Phylogenetic analyses of Trilliaceae based on morphological and molecular data

Systematic Botany

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 674-692

  Farmer, Susan B ^a   Schilling, Edward E ^a   Rettig, Jeff H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PSEUDOTRILLIUM; TRILLIDIUM; TRILLIUM GOVANIANUM; TRILLIUM RIVALE;

EID: 0036814992     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531-553.
2. Baldwin, B. G., M. J. Sanderson, J. M. Porter, M. F. Wojciechowski, C. S. Campbell, and M. J. Donoghue. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
3. Bentham, G. and J. D. Hooker. 1883. Genera Plantarum. London: Reeve & Co.
4. Berg, R. Y. 1959. Morphology and Taxonomic Position of Scoliopus, Liliaceae. Skrifter Utgitt av det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo I. Matematisk-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse. Ny Serie. No. 4.
5. _. 1962. Morphology and Taxonomic Position of Medeola, Liliaceae. Skrifter Utgitt av det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo I. Matematisk-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse. Ny Serie. No. 3.
6. Brummitt, R. K. and C. E. Powell. 1992. Vascular Plant Families and Genera. Kew, U.K.: Royal Botanic Gardens.
7. Bull, J. J., J. P. Huelsenbeck, C. W. Cunningham, D. L. Swofford, and P. J. Waddell. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 384-397.
8. Case, F. W. and R. B. Case. 1997. Trilliums. Portland: Timber Press.
9. Chase, M. W., M. R. Duvall, H. G. Hills, J. G. Conran, A. V. Cox, L. E. Eguiarte, J. Hartwell, M. F. Fay, L. R. Caddick, K. M. Cameron, and S. Hoot. 1995a. Molecular phylogenies of Lilianae. Pp. 109-137 in Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution, eds. P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
10. -, D. E. Soltis, R. G. Olmstead, D. Morgan, D. H. Les, B. D. Mishler, M. R. Duvall, R. A. Price, H. G. Hills, Y. L. Qiu, K. A. Kron, J. H. Rettig, E. Conti, J. D. Palmer, J. R. Manhart, K. J. Sytsma, H. J. Michaels, W. J. Kress, K. G. Karol, W. D. Clark, M. Hedren, B. S. Gaut, R. K. Jansen, K. J. Kim, C. F. Wimper, J. F. Smith, G. R. Furnier, S. H. Strauss, Q. Y. Xiang, G. M. Plunkett, P. S. Soltis, S. M. Swensen, S. E. Williams, P. A. Gadek, C. J. Quinn, L. E. Eguiarte, E. Golenberg, G. H. Learn, JR., S. W. Graham, S. C. H. Barrett, S. Dayanandan, and V. A. Albert. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
11. _, _, P. S. Soltis, P. J. Rudall, M. F. Fay, W. H. Hahn, S. Sullivan, J. Joseph, M. Molvray, P. J. Kores, T. J. Givnish, K. J. Sytsma, and J. C. Pires. 2000. Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: An assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. Pp. 3-16 in Monocots: Systematics and evolution, eds K. L. Wilson and D. A. Morrison. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
12. _, D. W. Stevenson, P. Wilkin, and P. J. Rudall. 1995b. Monocot systematics: A combined analysis, Pp. 685-730 in Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution, eds. P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
13. Cronquist, A. 1968. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. London, U.K.: Nelson.
14. Dahlgren, R. M. T. 1975. A system of classification to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. Botaniska Notiser 128: 119-147.
15. _ and H. T. Clifford. 1982. The Monocotyledons: A Comparative Study. London: Academic Press.
16. _, _, and P. F. Yeo 1985. The Families of the Monocotyledons: Structure, Evolution, and Taxonomy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
17. Dalla Torre, K. W. Von and H. Harms. 1908. Genera Siphonogamarum ad Systems Englerianum Conscripta. Lipsiae: G. Engelmann.
18. Davis, J. I. 1995. A phylogenetic structure for the monocotyledons, as inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation, and a comparison of measures of clade support. Systematic Botany 20: 503-527.
19. _, M. P. Simmons, D. W. Stevenson, and J. F. Wendel. 1998. Data decisiveness, data quality, and incongruence in phylogenetic analyses: An example from the monocotyledons using the mitochondrial atpA sequences. Systematic Biology 47: 282-310.
20. De Jussieu, A. L. 1789. Genera Plantarum Secundum Ordines Naturales Disposita. Paris: Viduam Herissant.
21. Dumortier, ParB.-C. 1829. Analyse des Families des Plantes Avec l'Indication des Principaus Cenres que s'y Battachent. Tournay: J. Casterman.
22. Endlicher, S. 1836-1840. Genera Plantarum. Vindobonae: Apud Fr. Beck Universitatis Bibliopolam.
23. Engler, A. 1888. Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. II Leipzig: W. Engleman.
24. Farmer, S. B. 2000. Toward an Understanding of the Global Phylogeny of Trilliaceae. M.S. Thesis. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
25. Farris, J. S., M. Källersjö, A. C. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1995a. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Systematic Biology 44: 570-572.
26. _, _, _, and _. 1995b. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
27. Felsenstein, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 27: 401-410.
28. _. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
29. Freeman, J. D. 1969. A Revisionary Study of Sessile-Flowered Trillium L. (Liliaceae). Ph.D. Dissertation. Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN.
30. _. 1975. Revision of Trillium subgenus Phyllantherum (Liliaceae). Brittonia 27: 1-62.
31. Fukuda, I. 2001a. The origin and evolution in Trillium. 1. The origin of the Himalayan Trillium govanianum. Cytologia 66: 106-111.
32. _. 2001b. The origin and evolution in Trillium. 2. Chromosome variation of Trillium undulatum in North America. Cytologia 66: 319-327.
33. Fuse, S. and M. N. Tamura. 1999. Early evolutionary process of the monocotyledons inferred from matK DNA sequences with special reference to the phylogeny of Melanthiaceae s. 1. (abstract). International Botanical Congress XVII (unpublished).
34. _ and _. 2000. A phylogenetic approach of the plastid matK gene with emphasis on Melanthiaceae sensu lato. Plant Biology 2: 415-427.
35. Gates, R. R. 1917. A systematic study of the North American genus Trillium, its variability, and its relation to Paris and Medeola. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 4: 43-93.
36. Goldblatt, F. 1995. The status of R. Dahlgren's orders Liliales and Melanthiales. Pp. 181-200 in Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution, eds. P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
37. Graybeal, A. 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Systematic Biology 47: 9-17.
38. Halanych, K. M. 1998. Lagomorphs misplaced by more characters and fewer taxa. Systematic Biology 47: 138-146.
39. Hara, H. 1969. Variations in Paris polyphylla Smith with reference to other Asiatic species. Journal of the Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo, Section 3, Botany 10(10): 141-180, pl. 1-6.
40. _, W. T. Stearn, and L. H. J. Williams. 1978. An Enumeration of the Flowering Plants of Nepal. London: British Museum (Natural History).
41. Huang, T. C., S. F. Huang, and K. C. Yang. 1989. Notes on the flora of Taiwan. Taiwania 34: 45-52.
42. Huber, H. 1969. Die samenmerkmale und verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der Liliiflorae. Mitteilung Botanische Staatssammlung München. 8: 219-538.
43. _. 1977. The treatment of the monocotyledons in an evolutionary system of classification. Plant Systematics and Ecology, Supplement 1: 285-298.
44. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1997. Is the Felsenstein zone a fly trap? Systematic Biology 46: 69-74.
45. _, J. J. Bull, and C. W. Cunningham. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 152-158.
46. Hutchinson, J. 1926. The Families of Flowering Plants. Vol. 2. Monocotyledons. London: Clarendon Press.
47. Kato, H., S. Kawano, R. Terauchi, M. Ohara, and F. H. Utech. 1995a. Evolutionary biology of Trillium and related genera (Trilliaceae) I. Restriction site mapping and variation of chloroplast DNA and its systematic implications. Plant Species Biology 10: 17-29.
48. _, R. Terauchi, F. H. Utech, and S. Kawano. 1995b. Molecular systematics of the Trilliaceae sensu lato as inferred from rbcL sequence data. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution 4: 184-193.
49. Kazempour Osaloo, S. and S. Kawano. 1999. Molecular systematics of Trilliaceae II. Phylogenetic analyses of Trillium and its allies using sequences of rbcL and matK genes of cpDNA and internal transcribed spacers of 18s-26s nrDNA. Plant Species Biology 14: 75-94.
50. _, F. H. Utech, M. Ohara, and S. Kawano. 1999. Molecular systematics of Trilliaceae I. Phylogenetic analysis of Trillium using mark gene sequences. Journal of Plant Research 112: 35-49.
51. Kluge, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38: 7-25.
52. Kron, K. A. and W. S. Judd. 1997. Systematics of the Lyonia group (Andromedeae, Ericaceae) and the use of species as terminals in higher-level cladistic analyses. Systematic Botany 22: 479-492.
53. Kunth, C. S. 1850. Enumeratio Plantarum, vol. 5. Stutgardiae: Sumtibus J. G. Cottae.
54. Li, H. 1984. The phylogeny of the genus Paris. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 6: 351-362.
55. _. 1998. The Genus Paris (Trilliaceae). Beijing: Science Press.
56. Liang, S. and V. G. Soukup. 2000. Paris. Pp. 88-95 in Flora of China, Vol. 24, Flagellariaceaem-Marantaceae, eds. Z. Wu and P. H. Raven. Beijing: Science Press and St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
57. Lindley, J. 1846. The Vegetable Kingdom, 3rd Edition. London: Bradley and Evans.
58. Maddison, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
59. Mason-Gamer, R. J. and E. A. Kellogg. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Systematic Biology 45: 524-545.
60. Melchior, H. 1964. Liliaceae. Pp 512-524 in Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 2. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.
61. Mickevich, J. E. and J. S. Farris. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Systematic Zoology 30: 351-370.
62. Nolte, H. J. 1994. Flora of Bhutan Including a Record of Plants from Sikkim and Darjeeling. Vol 3, part 1, eds. A. J. C. Grierson and D. G. Long. Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden.
63. Rafinesque, C. S. 1819. Prodrome des nouveaux genres des plantes observés en 1817 et 1818 dans l'interieur des Ètats-Unis d'Amerique. Journal de Physique, de Chimie, d'Historie Naturelle et des Arts 89: 102
64. Rendle, A. B. 1930. The Classification of Flowering Plants Vol. 1. Gymnosperms and Monotocyledons. Ed. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Reveal, J. L. 1998. Comments on Art. 14, footnote 2: First place of publication for seed plant family names. Taxon 47: 851-856.
66. Rudall, P. J., K. L. Stobart, W-P. Hong, J. G. Conran, C. A. Furness, G. C. Kite and M. W. Chase. 2000. Consider the lilies: Systematics of Liliales. Pp. 347-357 in Monocots: Systematics and Evolution, eds. K. L. Wilson and D. A. Morrison. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.
67. Samejima, K. and J. Samejima. 1987. Trillium Genus Illustrated. Sapporo: University of Hokkaido Press.
68. Soltis, D. E., M. E. Mort, P. S. Soltis, C. Hibsch-Jetter, E. A. Zimmer, and D. Morgan. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of the enigmatic angiosperm family Podostemaceae inferred from 18s rDNA and rbcL sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1: 261-272.
69. _, P. S. Soltis, M. E. Mort, M. W. Chase, V. Savolainen, S. B. Hoot, and C. M. Morton. 1998. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: An empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Systematic Biology 47: 32-46.
70. Stevenson, D. W. and H. Loconte. 1995. Cladistic analysis of monocot families. Pp. 543-578 in Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution, eds. P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
71. Sullivan, J. 1996. Combining data with different distributions of among-site variations. Systematic Biology 45: 375-380.
72. Swofford, D. L. 1991. When are phylogenetic estimates from molecular and morphological data sets incongruent? Pp. 295-333 in Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences, eds. M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft. New York: Oxford Press.
73. _. 1998. Paup* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
74. Takhtajan, A. 1959. Die Evolution der Angiospermen. Jena: G. Fischer.
75. _. 1969. Flowering Plants: Origin and Dispersal. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
76. _. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants. Botanical Review 46: 225-359.
77. _. 1983. A revision of Daiswa (Trilliaceae). Brittonia 35: 255-270.
78. _. 1987. Systema Magnoliophytorum. Lenningrad: Soviet Sciences Press.
79. _. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
80. Tamura, M. N. 1998. Trilllaceae. Pp. 444-452 in The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol III, Monocotyledons, ed. K. Kubitzki. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
81. Thorne, R. F. 1992. Classification and geography of the flowering plants. Botanical Review 58: 225-348.
82. Watson, L. and M. J. Dallwitz. 1991a. The families of angiosperms: Automated descriptions with interactive identification and information retrieval. Australian Systematic Botany 4: 681-695.
83. _ and _. 1991b. Trilliaceae in The Families of Flowering Plants: Descriptions and Illustrations, http://muse.bio.cornell.edu/delta/angio/extra/index.htm. (note that this URL now points to the data referenced in the 1996 citation.)
84. _ and _. 1996. Trilliaceae in The families of Flowering Plants: Descriptions and Illustrations, http://muse,bio.cornell.edu/delta/anglo/extra/index.htm.
85. Watson, S. 1879. Contributions to American botany. I. Revision of the North American Liliaceae. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 14: 213-288.
86. _. 1885. Contributions to American botany. 2. Descriptions of some new species of plants, chiefly from our western territories. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 20: 352-378.
87. th Ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
88. Zomlefer, W. B. 1996. The Trilliaceae in the southeastern United States. Harvard Papers in Botany 1: 91-120.
89. _. 1997. The genera of Melanthiaceae in the southeastern United States. Harvard Papers in Botany 2: 133-177.
90. _, N. H. Williams, W. M. Whitten, and W. S. Judd. 2001. Generic circumscription and relationships in the tribe Melanthieae (Liliales: Melanthiaceae), with emphasis on Zigadenus: Evidence from ITS and trnL-F sequence data. American Journal of Botany 88: 1657-1669.