Functional magnetic resonance of human breast tumors: Diffusion and perfusion imaging

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 980, Issue , 2002, Pages 95-115

  Sinha, Shantanu ^a   Sinha, Usha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast tumors; Diffusion MRI; Perfusion MRI

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VOLUME; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CELL DENSITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; MICROVASCULATURE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TISSUE PERFUSION; TUMOR BLOOD FLOW;

EID: 0036975431     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04891.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. KACL, G.M., et al. 1998. Detection of breast cancer with conventional mammography and contrast enhanced MR imaging. Eur. Radiol. 8: 194-200.
2. HEYWANG-KOBRUNNER, S.H. & R. BECK. 1995. Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast, 2nd edit. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelburg, New York.
3. RANKIN, S.C. 2000. MRI of the breast. Br. J. Radiol. 73: 806-818.
4. BUADU, L.D., et al. 1996. Breast lesions; correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogensis. Radiology 200: 639-649.
5. STOMPER, P.C., et al. 1997. Angiogenesis and dynamic MR imaging gadoliniurn enhancement of malignant and benign breast lesions. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 45: 39-46.
6. BONE, B., et al. 1998. Mechanism of contrast enhancement in breast lesions at MR imaging. Acta. Radiol. 39: 494-500.
7. MUSSURKIS, S., et al. 1997. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumors. Clin. Radiol. 52: 516-526.
8. NUNES, L.W., et al. 1997. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 202: 833-841.
9. SINHA, S., et al. 1997. Multifeature Analysis of Gd-enhanced MR images of breast lesions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 7: 1016-1026.
10. IKEDA, D.M., et al. 2001. Development, standardization and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13: 889-895.
11. KINKEL, K. 2001. Challenges to interpretation of breast MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13: 821-829.
12. GILLES, R., et al. 1995. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-hisopathologic correlation. Radiology 196: 415-419.
13. OREL, G. 1994. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 190: 485-493.
14. HOCHMAN, M.G., et al. 1997. Fibroadenomas: MR imaging appearances with radiologic histopathologic correlation. Radiology 204: 123-129.
15. DVORAK, H.F., et al. 1988. Identification and chracterization of the blood vessels of solid tumors that are leaky to circulating macromolecules. Am. J. Pathol. 133: 95-109.
16. DVORAK, H.F., et al. 1995. Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor, microvascular hyperpermeability, and angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 146: 1029-1039.
17. MOSELEY, M.E., et al. 1991. MRI of diffusion and perfusion. Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 3: 50-78.
18. BARBIER, E.L. 2001. Methodology of brain perfusion imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13: 496-520.
19. DETRE, J.A., et al. 1994. Tissue specific perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling. NMR Biomed. 7: 75-82.
20. LEBIHAN, D., et al. 1992. Diffusion MR imaging: clinical applications. Am. J. Roent. 159: 591-599.
21. DUCATMAN, B.S., et al. 1993. Correlation of histologic grade of breast carcinoma with cytologic features on fine-needle aspiration of the breast. Mod. Pathol. 6: 539-543.
22. LE BIHAN, D., et al. 2001. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and application. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13: 534-546.
23. LE BIHAN, D., et al. 2001. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and application. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13: 534-546.
24. SUGAHARA, T., et al. 1999. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 9: 53-60.
25. LE BIHAN, D. & P.J. BASSER. 1995. Molecular diffusion and nuclear magnetic resonance. In Diffusion and Perfusion magnetic Resonance Imaging: Applications to Fuctional MRI. D. Le Bihan, Ed.: 5-19. Raven Press, New York.
26. CHENEVERT, T.L., et al. 1990. Anisotropic diffusion within human white matter: demonstration with NMR techniques in vivo. Radiology 177: 401-405.
27. GUPTA, R.K., et al. 1999. Inverse correlation between the choline magnetic resonance spectroscopy signal intensity and the apparent diffusion coefficient in human glioma. Magn. Reson. Med. 41: 2-7.
28. HAACKE, E.M., et al. 1999. Introductory signal acquisition methods: free induction decay, spin echoes, inversion recovery and spectroscopy. In Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design, Chapter 8. 111-134. Wiley-Liss, New York.
29. LE BIHAN, D., et al. 1992. Diffusion MR imaging: clinical applications, Am. J. Roentgenol. 159: 591-599.
30. HAACKE, E.M., et al. 1999. Segmented k-space and echo planar imaging. In Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design, Chapter 19. 513-563. Wiley-Liss, New York.
31. LIANG, Z. & P.C. LAUTERBUR. 2000. Principles of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. A Signal Processing Perspective, Chapter 9. 291-315. Wiley-IEEE Press.
32. MAIER, C.F., et al. 1997. Quantitative diffusion imaging in implanted human breast tumors. Magn. Reson. Med. 37: 576-581.
33. GALONS, J.P., et al. 1999. Early increases in breast tumor xenograft mobility in response to paclitaxel therapy detected by non-invasive diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Neoplasia 1: 113-117.
34. CHINNAIYAN, A.M., et al. 2000. Combined effect of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand and ionizing radiation in breast cancer therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 1754-1759.
35. ENGLANDER, S., et al. 1997. Diffusion imaging of the human breast. NMR in BioMedicine 10: 348-352.
36. PATRIDGE, S.C., et al. 2001. Menstrual cycle variation of apparent diffusion coefficients measured in the normal breast using MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 14: 433-438.
37. LUCAS-QUESADA, F.A., et al. 2000. Apparent diffusion coefficient - an additional feature to increase specificity in the classification of breast lesions. Proceedings of the 8th Intl. Soc. Mag. Res. Med., Denver.
38. SINHA, S., et al. 2000. Use of apparent diffusion coefficient to enhance the specificity of MR imaging of breast lesions. Eur. Radiol. 10: F43-F44.
39. SINHA, S., et al. 2002. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 15: 693-704.
40. CONTURO, T.E., et al. 1996. Encoding of anisotropic diffusion with tetrahedral gradients: a general mathematical diffusion formalism and experimental results. Magn. Reson. Med. 35: 399-412.
41. GUO, Y., et al. 2001. Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with histologic cellularity in breast tumors (Abstr.). Proc. Intl. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 9: 2326. Glasgow, Scotland.
42. MORVAN, D. 1995. In vivo measurement of diffusion and pseudo-perfasion in skeletal muscle at rest and after exercise. Magn. Reson. Imag. 13: 193-199.
43. MELHEM, E.R., et al. 2000. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain: effect of diffusion weighting on trace and anisotropy measurements. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 21: 1813-1820.
44. PILATUS, U., et al. Intracellular volume and apparent diffusion constants of perfused cancer cell cultures, as measured by NMR. Magn. Reson. Med. 37: 825-832.
45. OKAMOTO, K., et al. 2000. Diffusion weighted echo-planar MR imaging in differential diagnosis of brain tumors and tumor-like conditions. Eur. Radiol. 10: 1342-1350.
46. CHA, S., et al. 2002. Intracranial mass lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted echo-planar perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 223: 11-29.
47. TOFTS, P.S. 1997. Modeling tracer knetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 7: 91-101.
48. ROBERTS, H.C., et al. 2000. Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 21: 891-899.
49. KUHL, C.K., et al. 1997. Breast neoplasms: T2* susceptibility-contrast, first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 202: 87-95.
50. KVISTAD, K.A. 2000. Breast Lesions: Evaluation with dynamic contrast enhanced TI-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion imaging. Radiology 216: 545-553.
51. DELILLE, J., et al. 2002. Breast cancer: regional blood flow and blood volume measured with magnetic susceptibility-based MR imaging-initial results. Radiology 223: 558-565.