Vertical neglect: Behavioral and electrophysiological data

Cortex

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 679-688

  Pitzalis, Sabrina ^a,c   Spinelli, Donatella ^a,b   Zoccolotti, Pierluigi ^a  

^a IRCCS FONDAZIONE SANTA LUCIA   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE;

EID: 0031437039     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70725-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ALBERT, M.L. A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology, 23: 658-664, 1973.
2. ANGELELLI, P., DE LUCA, M., and SPINELLI, D. Early visual processing in neglect patients: a study with steady-state VEPs. Neuropsychologia, 34: 1151-1157, 1996.
3. BENDER, M.B., and TEUBER, H.L. Spatial organization of visual perception following injury to the brain. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 59: 39-62, 1948.
4. BISIACH, E., and VALLAR, G. Hemineglect in Humans. In F. Boller and J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988, Vol. 1, pp. 195-222.
5. BUTTER, C.M., EVANS, J., KIRSCH, N., and KEWMAN, D. Altitudinal neglect following traumatic brain injury: A case report. Cortex, 25: 135-146, 1989.
6. CAMPBELL, F.W., and MAFFEI, L. Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detector in human visual system. Journal of Physiology, 197: 551-566, 1970.
7. DESIMONE, R., and UNGERLEIDER, L.G. Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys. In F. Boller and J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989, vol. 2, pp. 267-295.
8. HALLIGAN, P.W., and MARSHALL, J.C. Is neglect (only) lateral? A quadrant analysis of line cancellation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11: 793-798, 1989.
9. JEFFREYS, D.A., and SMITH, A.T. The polarity inversion of scalp potentials evoked by upper and lower half-field stimulus patterns: latency or surface distribution differences? Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 46: 409-415, 1979.
10. LÁDAVAS, E., CARLETTI, M., and GORI, G. Automatic and voluntary orienting of attention in patients with visual neglect: Horizontal and vertical dimensions. Neuropsychologia, 32: 1195-1208, 1994.
11. LEHMANN, D., and SKRANDIES, W. Multichannel evoked potential fields show different properties of human upper and lower hemiretina systems. Exp. Brain Res., 35: 151-159, 1979.
12. LEHMANN, D., MELES, H.P., and MIR, Z. Average multichannel EEC potential field evoked from upper and lower hemiretina: latency differences. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 43: 725-731, 1977.
13. MARK, V.W., AND HEILMAN, K.M. Does fatigue account for left peripersonal neglect? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10: 335, 1988.
14. MARK, V.W., KOOISTRA, C.A., and HEILMAN, K.M. Hemispatial neglect affected by non-neglected stimuli. Neurology, 38: 1207-1211, 1988.
15. MERIGAN, W.H., and MAUNSELL, J.H. How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16: 349-402, 1993.
16. MORRIS, R., MICKEL, S., BROOKS, M., SWAVELY, S., and HEILMAN, K. Recovery from neglect. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 7: 609, 1986.
17. NICHELLI, P., VENNERI, A., PENTORE, R., and CUBELLI, R. Horizontal and vertical neglect dyslexia. Brain and Language, 44: 264-283, 1993.
18. PIZZAMIGLIO, L., JUDICA, A., RAZZANO, C., and ZOCCOLOTTI, P. Toward a comprehensive diagnosis of visual-spatial disorders in unilateral brain damaged patients. Psychological Assessment, 5: 199-218, 1989.
19. PORCIATTI, V., BURR, D.C., MORRONE, M.C., and FIORENTINI, A. The effects of ageing on pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potentials in humans. Vision Research, 32: 1199-1209, 1992.
20. RAPCSAK, S.Z., CIMINO, C.R., and HEILMAN, K.M. Altitudinal neglect. Neurology, 38: 277-281, 1988.
21. ROBERTSON, I.H., and NORTH, N. Fatigue versus disengagement in unilateral neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 56: 717-719, 1993.
22. SKRANDIES, W. The upper and lower visual field of man: Electrophysiological and functional differences. In H. Autrum et al. (Eds.), Progress in Sensory Physiology. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.
23. SPINELLI, D., BURR, D.C., and MORRONE, M.C. Spatial neglect is associated with increased latencies of visual evoked potentials. Visual Neuroscience, 11: 909-918, 1994.
24. SPINELLI, D., and DI RUSSO, F. Visual evoked potentials are affected by trunk rotation in neglect patients. NeuroReport, 7: 553-556, 1996.
25. SPINELLI, D., ANGELELLI, P., DE LUCA, M., and BURR, D. VEPs in neglect patients have longer latencies for luminance but not for chromatic patterns. NeuroReport, 7: 815-819, 1996.
26. VALLAR, G., and PERANI, D. The anatomy of spatial neglect in humans. In M. Jeannerodd (Ed.), Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Aspects of Spatial Neglect. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987, pp. 235-258.