Networks for recognition of biomolecules: Molecular imprinting and micropatterning poly (ethylene glycol)-containing films

Polymers for Advanced Technologies

Volumn 13, Issue 10-12, 2002, Pages 798-816

  Byrne, Mark E ^a   Oral, Ebru ^a   Hilt, J Zachary ^a   Peppas, Nicholas A ^a,b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomimetic; Free radical photopolymerization; Micropatterning; Molecular imprinting; Molecular recognition

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXATION; COPOLYMERS; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; GELS; MOLECULAR ORIENTATION; PROTEINS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

FUNCTIONAL MONOMERS;

POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

BIOMEDICAL APPLICATION; GEL;

EID: 0036825580     PISSN: 10427147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pat.272     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Langer R. Drugs on target. Science 2001; 293: 58.
2. Kataoka K, Miyazaki H, Bunya M, Okano T, Sakurai Y. Totally synthetic polymer gels responding to external glucose concentration: their preparation and application to on-off regulation of insulin release. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 12694.
3. Podual K, Doyle FJ, Peppas NA. Glucose-sensitive cationic hydrogels: preparation, characterization and modeling of swelling properties. In Biomaterials, Carriers for Drug Delivery and Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering, Peppas NA, Mooney DJ, Mikos AG, Brannon-Peppas L (eds). AIChe: Washington, DC, 1997; 190-192.
4. Albin G, Horbett TA, Ratner BD. Glucose sensitive membranes for controlled delivery of insulin. J. Control. Release 1985; 2: 153.
5. Torres-Lugo M, Peppas NA. Novel pH-sensitive hydrogels for the oral delivery of calcitonin. Macromolecules 1999; 32: 6646.
6. Torres-Lugo M, Ichikawa H, Peppas NA. Cytotoxicity and transport enhancement of proteins through cell monolayers using novel pH-sensitive hydrogels. Proceed. World Meeting APV/APGI 2000; vol. 3:201.
7. Borchardt RT, Knipp G, Ho N, Barsuhn C. Paracellular diffusion in Caco-2 cell monolayers: effect of perturbation on the transport of hydrophilic compounds that vary in charge and size. J. Pharm. Sci. 1997; 86: 1105.
8. Peppas NA. Hydrogels in Medicine and Pharmacy. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1987.
9. Peppas NA, Bures P, Leobandung W, Ichikawa H. Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2000; 50: 27.
10. Qiu Y, Park K. Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 2001; 53: 321.
11. Madsen F, Peppas NA. Complexation graft copolymer networks: swelling properties, calcium binding and proteolytic enzyme inhibition. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 1701.
12. Lehr CM. Bioadhesion technologies for the delivery of peptide and protein drugs to the gastrointestinal tract. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug 1994; 11: 119.
13. Peppas NA, Langer R. New challenges in biomaterials. Science 1994; 263: 1715.
14. Healy KE. Molecular engineering of materials for bioreactivity. Curr. Opin. Solid St. M. 1999; 4: 381.
15. Ratner BD. The engineering of biomaterials exhibiting recognition and specificity. J. Mol. Recognit. 1996; 9: 617.
16. Ratner BD, Shi H. Recognition templates for biomaterials with engineered bioreactivity. Curr. Opin. Solid St. M. 1999; 4: 395.
17. Ball P. Designing the Molecular World. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 1995.
18. Byrne ME, Park K, Peppas NA. Molecular imprinting within hydrogels. Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 2002; 54: 149.
19. Byrne ME, Hilt JZ, Bashir R, Park K, Peppas NA. Biomimetic materials for selective recognition and microsensing of biologically significant molecules. Trans. Soc. Biomater. 2002; 28: 78.
20. Byrne ME, Henthorn DB, Huang Y, Peppas NA. Micropatterning biomimetic materials for bioadhesion and drug delivery. In Biomimetic Materials and Design: Interactive Biointerfacial Strategies, Tissue Engineering, and Targeted Drug Delivery, Dillow AK, Lowman A (eds). Marcel Dekker: New York, 2002; pp. 443-470.
21. La Van DA, Lynn DM, Langer R. Moving smaller in drug discovery and delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002; 1: 77.
22. Li T, Lee H, Park K. Comparative stereochemical analysis of glucose-binding proteins for rational design of glucose specific agents. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Edn. 1998; 9: 327.
23. Yu C, Ramstrom O, Mosbach K. Enantiomeric recognition by molecularly imprinted polymers using hydrophobic interactions. Anal. Lett. 1997; 30: 2123.
24. Yu C, Mosbach K. Molecular imprinting utilizing an amide functional group for hydrogen bonding leading to highly efficient polymers. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 4057.
25. Haupt K. Noncovalent molecular imprinting of a synthetic polymer with the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in the presence of polar protic solvents. In Molecular and Ionic Recognition with Imprinted Polymers, ACS Symposium Series 703, Bartsch RA, Maeda M (eds). ACS: Washington, DC, 1998; 135-142.
26. Hoffman AS. Molecular bioengineering of biomaterials in the 1990s and beyond: a growing liaison of polymers with molecular biology. Artif. Organs 1992; 16: 43.
27. Ding Z, Fong RB, Long CJ, Stayton PS, Hoffman AS. Size-dependent control of the binding of biotinylated proteins to streptavidin using a polymer shield. Nature 2001; 411: 59.
28. Bulmus V, Ding Z, Long CJ, Stayton PS, Hoffman AS. Site-specific polymer-streptavidin bioconjugate for pH-controlled binding and triggered release of biotin. Bioconjugate Chem. 2000; 11: 78.
29. Hoffman AS, Stayton PS, Bulmus V, Chen G, Chen J, Cheung C, Chilkoti A, Ding Z, Dong L, Fong R, Lackey CA, Long CJ, Miura M, Morris JE, Murthy N, Nabeshima Y, Park TG, Press OW, Shimoboji T, Shoemaker S, Yang HJ, Monji N, Nowinski RC, Cole CA, Priest JH, Harris JM, Nakamae K, Nishino T, Miyata T. Really smart bioconjugates of smart polymers and receptor proteins. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000; 52: 577.
30. Hubbell JA. Bioactive biomaterials. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 1999; 10: 123.
31. Kokufuta E, Zhang YQ, Tanaka T. Saccharidesensitive phase transition of lectin-loaded gel. Nature 1991; 351: 302.
32. Obaidat AA, Park K. Characterization of glucose dependent gel-sol phase transition of polymeric glucose-concanavalin A hydrogel system. Pharmaceut. Res. 1996; 13: 989.
33. Podual K, Doyle FJ, Peppas NA. Glucose-sensitivity of glucose oxidase-containing cationic copolymer hydrogels having poly(ethylene glycol) grafts. J. Control. Release 2000; 67: 9.
34. Miyata T, Jikihara A, Nakamae K, Hoffman AS. Preparation of poly(2-glucosyloxyethyl methacrylate)-concanavalin A complex hydrogel and its glucose-sensitivity. Macromol. Chem. Physic. 1996; 197: 1147.
35. Shi H, Ratner BD. Template recognition of protein-imprinted polymer surfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000; 49: 1.
36. Shi H, Tsai W, Garrison MD, Ferrari S, Ratner BD. Template-imprinted nanostructured surfaces for protein recognition. Nature 1999; 398: 593.
37. Wulff G. Molecular imprinting in cross-linked materials with the aid of molecular templates - a way towards artificial antibodies. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 1995; 34: 1812.
38. Sellergren B. Noncovalent molecular imprinting: antibody-like molecular recognition in polymeric network materials. Trends Anal. Chem. 1997; 16: 310.
39. Enoki T, Tanaka K, Watanabe T, Oya T, Sakiyama T, Takeoka Y, Ito K, Wang G, Annaka M, Hara K, Du R, Chuang J, Wasserman K, Grosberg AY, Masamune S, Tanaka T. Frustrations in polymer conformation in gels and their minimization through molecular imprinting. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000; 85: 5000.
40. Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Guney O, Oya T, Sakai Y, Kobayashi M, Enoki T, Takeoka Y, Ishibashi T, Kuroda K, Tanaka K, Wang G, Grosberg AY, Masamune S, Tanaka T. Polymer gels that memorize elements of molecular conformation. Macromolecules 2000; 33: 8693.
41. Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Guney O, Oya T, Sakai Y, Kobayashi M, Enoki T, Takeoka Y, Ishibashi T, Kuroda K, Tanaka K, Wang G, Grosberg AY, Masamune S, Tanaka T. Reversible adsorption of calcium ions by imprinted temperature sensitive gels. J. Chem. Phys. 2001; 114: 2812.
42. Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Hiratani H, Tanaka K, Stancil K, Grosberg AY, Tanaka T. Simultaneous multiple-point adsorption of aluminum ions and charged molecules by a polyampholyte thermosensitive gel: controlling frustrations in a heteropolymer gel. Langmuir 2001; 17: 3616.
43. Hiratani H, Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Chuang J, Guney O, Grosberg AY, Tanaka T. Effect of reversible cross-linker, n,n-bis(acryloyl)cystamine, on calcium ion adsorption by imprinted gels. Langmuir 2001; 17: 4431.
44. Peppas NA, Huang Y. Polymers and gels as molecular recognition agents. Pharmaceut. Res. 2002; 19: 578-587.
45. Oh K, Jeong K, Moore JS. Folding driven synthesis of oligomers. Nature 2001; 414: 889.
46. Choi H, Kim O, Chung C, Cho C. Novel mucoadhesive polymer prepared by template polymerization of acrylic acid in the presence of poly(ethylene glycol). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1999; 73: 2749.
47. Al-Alawi S, Saeed NA. Preparation and separation of complexes prepared by template polymerization. Macromolecules 1990; 23: 4474.
48. Dhal PK, Arnold FH. Metal-coordinated interactions in the template-mediated synthesis of substrate-selective polymers: recognition of bis(imidazole) substrates by copper(II) iminodiacetate containing polymers. Macromolecules 1992; 25: 7051.
49. Whitcombe M, Rodriguez ME, Villar P, Vulfson EN. A new method for the introduction of recognition site functionality into polymers prepared by molecular imprinting: synthesis and characterization of polymeric receptors for cholesterol. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1995; 117: 7105.
50. Sellergren B. Important considerations in the design of receptor sites using noncovalent molecular imprinting. In Molecular and Ionic Recognition with Imprinted Polymers, ACS Symposium Series 703, Bartsch RA, Maeda M (eds). ACS: Washington, DC, 1998; 49-79.
51. Arnold FH. Molecular printing: new materials for biological recognition. J. Mol. Recognit. 1995; 8: 206.
52. Oral E, Peppas NA. Molecular imprinting in biological systems. S.T.P. Pharma. Sci. 2000; 10: 261.
53. Ansell RJ, Mosbach K. Molecularly imprinted polymers: new tools for biomedical science. Pharm. News. 1996; 3: 16.
54. Andersson LI, Muller R, Vlatakis G, Mosbach K. Mimics of the binding sites of opioid receptors obtained by molecular imprinting of enkephalin and morphine. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1995; 92: 4788.
55. Fischer L, Muller R, Ekberg B, Mosbach K. Direct enantioseparation of beta-adrenergic blockers using a chiral stationary phase prepared by molecular imprinting. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1991; 113: 9358.
56. Lubke C, Lubke M, Whitcombe MJ, Vulfson EN. Imprinted polymers prepared with stoichiometric template-monomer complexes: efficient binding of ampicillin from aqueous solutions. Macromolecules 2000; 33: 5098.
57. Martin P, Wilson ID, Jones GR. Optimization of procedures for the extraction of structural analogues of propranalol with molecular imprinted polymers for sample preparation. J. Chromatogr. A. 2000; 889: 143.
58. Kempe M, Mosbach K. Direct resolution of naproxen on a non-covalently molecularly imprinted chiral stationary phase. J. Chromatogr. A. 1994; 664: 276.
59. Vlatakis G, Andersson LI, Muller R, Mosbach K. Drug assay using antibody mimics made by molecular imprinting. Nature 1993; 361: 645.
60. Ye L, Weiss R, Mosbach K. Synthesis and characterization of molecularly imprinted microspheres. Macromolecules 2000; 33: 8239.
61. Hishiya T, Shibata M, Kakazu M, Asanuma H, Komiyama M. Molecularly imprinted cyclodextrins as selective receptors for steroids. Macromolecules 1999; 32: 2265.
62. Cheong SH, McNiven S, Rachkov A, Levi R, Yano K, Karube I. Testosterone receptor binding mimic constructed using molecular imprinting. Macromolecules 1997; 30: 1317.
63. Rachkov AE, Cheong S, Elskaya AV, Yano K, Karube I. Molecularly imprinted polymers as artificial steroid receptors. Polym. Adv. Technol. 1998; 9: 511.
64. Matsui J, Hagashi M, Takeuchi T. Molecularly imprinted polymer as 9-ethyladenine receptor having a porphyrin-based recognition center. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 5218.
65. Spivak DA, Shea KJ. Binding of nucleotide bases by imprinted polymers. Macromolecules 1998; 31: 2160.
66. Yoshida M, Uezu K, Goto M, Furusaki S. Metal ion imprinted microsphere prepared by surface molecular imprinting technique using water-in-oil-in-water emulsions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1999; 73: 1223.
67. Yoshida M, Hatate Y, Uezu K, Goto M, Furusaki S. Metal-imprinted microsphere prepared by surface template polymerization and its application to chromatography. J. Polym. Sci. Poly. Chem. 2000; 38: 689.
68. Piletsky SA, Parhometz YP, Lavryk NV, Panasyuk TL, Elskaya AV. Sensors for low-weight organic molecules based on molecular imprinting technique. Sensor. Actuat. B.-Chem. 1994; 19: 629.
69. Rachkov A, Minoura N. Towards molecularly imprinted polymers selective to peptides and proteins. The epitope approach. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001; 1544: 255.
70. Haginaka J, Takehira H, Hosoya K, Tanaka N. Uniform-sized molecularly imprinted polymer for (S)-naproxen selectively modified with hydrophilic external layer. J. Chromatogr. A. 1999; 849: 331.
71. Haupt K. Molecularly imprinted sorbent assays and the use of non-related probes. React. Funct. Polym. 1999; 41: 125.
72. Asanuma H, Kajiya K, Hishiya T, Komiyama M. Molecular imprinting of cyclodextrin in water for the recognition of peptides. Chem. Lett. 1999; 7: 665.
73. Cormack PAG, Mosbach K. Molecular imprinting: recent developments and the road ahead. React. Funct. Polym. 1999; 41: 115.
74. Ekberg B, Mosbach K. Molecular imprinting: a technique for producing specific separation materials. Trends Biotechnol. 1989; 7: 92.
75. Mosbach K, Haupt K, Liu X-C, Cormack PAG, Ramstrom O. Molecular imprinting: status artis et quo vadere? In Molecular and Ionic Recognition with Imprinted Polymers, ACS Symposium Series 703, Bartsch RA, Maeda M (eds). ACS: Washington, DC, 1998; 29-48.
76. Sellegren B, Shea KJ. Influence of polymer morphology on the ability of imprinted network polymers to resolve enantiomers. J. Chromatogr. 1993; 635: 31.
77. Odion G. Principles of Polymerization. Wiley: New York, 1991.
78. p for elementary processes. Eur. Polym. J. 1991; 27: 743.
79. Matuszewska-Czerwik J, Polowinski S. Template photopolymerization of methacrylic acid in water-IV. Determination of rate constants of elementary processes. Eur. Polym. J. 1991; 27: 1335.
80. Matuszewska-Czerwik J, Polowinski S. Template photopolymerization of methacrylic acid in water-V. Low molecular weight templates. Eur. Polym. J. 1992; 28: 1481.
81. Tan YY, Alberda von Ekenstein GOR. A generalized kinetic model for radical-initiated template polymerizations in dilute template systems. Macromolecules 1991; 24: 1641.
82. Ward JH, Peppas NA. Preparation of controlled release systems by free-radical UV polymerizations in the presence of a drug. J. Control. Rel. 2001; 71: 183.
83. Vo-Dinh T, Cullum B. Biosensors and biochips: advances in biological and medical devices. Fresen. J. Anal. Chem. 2000; 366: 540.
84. Voldman J, Gray ML, Schmidt MA. Microfabrication in biology and medicine. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1999; 1: 401.
85. Madou M, Florkey J. From batch to continuous manufacturing of microbiomedical devices. Chem. Rev. 2000; 100: 2679.
86. Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Nanotechniques and approaches in biotechnology. TRENDS Biotechnol. 2001; 19: 97.
87. Peppas NA. Physiologically responsive gels. J. Bioact. Compat. Pol. 1991; 6: 241.
88. Nakayama Y, Anderson JM, Matsuda T. Laboratory-scale mass production of a multi-micropatterned grafted surface with different polymer regions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.-A 2000; 53: 584.
89. Ito Y. Surface micropatterning to regulate cell functions. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 2333.
90. Beebe DJ, Moore JS, Bauer JM, Yu Q, Liu RH, Devadoss C, Jo B. Functional hydrogel structures for autonomous flow control inside microfluidic channels. Nature 2000; 404: 588.
91. Beebe DJ, Moore JS, Yu Q, Liu RH, Kraft ML, Jo B, Devadoss C. Microfluidic tectonics: a comprehensive construction platform for microfluidic systems. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000; 97: 13488.
92. Plueddemann EP. Silane Coupling Agents, 2nd edn. Plenum Press: New York, 1991.