Biases in maximum likelihood and parsimony: A simulation approach to a 10-taxon case

Cladistics

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 266-281

  Pol, Diego ^a   Siddall, Mark E ^b  

^a Division of Paleontology   (United States)

^b DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035722246     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/clad.2001.0172     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Testing phylogenetic approaches with empirical data, as illustrated with the parsimony method
2. Topological bias and inconsistency of maximum likelihood using wrong models
3. Inconsistency of evolutionary tree topology reconstruction methods when substitution rates vary across characters
4. Assessing molecular phylogenies
5. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis
6. Likelihood and inconsistency
7. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading
8. Success of maximum likelihood phylogeny inference in the four-taxon case
9. Dating of the human - Ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA
10. Spectral analysis of phylogenetic data
11. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case
12. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation
13. Is the Felsenstein zone a fly trap?
14. Systematic bias in phylogenetic analysis: Is the Strepsiptera problem solved?
15. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case
16. Evolution of protein molecules
17. Improving the accuracy of phylogenetic estimation by combining different methods
18. Large-scale phylogenies and measuring the performance of phylogenetic estimators
19. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates
20. Escaping from the Felsenstein zone by detecting long branches in phylogenetic data
21. Branch length heterogeneity leads to nonindependent branch length estimates and can decrease the efficiency of methods of phylogenetic inference
22. Assessing molecular phylogenies
23. Phylogeny of eukaryotes based on ribosomal RNA: Long-branch attraction and models of sequence evolution
24. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny
25. Error, bias, and long-branch attraction in data for two chloroplast photosystem genes in seed plants
26. Success of parsimony in the four-taxon case: Long-branch repulsion by likelihood in the Farris zone
27. Long-branch abstractions
28. Long-branch attraction and the rDNA model of early eukaryotic evolution
29. Are guinea pigs rodents? The importance of adequate models in molecular phylogenetics
30. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used
31. Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site
32. War of the iguanas: Conflicting molecular and morphological phylogenies and long-branch attraction in iguanid lizards
33. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods
34. How often do wrong models produce better phylogenies?