Comparative genomic hybridization: Practical guidelines

Diagnostic Molecular Pathology

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 193-203

  Jeuken, Judith W M ^a   Sprenger, Sandra H E ^a   Wesseling, Pieter ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

CGH Manual; Comparative genomic hybridization; Guideline; Review; Troubleshooting

Indexed keywords

DNA; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE; PRIMER DNA;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL LABELING; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME NUMBER; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CYTOGENETICS; DNA DENATURATION; DNA HYBRIDIZATION; DNA ISOLATION; DNA PROBE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; METAPHASE CHROMOSOME; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY CONTROL; TECHNIQUE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION;

CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; DNA, NEOPLASM; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MICROSCOPY; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION;

EID: 0036891250     PISSN: 10529551     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00019606-200212000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, et al. Comparitive genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 1992;258:818-21.
2. Nacheva EP, Grace CD, Bittner M, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization: A comparison with molecular and cytogenetic analysis. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1998;100:93-105.
3. Cher ML, MacGrogan D, Bookstein R, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization, allelic imbalance, and fluorescence in situ hybridization on chromosome 8 in prostate cancer. Genes Chrom Cancer 1994;11:153-62.
4. Joos S, Bergerheim USR, Pan Y, et al. Mapping of chromosomal gains and losses in prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chrom Cancer 1995;14:267-76.
5. Kallioniemi OP, Kallioniemi A, Piper J, et al. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors. Genes Chrom Cancer 1994;10:231-43.
6. Knuutila S, Armengol G, Bjorkqvist AM, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization study on pooled DNAs from tumors of clinical-pathological entity. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1998;100:25-30.
7. Piper J, Rutovitz D, Sudar D, et al. Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 1995;10-26.
8. Bentz M, Plesch A, Stilgenbauer S, et al. Minimal sizes of deletions detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chrom Cancer 1998;21:172-5.
9. Kirchhoff M, Gerdes T, Maahr J, et al. Deletions below 10 megabsepairs are detected in comparative genomic hbridization by standard reference intervals. Genes Chrom Cancer 1999;25:410-13.
10. Parente F, Gaudray P, Carle GF, et al. Experimental assessment of the detection limit of genomic amplification by comparative genomic hybridization CGH. Cytogen Cell Gen 1997;78:65-8.
11. Gebhart E, Liehr T. Patterns of genomic imbalances in human solid tumors. Int J Oncol 2000;16:383-99.
12. James LA. Comparative genomic hybridization as a tool in tumour cytogenetics. J Pathol 1999;187:385-95.
13. Knuutila S, Aalto Y, Autio K, et al. DNA copy number losses in human neoplasms. Am J Pathol 1999;155:683-94.
14. Knuutila S, Autio K, Aalto Y. Online access to CGH data of DNA sequence copy number changes. Am J Pathol 2000;157:689.
15. Knuutila S, Bjorkqvist AM, Autio K, et al. DNA copy number amplifications in human neoplasms. Am J Pathol 1998;152:1107-23.
16. Hermsen MA, Meijer GA, Baak JPA, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization: A new tool in cancer pathology. Hum Pathol 1996;27:342-9.
17. Wiltshire RN, Rasheed BKA, Friedman HS. et al. Comparative genetic patterns of glioblastoma multiforme: Potential diagnostic tool for tumor classification. Neuro-Oncology 2000;2:164-73.
18. Jeuken JWM, Sprenger SHE, Wesseling P, et al. Identification of subgroups of high-grade oligodendroglial tumors by comparative genomic hybridization. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1999;58:606-12.
19. Huhn SL, Mohapatra G, Bollen A, et al. Chromosomal imbalances in glioblastoma multiforme by comparative genomic hybridization: Correlation with radiation treatment. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:1435-43.
20. Barrett IJ. Lomax BL, Loukianova T, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization: A new tool for reproductive pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001;125:81-4.
21. Bryndorf T, Kirchhoff M, Rose H, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization in clinical cytogenetics. Am J Hum Genes 1995;57:1211-20.
22. Alers JC, Rochat J, Krijtenburg P, et al. Universal linkage system: An improved method for labeling archival DNA for comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chrom Cancer 1999;25:301-5.
23. El-Rafai W, Larramendy ML, Bjorkqvist AM, et al. Optimizing of comparative genomic hybridization using fluorocrome conjugated to dCTP and dUTP nucteotides. Lab Invest 1997;77:699-700.
24. Hirose Y, Aldape KD, Takahashi MA, et al. Tissue microdissection and degenerate oligonucleotide primed-polymerase. J Mol Diagn 2001;3:62-7.
25. Huang Q, Schantz SP, Roa PH, et al. Improving degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR-comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA copy number changes in tumors. Genes Chrom Cancer 2000;28:395-403.
26. Karhu R, Kahkonen M, Kuukasjarvi T, et al. Quality control of CGH: Impact of metaphase chromosomes and the dynamic range of hybridization. Cytometry 1997;28:198-205.
27. Kuukasjarvi T, Tanner M, Pennanen S, et al. Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chrom Cancer 1997;18:94-101.
28. Forozan F, Karhu R, Kononen J, et al. Genomic screening by comparative genomic hybridization. Trends Genet 1997;13:405-9.
29. Houlldsworth J, Chagnatti RSK. Comparative genomic hybridization: An overview. Am J Pathol 1994;145:1253-60.
30. Weiss MM, Hermsen MA, Meijer GA, et al. Comparative genomic hybridisation. Mol Pathol 1999;52:243-51.
31. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polsky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acid Res 1988;16:1215.
32. du Manoir S, Kallioniemi OP, Lichter P, et al. Hardware and software requirements for quantitative analysis of comparitive genomic hybridization. Cytometry 1995;19:4-9.
33. du Manoir S, Schrock E, Bentz M, et al. Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 1995;19:27-41.
34. du Manoir S, Speicher MR, Joos S, et al. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 1993;90:590-610.
35. Isola J, De Vries S, Chu L, et al. Analysis of changes in DNA sequence copy number by comparitive genomic hybridization in archival paraffin-embedded tumor samples. Am J Pathol 1994;145:1301-8.
36. Jeuken JWM, Nelen MR, Vermeer H, et al. PTEN mutation analysis in two genetic subtypes of high-grade oligodendroglial tumors: PTEN is only occasionally mutated in one of the two genetic subtypes. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2000;119:42-7.
37. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Piper J, et al. Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparitive genomic hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994;91:2156-60.
38. Henegariu O, Heerema NA, Lowe-Wright L, et al. Improvements in cytogenetic slide preparation: Controlled chromosome spreading, chemical aging and gradual denaturing. Cytometry 2001;43:101-9.
39. Barth TFE, Benner A, Bentz M, et al. Risk of false positive results in comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chrom Cancer 2000;28:353-7.
40. Kirchhoff M, Gerdes T, Rose H, et al. Detection of chromosomal gains and losses in comparative genomic hybridization analysis based on standard reference intervals. Cytometry 1998;31:163-73.