Molecular data place Hydnoraceae with Aristolochiaceae

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 89, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 1809-1817

  Nickrent, Daniel L ^a   Blarer, Albert ^b   Qiu, Yin Long ^c   Soltis, Douglas E ^d   Soltis, Pamela S ^d   Zanis, Michael ^e  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

atpB; atpl; Hydnora; Lactoridaceae; matR; Prosopanche; rbcL; Ribosomal DNA

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; PHYLOGENETICS;

ARISTOLOCHIACEAE; EMBRYOPHYTA; HYDNORA; HYDNORACEAE; LACTORIDACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PIPERACEAE; PROSOPANCHE; RAFFLESIACEAE; SAURURACEAE;

EID: 0036861859     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.89.11.1809     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Agardh, C. A. 1821. (Hydnorinae), nom. cons. In Aphorismi Botanici, pp. 87-102. Literis Berlingianis, Lund, Germany.
2. Albach, D.. D. Soltis, M. Chase, and P. Soltis. 2001. Phylogenetic placement of the enigmatic angiosperm Hydrostachys. Taxon 50: 781-805.
3. APG. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531-553.
4. Baillon, H. E. 1886. Hydnoraceae Trib. Aristolochiacearum. Librairie Hachette, Paris, France.
5. Beccari, O. 1871. Descizione die due nuove specie d'Hydnora l'Abissinia. Nuovo Giornale Botanico Italiano 3: 6-7.
6. Brown, R. 1822. An account of a new genus of plants, named Rafflesia. Transactions of the Linnaean Society London 13: 201-234.
7. Brown, R. 1844. Description of the female flower and fruit of Rafflesia arnoldi, with remarks on its affinities; and an illustration of the structure of Hydnora africana. Transactions of the Linnaean Society of London 19: 221-238.
8. Chase, M. W., et al. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
9. Chodat, R. 1915. Les espèces du genre Prosopanche. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de Genève 7: 65-66.
10. Cocucci, A. E. 1965. Estudios en el género Prosopanche (Hydnoraceae) I. Revisión taxonómica. Kurtziana 2: 53-74.
11. Cocucci, A. E. 1975. Estudios en el género Prosopanche (Hydnoraceae) II. Organización de la flor. Kurtziana 8: 7-15.
12. Cocucci, A. E. 1976. Estudios en el género Prosopanche (Hydnoraceae) III. Embriología. Kurtziana 9: 19-39.
13. Cocucci, A. E., and A. A. Cocucci. 1996. Prosopanche (Hydnoraceae): Somatic and reproductive structures, biology, systematics, phylogeny and potentialities as a parasitic weed. In M. T. Moreno, J. I. Cubero, D. Berner, D. Joel, L. J. Musselman, and C. Parker [eds.], Advances in Parasitic Plant Research, 179-193. Junta de Andalucia, Dirección General de Investigación Agraria, Cordoba, Spain.
14. Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
15. Cronquist, A. 1988. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. New York Botanical Gardens, Bronx, New York, USA.
16. Dahlgren, R., and K. Bremer. 1985. Major clades of angiosperms. Cladistics 1: 349-368.
17. Dastur, R. H. 1921. Notes on the development of the ovule, embryosac, and embryo of Hydnora africana Thunb. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 10: 27-31.
18. De Bary, A. 1868. Prosopanche burmeisteri, eine neue Hydnoree aus Süd-Amerika. Abhandlungen der Naturforschende Gesellschaft zu Halle. 10: 243-272.
19. Decaisne, M. J. 1873. Note sur trois espèces d'Hydnora. Bulletin de Societie Botanique Francois 20: 75-77.
20. Doyle, J. A., and P. K. Endress. 2000. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: Comparison and combination with molecular data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Supplement 6): S121-S153.
21. Endress, P. K. 1994. Floral structure and evolution of primitive angiosperms: Recent advances. Plant Systematics and Evolution 192: 79-97.
22. Felsenstein, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 27: 401-410.
23. González, F., and P. Rudall. 2001. The questionable affinities of Lactoris: Evidence from branching pattern, inflorescence morphology, and stipule development. American Journal of Botany 88: 2143-2150.
24. Harms, H. 1935. Rafflesiaceae, Hydnoraceae, and Balanophoraceae. In A. Engler and H. Harms [eds.], Die Natürlichen Planzenfamilien, 243-281, 282-295, 296-339. Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig, Germany.
25. Hoot, S. B., S. Magallón, and P. R. Crane. 1999. Phylogeny of basal eudicots based on three molecular data sets: atpB, rbcL, and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 1-32.
26. Jumelle, H., and H. Perrier de la Bâthie. 1912. Quelques phanérogames parasites de Madagascar. Revue Générale de Botanique 24: 321-328.
27. Kelly, L. M. 1997. A cladistic analysis of Asarum (Aristolochiaceae) and implications for the evolution of herkogamy. American Journal of Botany 84: 1752-1765.
28. Kuzoff, R. K., J. A. Sweere, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and E. A. Zimmer. 1998. The phylogenetic potential of entire 26S rDNA sequences in plants. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 251-263.
29. Meyer, E. H. F. 1833. De Hydnora. Nova Acta Physico-Medica Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum 16: 765.
30. Musselman, L. J., and J. H. Visser. 1986. The strangest plant in the world! Veld and Flora 71: 109-111.
31. Musselman, L. J., and J. H. Visser. 1989. Taxonomy and natural history of Hydnora (Hydnoraceae). Aliso 12: 317-326.
32. Nickrent, D. L. 1994. From field to film: Rapid sequencing methods for field collected plant species. Biotechniques 16: 470-475.
33. Nickrent, D. L. 2002. Orígenes filogenéticos de las plantas parásitas. In J. A. López-Sáez, P. Catalán, and L. Sáez [eds.], Plantas Parásitas de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, 29-56. Mundi-Prensa Libros, S. A., Madrid, Spain.
34. Nickrent, D. L., and R. J. Duff. 1996. Molecular studies of parasitic plants using ribosomal RNA. In M. T. Moreno, J. I. Cubero, D. Berner, D. Joel, L. J. Musselman, and C. Parker [eds.], Advances in Parasitic Plant Research, 28-52. Junta de Andalucia. Dirección General de Investigación Agraria, Cordoba, Spain.
35. Nickrent, D. L., R. J. Duff, A. E. Colwell, A. D. Wolfe, N. D. Young, K. E. Steiner, and C. W. DePamphilis. 1998. Molecular phytogenetic and evolutionary studies of parasitic plants. In D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular Systematics of Plants II. DNA Sequencing, 211-241. Kluwer Academic, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
36. Nickrent, D. L., and E. M. Starr. 1994. High rates of nucleotide substitution in nuclear small-subunit (18S) rDNA from holoparasitic flowering plants. Journal of Molecular Evolution 39: 62-70.
37. Parkinson, C. L., K. L. Adams, and J. D. Palmer. 1999. Multigene analyses identify the three earliest lineages of extant flowering plants. Current Biology 9: 1485-1488.
38. Qiu, Y.-L., M. W. Chase, D. H. Les, and C. R. Parks. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of the Magnoliidae: Cladistic analysis of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. Annals Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 587-606.
39. Qiu, Y., Y. Lee, F. Bernasconi-Quadroni, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, M. Zanis, E. A. Zimmer, Z. Chen, V. Savolainen, and M. W. Chase. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: Evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature (London) 402: 404-409.
40. Qiu, Y.-L., J. Lee, F. Bernasconi-Quadroni, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, M. Zanis, E. A. Zimmer, Z. Chen, V. Savolainen, and M. W. Chase. 2000. Phylogeny of basal angiosperms: Analyses of five genes from three genomes. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: S3-S27.
41. Savolainen, V., M. W. Chase, and Y.-L. Qiu. 2000. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Systematic Biology 49: 306-362.
42. Solms-Laubach, H. 1894. Hydnoraceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], Die NatÜrlichen Planzenfamilien, Part III, 282-285. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
43. Soltis, D. E., M. E. Mort, P. S. Soltis, C. Hibsch-Jetter, E. A. Zimmer, and D. Morgan. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic angiosperm family Podostemaceae inferred from 18S rDNA and rbcL sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11: 261-272.
44. Soltis, D. E., et al. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnaean Society 133: 381-461.
45. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and other Methods), Version 4.0b9. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
46. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
47. Takhtajan, A. L., N. Meyer, R. Kosenko, and V. N. Kosenko. 1985. Pollen morphology and classification in Rafflesiaceae s. l. Botanichnyi Zhurnal 70: 153-162.
48. Thorne, R. F. 1992. An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 13: 365-389.
49. Thunberg, C. P. 1775. Beskrifning paa en ganska besynnerlig och obekant svamp, Hydnora africana. Konglia Vetenskaps Akademiens Handlingar 36: 69-75.
50. Tieghem, P. V. 1897. Sur la structure de l'ovule et de la graine chez les Hydnoracees. Journal de Botaniqae 11: 233-238.
51. Zanis, M., D. Soltis, P. Soltis, S. Mathews, and M. Donoghue. 2002. The root of angiosperms revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 6848-6853.