Left unilateral neglect or right hyperattention?

Neurology

Volumn 53, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 2023-2027

  Bartolomeo, Paolo ^a,b,e   Chokron, Sylvie ^c,d  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^c Experimental Psychology Laboratory   (France)

^d Fondation Opthalmologique Rothschild   (France)

^e CENTRE PAUL BROCA   (France)

Author keywords

Reaction time; Right brain damaged

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEGLECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE;

EID: 0032763816     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.53.9.2023     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Heilman KM, Van Den Abell T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology 1980;30:327-330.
2. Weintraub S, Mesulam MM. Right cerebral dominance in spatial attention. Further evidence based on ipsilateral neglect. Arch Neurol 1987;44:621-625.
3. Marshall JC, Halligan PW. Does the midsagittal plane play any privileged role in "left" neglect? Cogn Neuropsychol 1989; 6:403-422.
4. Robertson IH, Halligan PW, Bergego C, et al. Right neglect following right hemisphere damage? Cortex 1994;30:199-213.
5. Small M, Cowey A, Ellis S. How lateralised is visuospatial neglect? Neuropsychologia 1994;32:449-464.
6. Kinsbourne M. A model for the mechanism of unilateral neglect of space. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 1970;95:143-146.
7. Kinsbourne M. Orientational bias model of unilateral neglect: evidence from attentional gradients within hemispace. In: Robertson IH, Marshall JC, eds. Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies. Hove (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993;63-86.
8. Heilman KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E. Neglect and related disorders In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E, eds. Clinical Neuropsychology. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993; 279-336.
9. Làdavas E, Petronio A, Umiltà C. The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients. Cortex 1990;26:307-317.
10. Howes D, Boller F. Simple reaction time: evidence for local impairment from lesions of the right hemisphere. Brain 1975; 98:317-332.
11. D'Erme P, Robertson I, Bartolomeo P, Daniele A, Gainotti G. Early rightwards orienting of attention on simple reaction time performance in patients with left-sided neglect. Neuropsychologia 1992;30:989-1000.
12. Bartolomeo P. The novelty effect in recovered hemineglect. Cortex 1997;33:323-332.
13. Bartolomeo P, D'Erme P, Perri R, Gainotti G. Perception and action in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 1998;36:227-237
14. Smania N, Martini MC, Gambina G, et al. The spatial distribution of visual attention in hemineglect and extinction patients. Brain 1998;121:1759-1770.
15. Gainotti G, D'Erme P, Bartolomeo P. Early orientation of attention toward the half space ipsilateral to the lesion in patients with unilateral brain damage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991;54:1082-1089.
16. Bartolomeo P, D'Erme P, Gainotti G. The relationship between visuospatial and representational neglect. Neurology 1994;44:1710-1714.
17. Albert ML. A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology 1973;23: 658-664.
18. Bartolomeo P, Chokron S. Egocentric frame of reference: its role in spatial bias after right hemisphere lesions. Neuropsy-chologia 1999;37:881-894.
19. Bryden MP, Sprott DA. Statistical determination of degree of laterality. Neuropsychologia 1981;19:571-581.
20. Karnath H-O. Deficits of attention in acute and recovered hemi-neglect. Neuropsychologia 1988;20:27-45.
21. Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL, Bradshaw JA, Nettleton NC. Residual rightward attentional bias after apparent recovery from right hemisphere damage: implications for a multicomponent model of neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57:597-604.
22. De Renzi E, Gentilini M, Faglioni P, Barbieri C. Attentional shifts toward the rightmost stimuli in patients with left visual neglect. Cortex 1989;25:231-237.
23. Mark VW, Kooistra CA, Heilman KM. Hemispatial neglect affected by non-neglected stimuli. Neurology 1988;38:640-643.
24. Fiorelli M, Blin J, Bakchine S, Laplane D, Baron JC. PET studies of cortical diaschisis in patients with motor hemineglect. J Neurol Sci 1991;104:135-142.