The phylogenetic potential of entire 26S rDNA sequences in plants

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 251-263

  Kuzoff, Robert K ^a   Sweere, Jennifer A ^b   Soltis, Douglas E ^a   Soltis, Pamela S ^a   Zimmer, Elizabeth A ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION   (United States)

Author keywords

26S rDNA; Cryptic sequence simplicity; Expansion segments; LSU rDNA; Molecular evolution; Phylogenetic inference

Indexed keywords

RIBOSOME DNA;

ARTICLE; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; GENE DELETION; GENE INSERTION; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; TAXONOMY;

ANIMALIA; EMBRYOPHYTA; GNETALES; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SPERMATOPHYTA;

EID: 0031893927     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025922     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. APPELS, R., and R. L. HONEYCUTT. 1986. rDNA: evolution over a billion years. Pp. 81-135 in S. K. DUTTA, ed. DNA systematics, Vol. 2. Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
2. ARNHEIM, N. 1983. Concerted evolution of multigene families. Pp. 38-61 in M. NEI and R. K. KOEHN, eds. Evolution of genes and gene proteins. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
3. AUWERA, G. V. D., and R. DEWACHTER. 1996. Large-subunit rRNA sequence of the Chytridiomycete Blastocladiella emersonii and implications for the evolution of zoosporic fungi. J. Mol. Evol. 43:476-483.
4. BAUM, D. A. 1994. rbcL and seed-plant phylogeny. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:39-41.
5. BILOFSKY, H. S., C. BURKS, J. W. FICKETT, W. B. GOAD, F. I. LEWITTER, W. P. RINDONE, C. D. SWINDELL, and C. S. TUNG. 1986. The GenBank genetic sequence data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 14:1-4.
6. BUCHHEIM, M. A., and R. L. CHAPMAN. 1991. Phylogeny of the colonial green flagellates: a study of 18S and 26S rRNA sequence data. BioSystems 25:85-100.
7. BULT, C. J., M. KALLERSJO, and Y. SUH. 1992. Amplification and sequencing of 16/18S rDNA from gel-purified total plant DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 10:273-284.
8. BULT, C. J., J. A. SWEERE, and E. A. ZIMMER. 1995. Cryptic sequence simplicity, nucleotide composition bias, and molecular coevolution in the large subunit of ribosomal DNA in plants: implications for phylogenetic analyses. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 82:235-246.
9. BULT, C. J., and E. A. ZIMMER. 1993. Nuclear ribosomal RNA sequences for inferring tribal relationships within Onagraceae. Syst. Bot. 18:48-63.
10. CHASE, M. W., D. E. SOLTIS, R. G. OLMSTEAD et al. (42 co-authors). 1993. Phylogeneticts of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80:628-680.
11. CLARK, G. B., B. W. TAGUE, V. C. WARE, and S. A. GERBI. 1984. Xenopus laevis 28S ribosomal RNA: a secondary structure and its evolutionary and functional implications. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:6197-6220.
12. CRANE, P. R., E. M. FRIIS, and K. R. PEDERSEN. 1995. The origin and early diversification of angiosperms. Nature 374: 27-33.
13. DIXON, M. T., and D. M. HILLIS. 1993. Ribosomal RNA secondary structure - compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:256-267.
14. DOVER, G. A., and R. B. FLAVELL. 1984. Molecular coevolution: DNA divergence and the maintenance of function. Cell 38:622-623.
15. DOYLE, J. A., M. J. DONOGHUE, and E. A. ZIMMER. 1994. Integration of morphological and ribosomal RNA data on the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 81:419-450.
16. DOYLE, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:144-163.
17. _. 1993. DNA, phylogeny, and the flowering of plant systematics. BioScience 43:380-389.
18. FARRIS, J. S. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18:374-385.
19. FLAVELL, R. B. 1986. Structure and control of expression of ribosomal RNA genes. Oxf. Surv. Plant Mol. Cell Biol. 3: 252-274.
20. GENE CODES CORPORATION, INC. 1994. Sequencher™ 2.1 reference, advanced, user friendly software tools for DNA sequencing. Gene Codes Corporation, Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich.
21. GENETICS COMPUTER GROUP. 1994. Program manual for the GCG package. Version 8. Genetics Computer Group, Madison, Wis.
22. GERBI, S. A., C. JEPPESEN, B. STEBBINS-BOAZ, and M. ARES JR. 1987. Evolution of eukaryotic rRNA: constraints imposed by RNA interactions. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. L11:709-719.
23. HAMBY, K. R., and E. A. ZIMMER. 1988. Ribosomal RNA sequences for inferring phylogeny within the grass family (Poaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 160:29-37.
24. _. 1992. Ribosomal RNA as a phylogenetic tool in plant systematics. Pp. 50-91 in P. SOLTIS, D. SOLTIS, and J. DOYLE, eds. Molecular systematics of plants. Chapman and Hall, New York.
25. HANCOCK, J. M., and J. S. ARMSTRONG. 1994. SIMPLE34: an improved and enhanced implementation for VAX and SUN computers of the SIMPLE algorithm for the analysis of clustered repetitive sequences. CABIOS 10:67-70.
26. HANCOCK, J. M., and G. A. DOVER. 1988. Molecular coevolution among cryptically simple expansion segments of eukaryotic 26S/28S rRNAs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:377-391.
27. _. 1990. 'Compensatory slippage' in the evolution of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:377-391.
28. HASSOUNA, N., B. MICHOT, and J. BACHELLERIE. 1984. The complete nucleotide sequence of mouse 28S rRNA gene: implications for the process of size increase of the large subunit rRNA in higher eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 12: 3563-3574.
29. HILLIS, D. M., and M. T. DIXON. 1991. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q. Rev. Biol. 66:411-453.
30. HILLIS, D. M., and J. P. HUELSENBECK. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. J. Hered. 83:189-195.
31. HOLZMANN, M., W. PILLER, and J. PAWLOWSKI. 1996. Sequence variation in the large-subunit ribosomal RNA gene of Ammonia (Foraminifera, Protozoa) and their evolutionary implications. J. Mol. Evol. 43:145-151.
32. JOHNSON, L. A., and D. E. SOLTIS. 1994. matK DNA sequences and phylogenetic reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s. s. Syst. Bot. 19:143-156.
33. JUKES, T. H., and C. R. CANTOR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pp. 21-132 in H. N. MUNRO, ed. Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York.
34. KIMURA, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120.
35. KISS, T., M. KISS, and F. SOLYMOSY. 1989. Nucleotide sequence of a 25S rRNA gene from tomato. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:796.
36. KOLOSHA, V. O., and I. I. FODOR. 1990. Nucleotide sequence of Citrus limon 26S rRNA gene and secondary structure model of its RNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 14:147-161.
37. KRON, K. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships of Empetraceae, Epacridaceae, and Ericaceae: evidence from nuclear ribosomal 18S sequence data. Ann. Bot. 77:293-303.
38. LAKE, J. 1994. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: paralinear distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1455-1459.
39. LARSON, A. 1991. Evolutionary analysis of length variable sequences: divergence domains of ribosomal RNA. Pp. 221-247 in M. MIYAMOTO and J. CRACRAFT, eds. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences. Oxford University Press, New York.
40. LARSON, A., and A. C. WILSON. 1989. Patterns of ribosomal RNA evolution in salamanders. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6:131-154.
41. LEWIS, P. O. 1998. Alternatives to parsimony for inferring phylogeny using nucleotide sequence data. In D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, and J. J. DOYLE, eds. Molecular systematics of plants II. Chapman and Hall, New York (in press).
42. LOCKHARDT, P. J., M. A. STEELE, M. D. HENDY, and D. PENNY. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:605-612.
43. MADDISON, W. P., and D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade. Version 3.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
44. MISHLER, B. D., L. A. LEWIS, M. A. BUCHHEIM, K. S. RENZAGLIA, D. J. GARBARY, C. F. DELWICHE, F. W. ZECHMAN, T. S. KANTZ, and R. L. CHAPMAN. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of the "green algae" and "bryophytes" Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 81:451-483.
45. MORGAN, D. R., and D. E. SOLTIS. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships among Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80:631-660.
46. NICKRENT, D. L., and D. E. SOLTIS. 1995. A comparison of angiosperm phylogenies from nuclear 18S rDNA and rbcL sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 82:208-234.
47. NUNN, G. B., B. F. THEISEN, B. CHRISTENSEN, and P. ARCTANDER. 1996. Simplicity-correlated size growth of the nuclear 28S ribosomal RNA D3 expansion segment in the crustacean order Isopoda. J. Mol. Evol. 42:221-223.
48. OKUMURA, S., and H. SHIMADA. 1992. Nucleotide sequence of genes for 5.8S and 25S rRNA from rapeseed (Brassica napus). Nucleic Acids Res. 20:3510.
49. OLMSTEAD, R. G., H. J. MICHAELS, K. M. SCOTT, and J. PALMER. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages as inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 79:249-265.
50. OLMSTEAD, R. G., and J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43: 467-481.
51. RO, K., C. S. KEENER, and B. A. MCPHERON. 1997. Molecular phylogenetic study of the Ranunculaceae: utility of the nuclear 26S ribosomal DNA in inferring intrafamilial relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8:117-127.
52. SANDERSON, M. J., and M. J. DONOGHUE. 1996. The relationship between homoplasy and confidence in a phylogenetic tree. Pp. 67-89 in M. J. SANDERSON and L. HUFFORD, eds. Homoplasy and the evolutionary process. Academic Press, New York.
53. SOLTIS, D. E., D. R. MORGAN, A. GRABLE, P. S. SOLTIS, and R. K. KUZOFF. 1993. Molecular systematics of Saxifragaceae sensu stricto. Am. J. Bot. 80:1056-1081.
54. SOLTIS, D. E., and P. S. SOLTIS. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships among Saxifragaceae sensu lato: a comparison of topologies based in 18S rDNA and rbcL sequences. Am. J. Bot. 84:504-522.
55. _. 1998. Choosing an approach and an appropriate gene for phylogenetic analysis. In D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, and J. J. DOYLE, eds. Molecular systematics of plants II. Chapman and Hall, New York (in press).
56. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, D. L. NICKRENT et al. (16 co-authors). 1997. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 84:1-49.
57. STEEL, M. 1994. Recovering a tree from the Markov leaf colourations it generates under a Markov model. Appl. Math. Lett. 7:19-23.
58. STEFANOVIC, S., M. JAGER, J. DEUTSCH, J. BROUTIN, and M. MASSELOT. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of conifers inferred from partial 28S rDNA gene sequences. Am. J. Bot. (in press).
59. SUGIURA, M., Y. IIDA, K. OONO, and F. TAKAIWA. 1985. The complete nucleotide sequence of a rice 25S rRNA gene. Gene 37:255-259.
60. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, and D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pp. 407-514 in D. M. HILLIS, C. MORITZ, and B. K. MABLE, eds. Molecular systematics. 2nd edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
61. TAUTZ, D., M. TRICK, and G. A. DOVER. 1986. Cryptic simplicity in DNA is a major source of genetic variation. Nature 322:652-656.
62. UNFRIED, I., and P. GRUENDLER. 1990. Nucleotide sequence of the 5.8S and 25S rRNA genes and of the internal transcribed spacers from Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:4011.
63. VOGLER, A. P., A. WELSCH, and J. M. HANCOCK. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of slippage-like sequence variation in the V4 rRNA expansion segment in tiger beetles (Cicindelidae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:6-19.
64. WAKELEY, J. 1996. The excess of transitions among nucleotide substitutions: new methods of estimating transition bias underscore its significance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:158-163.
65. WILLIAMS, P. L., and W. M. FITCH. 1990. Phylogenetic determination using dynamically weighted parsimony method. Methods Enzymol. 183:615-626.
66. YANG, Z. 1996. Among site variation and its impact on phylogenetic analysis. Trends Evol. Ecol. 11:367-372.
67. ZIMMER, E. A., S. L. MARTIN, S. M. BEVERLEY, Y. W. KAN, and A. C. WILSON. 1980. Rapid duplications and loss of genes coding for alpha chains of hemoglobin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:2158-2162.