Detection of chromosomal gains and losses in Comparative Genomic Hybridization analysis based on standard reference intervals

Cytometry

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 163-173

  Kirchhoff, Maria ^a,b   Gerdes, Tommy ^a   Rose, Hanne ^a   Maahr, Jan ^a   Ottesen, Anne Marie ^a   Lundsteen, Claes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

Author keywords

CGH; Comparative genomic hybridization; Detection criteria; Quantitative image analysis; T statistic

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME LOSS; DNA LIBRARY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYBRIDIZATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; METAPHASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; TELOMERE;

CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; DNA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; KARYOTYPING; MALE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0032032471     PISSN: 01964763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980301)31:3<163::AID-CYTO3>3.0.CO;2-M     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bryndorf T, Kirchhoff M, Rose H, Maahr J, Gerdes T, Karhu R, Kallioniemi A, Christensen B, Lundsteen C, Philip J: Comparative genomic hybridization in clinical cytogenetics. Am J Hum Genet 57:1211-1220, 1995.
2. Cher ML, Bova GS, Moore DH, Small EJ, Carroll PR, Pin SS, Epstein JI, Isaacs WB, Jensen RH: Genetic alterations in untreated metastases and androgen-independent prostate cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization and allotyping. Cancer Res 56:3091-3102, 1996.
3. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, Rutovitz D, Gray JW, Waldman F, Pinkel D: Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 258:818-882, 1992.
4. Kallioniemi OP, Kallioniemi A, Piper J, Isola J, Waldman FM, Gray JW, Pinkel D: Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors Genes Chromosom Cancer 10:231-243, 1994.
5. Karhu R, Kähkönen M, Kuukasjärvi T, Pennanen S, Tirkkonen M, Kallioniemi O: Quality control of CGH: impact of metaphase chromosomes and the dynamic range of hybridization. Cytometry 28:198-205, 1997.
6. Kirchhoff M, Gerdes T, Maahr J, Rose H, Lundsteen C: Automatic correction of the interfering effect of unsuppressed interspersed repetitive sequences in comparative genomic hybridization analysis. Cytometry 28:130-134, 1997.
7. Lundsteen C, Maahr J, Christensen B, Bryndorf T, Bentz M, Lichter P, Gerdes T: Image analysis in comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 19:42-50, 1995.
8. du Manoir S, Schröck E, Bentz M, Speicher MR, Joos S, Ried T, Lichter P, Lichter P, Cremer T: Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 19:27-41, 1995.
9. du Manoir S, Speicher MR, Joos S, Schröck E, Popp S, Döhner H, Kovacs G, Kovacs G, Robert-Nicoud M, Lichter P, Cremer T: Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 90:590-610, 1993.
10. Moore DH, Pallavicini M, Cher ML, Gray JW: A t-statistic for objective interpretation of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) profiles. Cytometry 28:183-190, 1997.
11. Piper J, Rutovitz D, Sudar D, Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Waldman FM, Gray JW, Pinkel D: Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 19:10-26, 1995.
12. Yu L-C, Moore DH, Magrane G, Cronin J, Pinkel D, Lebo RV, Gray JW: Objective aneuploidy detection for fetal and neonatal screening using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Cytometry 28:191-197, 1997.