The questionable affinities of Lactoris: Evidence from branching pattern, inflorescence morphology, and stipule development

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 88, Issue 12, 2001, Pages 2143-2150

  González, Favio ^a   Rudall, Paula ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^b ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aristolochiaceae; Chloranthaceae; Cymes; Lactoris; Leaf ontogeny; Magnoliids; Monocotyledons; Piperaceae; Piperales; Sympodial growth

Indexed keywords

ARISTOLOCHIACEAE; CHLORANTHACEAE; LACTORIDACEAE; LACTORIS; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIIDS; PIPERACEAE; PIPERALES; RHIPIDIA; SAURURACEAE; THYRSOIDEA;

EID: 0011997720     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3558375     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. APG [ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP]. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531-553.
2. BEHNKE, H. D. 1988. Sieve-element plastids, phloem protein, and evolution of flowering plants. III. Magnoliidae. Taxon 37: 699-732.
3. BENTHAM, G., AND J. D. HOOKER. 1880. Genera Plantarum. Reeve and Co., London, UK.
4. BERNARDELLO, G., G. J. ANDERSON, P. LOPEZ, M. A. CLELAND, T. F. STUESSY, AND D. J. CRAWFORD. 1999. Reproductive biology of Lactoris fernandeziana (Lactoridaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 829-840.
5. BHARATHAN, G. 1996. Does the monocot mode of leaf development characterize all monocots? Aliso 14: 271-279.
6. BOUMAN, F. 1971. Integumentary studies in the Polycarpicae 1. Lactoridaceae. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 20: 565-569.
7. BRAUNER, S., D. J. CRAWFORD, AND T. F. STUESSY. 1992. Ribosomal DNA and RAPD variation in the rare plant family Lactoridaceae. American Journal of Botany 79: 1436-1439.
8. BURGER, W. C. 1977. The Piperales and the monocots. Alternative hypotheses for the origin of monocotyledoneous flowers. Botanical Review 43: 346-393.
9. CARLQUIST, S. 1964. Morphology and relationships of Lactoridaceae. Aliso 5: 421-435.
10. CARLQUIST, S. 1990. Wood anatomy and relationships of Lactoridaceae. American Journal of Botany 77: 1498-1505.
11. CARLQUIST, S. 1992. Wood anatomy and stem of Chloranthus; summary of wood anatomy of Chloranthaceae, with comments on relationships, vessellessness, and the origin of monocotyledons. IAWA Bulletin 13: 3-16.
12. CARLQUIST, S. 1993. Wood and bark anatomy of Aristolochiaceae; systematic and habital correlations. IAWA Journal 14: 341-357.
13. CARLQUIST, S., K. DAUER, AND S. Y. NISHIMRA. 1995. Wood and stem anatomy of Saururaceae with reference to ecology, phytogeny, and origin of the monocotyledons. IAWA Journal 16: 133-150.
14. CRAWFORD, D. J., T. F. STUESSY, M. B. COSNER, D. HAINES, D. WIENS, AND P. PENALILLO. 1994. Lactoris fernandeziana (Lactoridaceae) on the Juan Fernandez Islands: allozyme uniformity and field observations. Conservation Biology 8: 277-280.
15. CRAWFORD, D. J., T. F. STUESSY, AND M. SILVA. 1986. Leaf flavonoid chemistry and the relationships of the Lactoridaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 153: 133-139.
16. CRONQUIST, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
17. DAHLGREN, R., AND K. BREMER. 1985. Major clades of the angiosperms. Cladistics 1: 349-368.
18. DONOGHUE, M. J., AND J. A. DOYLE. 1989. Phylogenetic analysis of angiosperms and the relationships of Hamamelidae. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 1, 17-45. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
19. DOYLE, J. A., AND P. K. ENDRESS. 2000. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: comparison and combination with molecular data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (6 Supplement): S121-S153.
20. DUVALL, M. R. 2000. Seeking the dicot sister group of the monocots. In K. L. Wilson and D. A. Morrison [eds.], Monocots: systematics and evolution, 25-32. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.
21. ENDRESS, P. K. 1994. Floral structure and evolution of primitive angiosperms: recent advances. Plant Systematics and Evolution 192: 79-97.
22. ENGLER, A. 1887. Über die Familie der Lactoridaceae. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 8: 53-56.
23. ERDTMAN, G. 1952. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Pollen-morphologie von Lactoris fernandeziana und Drymis winteri. Grana Palynolagica 5: 33-39.
24. GLÜCK, H. 1919. Blatt- und blüttenmorphologische Studien. G. Fischer. Jena, Germany.
25. GONZÁLEZ, F. 1999a. A phylogenetic analysis of the Aristolochioideae (Aristolochiaceae). Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York. New York, New York, USA.
26. GONZALEZ, F. 1999b. Inflorescence morphology and the systematics of Aristolochiaceae. Systematics and Geography of Plants 68: 159-172.
27. GONZÁLEZ, F., P. J. RUDALL, AND C. A. FURNESS. In press. Microsporogenesis and systematics of Aristolochiaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.
28. GRAHAM, S. W., AND R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2000. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 87: 1712-1730.
29. HALLIER, H. 1903. Beitrage zur Morphologie der Sporophylle und des Trophophylls in Beziehung zur Phylogenie der Kormophyten. Jahrbuch der Hamburgischen Wissenschaftlichen Anstalten 19: 1-110.
30. HENNIG, S., W. BARTHLOTT, I. MEUSEL, AND I. THEISEN. 1994. Mikromorphologie der Epicuticularwachse und die Systematik der Magnoliidae, Ranunculidae und Hamamelididae. Tropische und subtropische Pflanzenwelt 90: 1-60.
31. IGERSHEIM, A., AND P. K. ENDRESS. 1998. Gynoecium diversity and systematics of the palaeoherbs. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 127: 289-370.
32. KUBITZKI, K. 1993. Lactoridaceae. In K. Kubitzki, J. C. Rower, and V. Bittrich [eds.], The families and genera of flowering plants, vol. 2. 359-361. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
33. LAMMERS, T., T. F. STUESSY, AND M. SILVA. 1986. Systematic relationships of the Lactoridaceae, an endemic family of the Juan Fernandez Islands, Chile. Plant Systematics and Evolution 152: 243-266.
34. LEMESLE, R. 1953. Nature des éléments sclerénchymateux de la tige du Lactoris fernandeziana Philippi. Revue Générale de Botanique 60: 15-22.
35. LEMESLE, R. 1955. Contribution a l'étude de quelques families de dicotyledones considérées comme primitives. Phytomorphology 5: 11-45.
36. LOCONTE, H., AND D. W. STEVENSON. 1991. Cladistics of the Magnoliidae. Cladistics 7: 267-296.
37. MACPHAIL, M. K., A. D. PARTRIDGE, AND E. M. TRUSWELL. 1999. Fossil pollen records of the problematical primitive angiosperm family Lactoridaceae in Australia. Plant Systematics and Evolution 214: 199-210.
38. MCLAUGHLIN, R. P. 1933. Systematic anatomy of the woods of the Magnoliales. Tropical Woods 34: 3-39.
39. MEEUSE, A. D. J. 1971. Interpretative gynoecial morphology of the Lactoridaceae and the Winteraceae: a re-assessment. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 20: 221-238.
40. MEEUSE, A. D. J. 1972. Taxonomic affinities between Piperales and Polycarpicae and their implications in interpretative floral morphology. Advances in Plant Morphology 1972: 3-27.
41. MELIKIAN, A. P., AND A. V. F. CH. BROBOV. 1999. Carpology of Lactoridaceae. Abstracts XVI. Abstract number 4871. International Botanical Congress, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
42. MOONEY, M., AND M. FREELING. 1997. Using regulatory genes to investigate the evolution of leaf form. Maydica 42: 173-184.
43. MUÑOZ-PIZARRO, C. 1966. Sinopsis de la Flora Chilena. Ediciones de la Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
44. NEINHUIS, C., T. BORSCH, AND K. W. HILU. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships within Aristolochiaceae based on TRNT-TRNF sequences. Abstracts XVI. Abstract number 351. International Botanical Congress, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
45. PONZO, A. 1934. Stipule e guaina. Nuovo Giornale Botanico Italiano, n.s. 41: 1-21.
46. QIU, Y-L., J. LEE, F. BERNASCONI-QUADRONI, D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, M. ZANIS, E. A. ZIMMER, Z. CHEN, V. SAVOLAINEN, AND M. W. CHASE. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402: 404-407.
47. QIU, Y-L., J. LEE, F. BERNASCONI-QUADRONI, D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, M. ZANIS, E. A. ZIMMER, Z. CHEN, V. SAVOLAINEN, AND M. W. CHASE. 2000. Phylogeny of basal angiosperms: analyses of five genes from three genomes. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Supplement): S3-S27.
48. ROTH, I. 1949. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Blattes, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Stipular- und Ligularbildungen. Planta 37: 299-336.
49. RUDALL, P. J., AND M. BUZGO. In press. The evolutionary history of the monocot leaf. In Q. Cronk, R. M. Bateman, and J. Hawkins [eds.], Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Taylor and Francis, London, UK.
50. SAMPSON, F. B. 1995. Pollen morphology of Lactoridaceae - a re-examination. Grana 34: 100-107.
51. SKOTTSBERG, C. 1928. Pollinationsbiologie und Samenverbreitung auf den Juan Fernandez-Inseln. In C. Skottsberg [ed.], The natural history of the Juan Fernandez and Easter Island, vol. 2, 503-547. Almwuist and Wiskell, Uppsala, Sweden.
52. SOLTIS, D. E., ET AL. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 381-461.
53. STEVENSON, D. W., AND H. LOCONTE. 1995. Cladistic analysis of the monocot families. In P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries [eds.], Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, vol. 2, 543-578. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
54. STUESSY, T. F., D. J. CRAWFORD, G. J. ANDERSON, AND R. J. JENNER. 1998. Systematics, biogeography and conservation of Lactoridaceae. Perspectives in Plant Evolution and Systematics 1-2: 267-290.
55. TAKHTAJAN, A. L. 1969. Flowering plants: origin and dispersal. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C., USA.
56. TAKHTAJAN, A. L. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Botanical Review 46: 225-359.
57. THORNE, R. F. 1974. A phylogenetic classification of the Annoniflorae. Aliso 8: 147-209.
58. TOBE, H., T. F. STUESSY, P. H. RAVEN, AND K. OGINUMA. 1993. Embryology and karyomorphology of Lactoridaceae. American Journal of Botany 80: 933-946.
59. TUCKER, S., AND A. W. DOUGLAS. 1996. Floral structure, development, and relationships of paleoherbs: Saruma, Cabomba, Lactoris, and selected Piperales. In D. W. Taylor and L. J. Mickey [eds.], Flowering plant origin, evolution and phylogeny, 141-175. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
60. WEBERLING, F. 1970. Weitere Untersuchungen zur Morphologie des Unterblattes bei den Dikotylen, V. Piperales. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 46: 403-434.
61. WEBERLING, F. 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. (Translated by R. J. Pankhurst). Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
62. ZAVADA, M. S., AND J. M. BENSON. 1987. First fossil evidence for the primitive angiosperm family Lactoridaceae. American Journal of Botany 74: 1590-1594.
63. ZAVADA, M. S., AND T. N. TAYLOR. 1986. Pollen morphology of Lactoridaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 154: 31-39.