Connections and Critique: Feminist Pedagogy and Science Teacher Education

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 897-918

  Richmond, Gail ^a   Howes, Elaine ^b   Kurth, Lori ^a   Hazelwood, Constanza ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042083652     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199810)35:8<897::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-P     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Anderson, C. W. (1991). Policy implicaitons of research on science teaching and teachers' knowledge. In M.M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teaching academic subjects to diverse learners (pp. 5-30). New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Ayers, W. (1992). Teachers' stories: Autobiography and inquiry. In W. Ross, J. Cornett, & G. McCutcheon (Eds.), Teacher personal theorizing: Connecting curriculum (pp. 35-49). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5. Bleier, R. (Ed.) (1986). Feminist approaches to science. New York: Pergamon.
6. Brickhouse, N. (1994). Bringing in the outsiders: Reshaping the sciences of the future. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26, 173-188.
7. Cohen, D., & Barnes, C. (1993). Pedagogy and policy. In D. Cohen, M. McLaughlin, & J. Talbert (Eds.). Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280-298.
9. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S.F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: Are-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261-296.
10. Greene, M. (1992). Foreword. In Gore, J., & Luke, C. (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
11. Grumet, M. (1992). Existential and phenomenological foundations of autobiographical methods. In: W. F. Pinar & W. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed Text (pp. 28-43). New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
13. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
14. Hasbach, C. (1995). The house that feminist imagination builds: Loving presence developing a community of critical friends in teacher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
15. Hazelwood, C. (1996). Latinas' participation in school science. Unpublished dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
16. Hazelwood, C., & Roth, K. (1992). Gender and discourse: The unfolding living text of a science lesson (Elementary Subjects Center Series). East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.
17. Helms, J. (in press). Science - and me: Subject matter and identity in secondary school science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
18. Hubbard, R., & Wald, E. (1993). Exploding the gene myth. Boston: Beacon Press.
19. Hubbard, R. (1989). Science, facts and feminism. In Tuana, N. (Ed.), Science and feminism (pp. 119-131). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
20. Keller, E.F. (1983). A feeling for the organism. New York: W.H. Freeman.
21. Keller, E.F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
22. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465-491.
23. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
24. Longino H. (1989). Can there be a feminist science? In Tuana, N. (Ed.), Science and feminism (pp. 45-57). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
25. MacIntosh, P. (1980). Feeling like a fraud. Stone Center occasional paper. Wellesley, MA: Center for Research on Women.
26. McDiarmid, G.W. (1992). The arts and sciences as preparation for teaching (Issue Paper 92-3). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
27. McGrayne, S.B. (1993). Nobel Prize women in science. New York: Birch Lane Press.
28. Meier, D. (1995). The power of their ideas. Boston: Beacon Press.
29. National Research Council. (1994). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30. Pinar, W., & Reynolds, W. (Eds.) (1992). Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text. New York: Teachers College Press.
31. Rodriguez, A.J. (1997). The dangerous discourse of invisibility: A critique of the National Research Council's National Science Education Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 19-38.
32. Rosser, S. (1986). Teaching science and health from a feminist perspective. New York: Pergamon Press.
33. Rosser, S. (1990). Female-friendly science: Applying women's studies methods and theories to attract students. New York: Pergamon Press.
34. Schiebinger, L. (1989). The mind has no sex? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
35. Smith, D. (1989). The everyday world as problematic. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
36. Watson, J.D. (1968). The double helix. New York: Penguin.
37. Weis, L. (1988). Class, race and gender in American education. Albany: State University of New York Press.