Electron transfer reactions of C-shaped molecules in alkylated aromatic solvents: Evidence that the effective electronic coupling magnitude is temperature-dependent

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 106, Issue 18, 2002, Pages 4784-4793

  Napper, Andrew M ^a   Read, Ian ^a   Waldeck, David H ^a   Kaplan, Ruth W ^b   Zimmt, Matthew B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALKYLATED AROMATIC SOLVENTS; CHARGE RECOMBINATION RATE CONSTANTS; CHARGE SEPARATION RATE CONSTANTS; DIISOPROPYLBENZENE; DONOR BRIDGE ACCEPTOR MOLECULE; ELECTRON TRANSFER REACTIONS; ELECTRONIC COUPLING; REACTION FREE ENERGY;

BENZENE; ELECTRON TRANSPORT PROPERTIES; FREE ENERGY; MOLECULES; RATE CONSTANTS; THERMAL EFFECTS;

ORGANIC SOLVENTS;

EID: 0037046718     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp0204455     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. (a) Gould, I. R.; Young, R. H.; Moody, R. E.; Farid, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 2068.
2. (b) Gould, I. R.; Young, R. H.; Mueller, L. J.; Albrecht, A. C.; Farid, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8188.
3. (a) Winkler, J. R.; Di Bilio, A. J.; Farrow, N. A.; Richards, J. H.; Gray, H. B. Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 1753.
4. (b) Casimiro, D. R.; Beratan, D. N.; Onuchic, J. N.; Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1995, 246, 471.
5. (c) Miller, J. R.; Beitz, J. V.; Huddleston, R. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 5057.
6. (a) Hush, N. S. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1985, 64, 135.
7. (b) Oliver, A. M.; Paddon-Row, M. N.; Kroon, J.; Verhoeven, J. W. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992, 191, 371.
8. Morais, J.; Hung, R. R.; Grabowski, J. J.; Zimmt, M. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 13138.
9. Bixon, M.; Jortner, J.; Verhoeven, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7349.
10. (a) Closs, G. L.; Miller, J. R. Science 1988, 240, 440.
11. (b) Paddon-Row, M. N. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 18.
12. (c) Sachs, S. B.; Dudek, S. P.; Hsung, R. P.; Sita, L. R.; Smalley, J. F.; Newton, M. D.; Feldberg, S. W.; Chidsey, C. E. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10563.
13. (d) Winkker, J. R.; Gray, H. B. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 2, 399.
14. (e) Lewis, F. D.; Letsinger, R. L. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 3, 215.
15. (f) Davis, W. B.; Svec, W. A.; Ratner, M. A.; Wasielewski, M. R. Nature 1998, 396, 60.
16. (a) Chohan, K. K.; Jones, M.; Grossmann, J. G.; Frerman, F. E.; Scrutton, N. S.; Sutcliffe, M. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 34142.
17. (b) Jones, G. A.; Carpenter, B. K.; Paddon-Row, M. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11171.
18. (c) Xie, Q.; Archontis, G.; Skourtis, S. S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 312, 237.
19. (d) Balabin, I. A.; Onuchic, J. N. Science 2000, 290, 114.
20. (e) Cave, R. J.; Newton, M. D.; Kumar, K.; Zimmt, M. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 17501.
21. (f) Castner, E. W., Jr.; Kennedy, D.; Cave, R. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 2869.
22. (a) Davis, W. B.; Ratner, M. A.; Wasielewski, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7877.
23. (b) Graige, M. S.; Feher, G.; Okamura, M. Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 11679.
24. (c) Hoffman, B. M.; Ratner, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6237.
25. (d) Intermolecular electron-transfer reactions are influenced by the dependence of electronic coupling on donor-acceptor separation and the nature of the intervening medium. See ref 5f.
26. CS) of Table 1 for 1 in ref 5e.
27. (a) Lawson, J. M.; Paddon-Row, M. N.; Schuddeboom, W.; Warman, J. M.; Clayton, A. H. A.; Ghiggino, K. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 13099.
28. (b) Kumar, K.; Lin, Z.; Waldeck, D. H.; Zimmt, M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 243.
29. (c) Read, I.; Napper, A.; Kaplan, R.; Zimmt, M. B.; Waldeck, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10976.
30. (d) Lokan, N. R.; Paddon-Row, M. N.; Koeberg, M.; Verhoeven, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5075.
31. (e) Kaplan, R. W.; Napper, A. M.; Waldeck, D. H.; Zimmt, M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12039.
32. The following citation describes the pressure dependence of electronic orbital overlap in hydrogen bonds: Li, H.; Yamada, H.; Akasaka, K.i; Gronenborn, A. M. J. Biomol. NMR 2000, 18, 207.
33. Read, I.; Napper, A.; Zimmt, M. B.; Waldeck, D. H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 9385.
34. Napper, A. M.; Read, I.; Kaplan, R.; Zimmt, M. B.; Waldeck, D. H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106 in press.
35. rec, comprises two distinct electron-transfer processes; conversion of the CT state to the molecule's ground singlet state and to the molecule's lowest energy triplet state. This is of no consequence to the current investigation.
36. (a) Kumar, K.; Tepper, R. J.; Zeng, Y.; Zimmt, M. B. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 4051.
37. Kaplan, R. Ph.D. Thesis, Brown University, Providence, RI, 2001.
38. (a) Zeglinski, D. M.; Waldeck, D. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 692.
39. (b) O'Connor, D. V.; Phillips, D. Time Correlated Single Photon Counting; Academic Press: New York, 1984.
40. f.
41. -1. The temperature is in units of K.
42. Jortner, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1976, 64, 4860.
43. (a) Zeng, Y.; Zimmt, M. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 8395.
44. (b) Kumar, K.; Kurnikov, I.; Beratan, D.; Waldeck, D.; Zimmt, M. B. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 5529.
45. (a) Vath, P.; Zimmt, M. B.; Matyushov, D. V.; Voth, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 9130.
46. (b) Vath, P.; Zimmt, M. B. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 2626.
47. (c) Derr, D. L.; Elliott, C. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103 7888.
48. (d) Matyushov, D. V. Chem. Phys. 1993, 174, 199.
49. (e) Cortés, J.; Heitele, H.; Jortner, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 2527.
50. S with decreasing temperature for bacterial reaction centers is presented in Ortega, J. M.; Mathis, P.; Williams, J. C.; Allen, J. P. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 3354.
51. Matyushov, D. V.; Voth, G. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 3630.
52. The only other fitting parameter in these analyses was |V|, which was assume to be temperature-independent.
53. S(T) plots are evident.
54. The predicted values in column 3 of Table 1 are larger than previously reported in ref 10. A numerical error in a subroutine was responsible. The results of the corrected code have been checked with code kindly provided by Professor Matyushov.
55. -1.
56. Compound 2 in the current manuscript is the same as compound 8 in reference 18a.
57. 26b After correcting for the frequency dependence of the transition moment, the Franck-Condon line shape remains. The energy of corresponding to the maximum of this line shape is reported in the text.
58. (b) Marcus, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 3078.
59. S obtained by fitting the CT emission line shape.
60. 1 → CT).
61. 1 → CT) values presented for 1 and 2.
62. 26c
63. Ulstrup, J.; Jortner, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 63, 4358.
64. S. This demonstrates that electronic coupling magnitudes extracted from rate constant data in the Marcus normal region depend weakly on the model used to simulate the vibrational Franck-Condon factors. For further discussion of the influence of zero, and multi quantum mode models on Franck-Condon factors and extracted values of the electronic coupling, see refs 18b and 32d.
65. (a) Hupp, J. T.; Williams, R. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 808.
66. (b) Hogiu, S.; Dreyer, J.; Pfeiffer, M.; Brzezinka, K.-W.; Werncke, W. J. Raman. Spectrosc. 2000, 31, 797.
67. (c) Codbout, J. T.; Zuilhof, H.; Heim, G.; Gould, I. R.; Goodman, J. L.; Dinnocenzo, J. P.; Kelley, A. M. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2000, 31, 233.
68. (d) Lilichenko, M.; Tittelbach-Helmrich, D.; Verhoeven, J. W.; Gould, I. R.; Myers, A. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 10958.
69. S, the agreement between the molecular model predictio and the experimental results (Table 1) is fortuitous and suggests that the parametrization of the molecular model overestimates the extra-cavity solvation of 1.
70. (a) Sharp, K.; Honig, B. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 19, 301.
71. (b) Sitkoff, D.; Sharp, K. A.; Honig, B. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 1978.
72. (c) Zhang, L. Y.; Frieser, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 16479.
73. The finite-difference Poisson-Boltzman calculations indicate that exclusion of the solvent from the cleft of 1 reduces the solvent reorganization energy by less than 10%. See ref 18b.
74. The value of |V(295 K)| provided for 1,3,5-tri-isopropylbenzene is a linear extrapolation of the results obtained at lower temperatures.
75. -A, has the "transferring" electron localized on the aromatic ring.
76. 38b between the anthracene, and the alkene diester generate a negative enthalpy change for sol entry. Solvent "complexation" with 1 results in a reduction of translational entropy relative to two, independently diffusing molecules.
77. (b) Tsuzuki, S.; Honda, K.; Uchimaru, T.; Mikami, M.; Tanabe, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 104.
78. According to the best fit analysis, approximately 10% of the charge recombination products are formed with one quantum of vibrational energy when temperature reaches 360 K.
79. (a) Smitha, M. A.; Prasad, E.; Gopidas, K. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1159
80. Prasad, E.; Gopidas, K.R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3191.
81. (a) Segal, D. A.; Nitzan, A.; Davis, W. B.; Wasielewski, M. R.; Ratner, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 3817.
82. (b) Ashkenazi, G.; Kosloff, R.; Ratner, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3386.
83. (c) Tang, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 6263.