Quality control of CGH: Impact of metaphase chromosomes and the dynamic range of hybridization

Cytometry

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 198-205

  Karhu, Ritva ^a,c   Kähkönen, Marketta ^a   Kuukasjärvi, Tuula ^a   Pennanen, Sari ^a   Tirkkonen, Mika ^a   Kallioniemi, Olli ^b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Comparative genomic hybridization; Cytogenetics; Digital image analysis; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; G banding

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME; CYTOGENETICS; FLUORESCENCE; GENOME; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYBRIDIZATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; METAPHASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL;

CHROMOSOME BANDING; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 1; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 17; FEMALE; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MALE; METAPHASE; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; QUALITY CONTROL; X CHROMOSOME;

EID: 1842301686     PISSN: 01964763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19970701)28:3<198::AID-CYTO3>3.0.CO;2-A     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bentz M, Huck K, du Manoir S, Joos S, Werner CA, Fischer K, Dohner H, Lichter P: Comparative genomic hybridization in chronic B-cell leukemias shows a high incidence of chromosomal gains and losses. Blood 85:3610-3618, 1995.
2. Bryndorf T, Kirchhoff M, Rose H, Maahr J, Gerdes T, Karhu R, Kallioniemi A, Christensen B, Lundsteen C, Philip J: Comparative genomic hybridization in clinical cytogenetics. Am J Hum Genet 57:1211-1220, 1995.
3. du Manoir S, Kallioniemi O-P, Lichter P, Piper J, Benedetti PA, Carothers AD, Fantes JA, Garcia-Sagredo JM, Gerdes T, Giollant M, Hemery B, Isola J, Maahr J, Morrison H, Perry P, Stark M, Sudar D, van Vliet LJ, Verwoerd N, Vrolijk J: Hardware and software requirements for quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 19:4-9, 1995.
4. du Manoir S, Schrock E, Bentz M, Speicher MR, Joos S, Ried T, Lichter P, Cremer T: Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 19:27-41, 1995.
5. du Manoir, Speicher MR, Joos S, Schrock E, Popp S, Dohner H, Kovacs G, Robert Nicoud M, Lichter P, Cremer T: Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and lossses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 90:590-610, 1993.
6. Heselmeyer K, Schrock E, du Manoir S, Biegen H, Shah K, Steinbeck R, Auer G, Ried T: Gain of chromosome 3q defines the transition from severe dysplasia to invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:479-484, 1996.
7. Houldsworth J, Mathew S, Rao PH, Dyomina K, Louie DC, Parsa N, Offit K, Chaganti RS: REL proto-oncogene is frequently amplified in extranodal diffuse large cell lymphoma. Blood 87:25-29, 1996.
8. Hyytinen ER, Thalmann GN, Zhau HE, Karhu R, Kallioniemi O-P, Chung LW, Visakorpi T: Genetic changes associated with the acquisition of androgen-independent growth, tumorigenicity, and metastatic potential in a prostate cancer model. Br J Cancer 75:190-195, 1997.
9. Iwabuchi H, Sakamoto M, Sakunaga H, Ma YY, Carcangiu ML, Pinkel D, Yang Feng TL, Gray JW: Genetic analysis of benign, low-grade, and high-grade ovarian tumors. Cancer Res 55:6172-6180, 1995.
10. Jack EM, Harrison CJ, Allen TD, Harris R: The structural basis for C-banding: A scanning electron microscopy study. Chromosoma (Berl) 91:363-368, 1985.
11. Joos S, Bergerheim US, Pan Y, Matsuyama H, Bentz M, du Manoir S, Lichter P: Mapping of chromosomal gains and losses in prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosom Cancer 14:267-276, 1995.
12. Joos S, Otano Joos MI, Ziegler S, Bruderlein S, du Manoir S, Bentz M, Moller P, Lichter P: Primary mediastinal (thymlc) B-cell lymphoma is characterized by gains of chromosomal material including 9p and amplification of the REL gene. Blood 87:1571-1578, 1996.
13. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi O-P, Piper J, Tanner M, Stokke T, Chen L, Smith HS, Pinkel D, Gray JW, Waldman FM: Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:2156-2160, 1994.
14. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi O-P, Sudar D, Rutovitz D, Gray JW, Waldman F, Pinkel D: Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 258:818-821, 1992.
15. Kallioniemi O-P, Kallioniemi A, Piper J, Isola J, Waldman FM, Gray JW, Pinkel D: Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors. Genes Chromosom Cancer 10:231-243, 1994.
16. Kuukasjärvi T, Karhu R, Tanner M, Kähkönen M, Schäffer A, Nupponen N, Pennanen S, Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi O-P, Isola J: Genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution underlying development of asynchronous metastasis in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 57:1597-1604, 1997.
17. Lundsteen C, Maahr J, Christensen B, Bryndorf T, Bentz M, Lichter P, Gerdes T: Image analysis in comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 19:42-50, 1995.
18. Piper J, Rutovitz D, Sudar D, Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi O-P, Waldman FM, Gray JW, Pinkel D: Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 19:10-26, 1995.
19. Raap AK, Marijnen JG, Vrolijk J, van der Ploeg M: Denaturation, renaturation, and loss of DNA during in situ hybridization procedures. Cytometry 7:235-242, 1986.
20. Schröck E, Thiel G, Lozanova T, du Manoir S, Meffert MC, Jauch A, Speicher MR, Nurnberg P, Vogel S, Jänisch W, Donis-Keller H, Ried T, Witkowski R, Cremer T: Comparative genomic hybridization of human malignant gliomas reveals multiple amplification sites and nonrandom chromosomal gains and losses. Am J Pathol 144:1203-1218, 1994.
21. Seruca R, Suijkerbuijk RF, Gartner F, Criado B, Veiga I, Olde Weghuis D, David L, Castedo S, Sobrinho Simoes M: Increasing levels of MYC and MET co-amplification during tumor progression of a case of gastric cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 82:140-145, 1995.
22. Tanke HJ, Florijn RJ, Wiegant J, Raap AK, Vrolijk J: CCD microscopy and image analysis of cells and chromosomes stained by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Histochem J 27:4-14, 1995.
23. Tirkkonen M, Karhu R, Kallioniemi O, Isola J: Evaluation of camera requirements for comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 25:394-398, 1996.
24. Visakorpi T, Hyytinen E, Koivisto P, Tanner M, Keinanen R, Palmberg C, Palotie A, Tammela T, Isola J, Kallioniemi O-P: In vivo amplification of the androgen receptor gene and progression of human prostate cancer. Nat Genet 9:401-406, 1995.
25. Vrolijk J, Sloos W, Verwoerd, Tanke H: Applicability of a noncooled video-rated CCD camera for detection of fluorescence in situ hybridization signals. Cytometry 15:2-11, 1994.