Comparative genomic hybridization as a new method for detection of genomic imbalance

Genetika

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 149-160

  Ostroverkhova, N B ^a   Nazarenko, S A ^a   Cheremnykh, A D ^a  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA SEQUENCE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NORMAL HUMAN; QUALITY CONTROL; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN CHROMOSOME; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; NEOPLASMS; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0036482776     PISSN: 00166758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Kallioniemi A., Kallioniemi O.-P., Sudar D. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors // Science. 1992. V. 258. P. 818-821.
2. du Manoir S., Speicher M., Joos S. et al. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains by comparative genomic hybridization // Hum. Genet. 1993. V. 90. P. 590-610.
3. Chang S.S., Mark H.F.L. Emerging molecular cytogenetic technologies // Cytobios. 1997. V. 90. P. 7-22.
4. Kallioniemi O.-P., Kallioniemi A., Sudar D. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization: a rapid new method for detecting and mapping DNA amplification in tumors // Cancer Biol. 1993. V. 4. P. 41-46.
5. Kallioniemi O.-P., Kallioniemi A., Piper J. et al. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors // Genes Chromos. Cancer. 1994. V. 10. P. 231-243.
6. Joos S., Bergerheim U.S.R., Pan Y. et al. Mapping of chromosomal gains and losses in prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization // Genes Chromos. Cancer. 1995. V. 14. P. 267-276.
7. Kuukasjarvi T., Tanner M., Pennanen S. et al. Genetic changes in intraductal breast cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization // Am. J. Pathol. 1997. V. 150. No 4. P. 1465-1471.
8. Tagitchi T., Cheng G.Z., Bell D.W. et al. Combined chromosome microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization detect multiple sites of amplified DNA in a human lung carcinoma cell line // Genes Chromos. Cancer. 1997. V. 20. P. 208-212.
9. Testa J.R., Liu Z., Feder M. et al. Advances in the analysis of chromosome alterations in human lung carcinomas // Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 1997. V. 95. P. 20-32.
10. Zitzelsberger H., Lehmann L., Werner M., Bauchinger M. Comparative genomic hybridization for the analysis of chromosomal imbalances in solid tumours and haematological malignancies // Histochrm. Cell Biol. 1997. V. 108. P. 403-417.
11. Moore E., Magee H., Cjyne J. et al. Widespread chromosomal abnormalities in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Comparative genomic hybridization study of pure high-grade DCIS // J. Pathol. 1999. V. 187. P. 403-409.
12. Sigl E., Behmel A., Henn T. et al. Cytogenetic and CGH studies of four neuroendocrine tumors and tumor-derived cell lines of a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 // Internat. J. Oncology. 1999. V. 15. P. 41-51.
13. Speicher M.R., du-Manoir S., Schrock E. et al. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded solid tumors by comparative genomic hybridization after universal DNA-amplification // Hum. Mol. Genet. 1993. V. 2. P. 1907-1914.
14. Houldsworth J., Chaganti R.S.K. Comparative genomic hybridization: an overview // Am. J. Pathol. 1994. V. 145. P. 1253-1260.
15. Hermsen M.A.J.A., Meijer G.A., Baak J.P.A. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization: a new tool in cancer pathology // Hum. Pathol. 1996. V. 27. P. 342-349.
16. Forozan F., Karhu R., Kononen J. et al. Genome screening by comparative genomic hybridization // Trends Genet. 1997. V. 13. No 10. P. 405-409.
17. James L.A. Comparative genomic hybridization as a tool in tumour cytogenetics // J. Pathol. 1999. V. 187. P. 385-395.
18. Bryndorf T., Kirchhoff M., Rose H. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization in clinical cytogenetics // Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1995. V. 57. P. 1211-1220.
19. Erdel M., Duba H.-C., Verdorfer I. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization reveals a partial de novo trisomy 6q23-qter in an infant with congenital malformations: deliniation of the phenotype // Hum. Genet. 1997. V. 99. P. 596-601.
20. Levy B., Gershin I.F., Desnick R.J. et al. Characterization of a de novo unbalanced chromosome rearrangement by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization // Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1997. V. 76. P. 68-71.
21. Yu L.-C., Moore II D.H., Magrane G. et al. Objective aneuploidy detection for fetal and neonatal screening using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) // Cytometry. 1997. V. 28. P. 191-197.
22. Benzacken B., Lapierre J.M., Siffroi J.P. et al. Identification and characterization of a de novo partial trisomy 10p by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) // Clin. Genet. 1998. V. 54. P. 334-340.
23. Daniely M., Aviram-Goldring A., Barkai G., Goldman B. Detection of chromosomal aberration in fetuses arising from recurrent spontaneous abortion by comparative genomic hybridization // Hum. Reproduction. 1998. V. 13. No. 4. P. 805-809.
24. Griffin D.K., Sanoudou D., Adamski E. et al. Chromosome specific comparative genomic hybridization for determining the origin of intrachromosomal duplication // J. Med. Genet. 1998. V. 35. P. 37-41.
25. Nacheva E.P., Grace C.D., Bittner M. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization: a comparison with molecular and cytogenetic analysis // Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 1998. V. 100. P. 93-105.
26. Breen C.J., Barton L., Carey A. et al. Applications of comparative genomic hybridization in constitutional chromosome studies // J. Med. Genet. 1999. V. 36. P. 511-517.
27. Daniely M., Barkai G., Goldman B., Aviram-Goldring A. Detection of numerical chromosome aberrations by comparative genomic hybridization // Prenat. Diagn. 1999. V. 19. P. 100-104.
28. Lestou V.S., Lomax B.L., Barrett I.J., Kalousek D.K. Screening of human placentas for chromosomal mosaicism using comparative genomic hybridization // Teratology. 1999. V. 59. P. 325-330.
29. Voullaire L., Wilton L., Slater H., Williamson R. Detection of aneuploidy in single cell using comparative genomic hybridization // Prenat. Diagn. 1999. V. 19. P. 846-851.
30. Wells D., Sherlock J.K., Handyside A.H., Delhanty J.D.A. Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridization // Nucl. Acids Res. 1999. V. 27. P. 1214-1218.
31. Lomax B., Tang S., Separovic E. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions // Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000. V. 66. P. 1516-1521.
32. du Manoir S., Schrock E., Bentz M. et al. Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization // Cytometry. 1995. V. 19. P. 27-41.
33. Karhu R., Kahkonen M., Kuukasjarvi T et al. Quality control of CGH: impact of metaphase chromosomes and the dynamic range of hybridization // Cytometry. 1997. V. 28. P. 198-205.
34. du Manoir S., Kallioniemi O.-P., Lichter P. et al. Hardware and software requirements for quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization // Cytometry. 1995. V. 19. P. 4-9.
35. Piper J., Rutovitz D., Sugar D. et al. Computer Image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization // Cytometry. 1995. V. 19. P. 10-26.
36. Kirchhoff M., Gerdes T., Rose H. et al. Detection of chromosomal gains and losses in comparative genomic hybridization analysis based on standard reference intervals // Cytometry. 1998. V. 31. P. 163-173.
37. Rooney D.E., Czepulkowski B.N. Human Cytogenetics: A Practical Approach. N.Y.: Oxford Univ. Press, 1992. V. 1. 274 p.
38. Sambrook J., Fritsch E.F., Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edn. N.Y.: Cold Spring Lab. Press, 1989. 479 p.
39. Ghazvini S., Char D.H., Kroll S. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded uveal melanomas // Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 1996. V. 90. P. 95-101.
40. Telenius H., Carter N.P., Bebb C.E. et al. Degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer // Genomics. 1992. V. 13. P. 718-725.
41. Kuukasjarvi T., Tanner M., Pennanen S. et al. Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridization // Genes Chrom. Cancer. 1997. V. 18. P. 94-101.
42. Rosenberg C., van Gijlswijk R.P.M., Vos C.B.J. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization with lissamine- and fluorescein-labeled nucleotides // Cytometry. 1998. V. 32. P. 337-341.
43. de Meulemeester M., Vink A., Jakobs M. et al. The application of microwave denaturation in comparative genomic hybridization // Genetic Analysis. 1996. V. 13. P. 129-133.
44. Ried T., Liyanage M., du Manoir S. et al. Tumor cytogenetics revisited: comparative genomic hybridization and spectral karyotyping // J. Mol. Med. 1997. V. 75. P. 801-814.
45. Karhu R., Rummukainen J., Lorch T., Isola J. Four-color CGH: a new method for quality control of comparative genomic hybridization // Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1999. V. 24. P. 112-118.
46. Roth K., Wolf G., Dietel M., Petersen I. Image analysis for comparative genomic hybridization based on a karyotyping program for windows // Analyt. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 1997. V. 19. P. 461-474.
47. Moore D.H.H., Pallavicini M., Cher M.L. et al. A t-statistic for objective interpretation of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) profiles // Cytometry. 1997. V. 28. P. 183-190.
48. Tirkkonen M., Kurhu R., Kallioniemi O.-P., Isola J. Evaluation of camera requirements for comparative genomic hybridization // Cytometry. 1996. V. 25. P. 394-398.
49. Thompson C.T., Gray M.D., Gray J.W. Cytogenetic profiling using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) // J. Cell. Biochem. 1993. V. 17G. P. 139-143.
50. van Dekken H., Rosenberg C., Krijtenburg P.J., Alers J.C. Interphase cytogenetics and comparative genomic hybridization of human epithelial cancers and precursor lesions // Histochem. Cell Biol. 1997. V. 108. P. 419-430.
51. Parente F., Gaudray P., Carle G.F., Turc-Carel C. Experimental assessment of the detection limit of genomic amplification by comparative genomic hybridization CGH // Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1997. V. 78. P. 65-68.
52. Bentz M., Plesch A., Stilgenbauer S. et al. Minimal sizes of deletions detected by comparative genomic hybridization // Genes Chromos. Cancer. 1998. V. 21. P. 172-175.
53. Solinas-Toldo S., Lampel S., Stilgenbauer S. et al. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization biochips to screen for genomic imbalances // Genes Chromos. Cancer. 1997. V. 20. P. 399-407.
54. Lampel S., Nessling M., Soder A. et al. Matrix-CGH allows a fully automated analysis of genetic imbalances in B-CLL // Medgen. 2000. V. 12. P. 95-99.
55. Pinkel D., Segraves R., Sugar D. et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays // Nature Genetics. 1998. V. 20. P. 207-211.
56. Kraus J., Weber R.G., Cremer M. et al. High-resolution comparative hybridization to combed DNA fibers // Hum. Genet. 1997. V. 99. P. 374-380.