Universal Linkage System: An improved method for labeling archival DNA for comparative genomic hybridization

Genes Chromosomes and Cancer

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 301-305

  Alers, Janneke C ^a,d   Rochat, Jenneke ^a   Krijtenburg, Pieter Jaap ^a   Van Dekken, Herman ^a   Raap, Anton K ^b   Rosenberg, Carla ^b,c  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d JOSEPHINE NEFKENS INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA FRAGMENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL LABELING; CHROMOSOME SIZE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA NICK TRANSLATION; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA STRUCTURE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLID TUMOR;

ARCHIVES; DNA, NEOPLASM; FEMALE; FIXATIVES; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION;

EID: 0032995439     PISSN: 10452257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199907)25:3<301::AID-GCC13>3.0.CO;2-1     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Alers JC, Krijtenburg P-J, Rosenberg C, Hop WCJ, Verkerk AM, Schröder FH, van der Kwast ThH, Bosman FT, van Dekken H. 1997. Interphase cytogenetics of prostatic tumor progression: specific chromosomal abnormalities are involved in metastasis to the bone. Lab Invest 77:437-448.
2. Forozan F, Karhu R, Kononen J, Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP. 1997. Genome screening by comparative genomic hybridization. Trends Genet 13:405-409.
3. Isola J. DeVries S, Chu L, Ghazvini S, Waldman F. 1994. Analysis of changes in DNA sequence copy number by comparative genomic hybridization in archival paraffin-embedded tumor samples. Am J Pathol 145:1301-1308.
4. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, Rurovitz D, Gray JW, Waldman F, Pinkel D. 1992. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 258:818-821.
5. Kallioniemi OP, Kallioniemi A, Piper J, Isola J, Waldman F, Gray JW, Pinkel D. 1994. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 10:231-243.
6. Kirchhoff M, Gerdes T, Rose H, Maahr J, Ottesen AM, Lundsteen C. 1998. Detection of chromosomal gains and losses in comparative genomic hybridization analysis based on standard reference intervals. Cytometry 31:163-173.
7. Knuutila S. Björkqvist AM, Autio K, Tarkkanen M, Wolf M, Monni O, Szymanska J, Larramendy ML, Tapper J, Pere H, El-Rifai W, Hemmer S, Wasenius VM, Vidgren V, Zhu Y. 1998. DNA copy number amplifications in human neoplasms: review of comparative genomic hybridization studies. Am J Pathol 152:1107-1123.
8. Larramendy ML, El-Rifai W, Knuutila S. 1998. Comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate-and texas red-conjugated nucleotides for direct labeling in comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 31:174-179.
9. Ried T, Just KE, Holtgreve-Grez, du Manoir S, Speicher MR, Schröck E, Latham C, Blegen H, Zetterberg A, Cremer T, Auer G. 1995. Comparative genomic hybridization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumors reveals different patterns of chromosomal gains and losses in fibroadenomas and diploid and aneuploid carcinomas. Cancer Res 55:5415-5423.
10. Telenius H, Carter NP, Bebb CE, Nordenskjöld M, Ponder BAJ, Tunnacliffe A. 1992. Degenerate oligonucleotide-primes PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer. Genomics 13:718-725.
11. Van Dekken H, Rosenberg C, Krijtenburg PJ, Alers JC. 1997. Interphase cytogenetics and comparative genomic hybridization of human epithelial cancers and precursor lesions. Histochem Cell Biol 108:419-130.