tan BT. 1992. Orthodontopsis, a new genus of Bryaceae (Musci) from southern Siberia, USSR. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 71: 165-173.
19. Koponen T. 1988. The phylogeny and classification of Mniaceae and Rhizogoniaceae (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 64: 37-46
20. Müller C. 1849. Synopsis Muscorum Frondosorum, Pars Prima. Berolini.
21. Nyholm E. 1993. Illustrated flora of Nordic mosses. Fasc. 3. Copenhagen and Lund: Nordic Bryological Society.
22. Ochi H. 1959. A revision of the Bryaceae in Japan and the adjacent regions. Tottori: Biological Institute, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Tottori University.
23. Rooy J van, Magill RE. 1987. Bryaceae. In: Magill RE, ed. Flora of Southern Africa, Part 1, Fascicle 2. Pretoria: Botanical Research Institute, 335-393.
24. Sanderson MJ, Donoghue MJ. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43: 1781-1795.
25. Sharp AJ, Crum H, Eckel PM. 1994. The moss flora of Mexico. Memoirs of the New York Botanical garden 69(2): i-vii, 581-1113, I-XVII.
26. Shaw J. 1985. The correlation between taxonomy and peristome structure in the Bryaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory. 59: 79-100.
27. Shaw J, Fife AJ. 1984. The evolutionary and taxonomic significance of peristome morphology in Anomobryum (Bryaceae, Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 57: 285-298.
28. Siddall ME, Kluge AG. 1997. Probabilism and phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 13: 313-336.
29. Smith AJE. 1978. The moss flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Spence JR. 1987. A proposed reclassification of Bryum, Anomobryum and Brachymenium (Musci, Bryaceae). Journal of Bryology 14: 659-676.
31. Swofford DL. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.
32. Vitt DH. 1984. Classification of the Bryopsida. In: Schuster RM. ed. New manual of bryology, Vol. 2. Nichinan: Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 696-759.
33. Walther K. 1983. Bryophytina,. Laubmosse. In: Gerloff J, Poelt J, eds. A Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 13. Berlin & Stuttgart: Gebrüder Borntraeger.
34. Zander R. 1993. Genera of the Pottiaceae: mosses of harsh environments. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Science 32: i-vi, 1-378.