Spatial representation in the normal visual field: A study of hemifield line bisection

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 267-277

  Nielsen, K E ^a   Intriligator, J ^a   Barton, J J S ^a,b  

^a BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Hemianopia; Hemifield; Line bisection; Neglect

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEGLECT; NORMAL HUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0032964978     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00080-3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Albright TD, Desimone R. Local precision of visuotopic organization in the middle temporal area of the macaque. Exp. Brain. Res. 1987;65:582-92.
2. Axenfeld D. Eine einfache Methode, Hemianopsie zu constantieren. Neurolog. Centralbl. 1894;437-8.
3. Barton JJS, Behrmann M, Black SE, Watt S. Ocular search during line bisection: the effects of hemi-neglect and hemianopia. Brain 1998;121:1117-31.
4. Barton JJS, Black SE. Line bisection in hemianopia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1998;64:660-2.
5. Behrmann M, Watt S, Black SE, Barton JJS. Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: an oculographic analysis. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:1445-58.
6. Bender MB, Teuber HL. Spatial organization of visual perception following injury to the brain. Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry 1947;58:721-39.
7. Bowers D, Heilman KM. Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 1980;18:491-8.
8. Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC, Nathan G, Wilson L. Bisecting rods and lines: effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left side underestimation by normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 1985;23:421-5.
9. Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC, Wilson LE, Bradshaw CS. Line bisection by left-handed preschoolers: a phenomenon of symmetrical neglect. Brain Cogn. 1987;6:377-85.
10. Brodie EE, Pettigrew LEL. Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisections as a function of hand and initial scanning direction. Neuropsychologia 1996;34:467-70.
11. Carrasco M, Frieder KS. Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search. Vision Res. 1997;37:63-82.
12. Cavanagh P. Functional size invariance is not provided by the cortical magnification factor. Vision Res. 1982;22:1409-12.
13. Chatterjee A, Daiani BM, Cage RJ. Psychophysical constraints on behavior in unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychiatr Neuropsychol. Behav. Neurol. 1994;7:267-74.
14. Chatterjee A. Cross-over, completion and confabulation in unilateral spatial neglect. Brain 1995;118:455-65.
15. Chokron S, de Agostini M. Reading habits and line bisection: a developmental approach. Cognitive Brain Research 1995;3:51-8.
16. Chokron S, Imbert M. Influence of reading habits on line bisection. Cognitive Brain Research 1993;1:219-22.
17. Colby CL, Gattass R, Olson CR, Gross CG. Topographical organization of cortical afferents to extrastriate visual area PO in the macaque: a dual tracer study. J. Copm. Neurol. 1988;269:392-413.
18. Fiorani M, Gattass R, Rosa MGP, Sousa APB. Visual area MT in the Cebus monkey: location, visuotopic organization, and variability. J. Comp. Neurol. 1989;287:98-118.
19. Fujii T, Fukatsu R, Yamadori A, Kimura I. Effect of age on the line bisection test. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 1995;17:941-4.
20. Fukatsu R, Fujii T, Kimura I, Sasu S, Kogure K. Effects of hand and spatial conditions on visual bisection. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 1990;161:329-33.
21. Geldmacher DS, Heilman KM. Visual field influence on radial line bisection. Brain Cogn. 1994;26:65-72.
22. Harvey M, Milner AD, Roberts RC. Differential effects of line length on bisection judgments in hemispatial neglect. Cortex 1995;31:711-22.
23. Kerkhoff G. Displacement of the egocentric visual midline in altitudinal postchiasmatic scotomata. Neuropsychologia 1993;31:261-5.
24. Liepmann H, Kalmus E. Über einer Augenmaßstörung beu Hemianopikern. Berlin Klin Wochenschr 1900;38:838-42.
25. Maguire WM, Baizer JS. Visuotopic organization of the prelunate gyrus in rhesus monkey. J. Neurosci. 1984;4:1690-704.
26. Manning L, Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Individual variation in line bisection: a study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 1990;28:647-55.
27. Maunsell JHR, van Essen DC. Topographic organization of the middle temporal visual area in the macaque monkey: representational biases and the relationship to callosal connections and myeloarchitectonic boundaries. J. Comp. Neurol. 1987;266:535-55.
28. McCourt ME, Olafson C. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudo neglect. Neuropsychologia 1987;35:369-80.
29. Mulligan K, Sherk H. A comparison of magnification functions in area 19 and the lateral suprasylvian visual area in the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 1993;97:195-208.
30. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97-113.
31. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Kinsbourne M, Moscovitch M. Hemispheric control of spatial attention. Brain Cogn. 1990;12:240-66.
32. Roig M, Cicero F. Hemisphericity style, sex and performance on a line-bisection task: an exploration study. Percept Motor Skills 1994;78 115-20.
33. Rovamo J, Virsu V. An estimation and application of the human cortical facor. Exp. Brain Res. 1979;37:495-510.
34. Scarisbrick DJ, Tweedy JR, Kuslansky G. Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection. Neuropsychologia 1987;25:695-9.
35. Shelton PA, Bowers D, Heilman K. Peripersonal and Vertical Neglect. Brain 1990;113:191-205.
36. Tolhurst DJ, Ling L. Magnification factors and the organization of the human striate cortex. Human Neurobiol. 1988;6:247-54.
37. van Essen DC, Newsome WT, Maunsell JHR. The visual field representation in stirate cortex of the macaque monkey: asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variabilities. Vision Res. 1984;24:429-48.
38. Virsu V, Rovamo J. Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor. Exp. Brain Res. 1979;37:475-94.
39. Werth RH. Neglect nach Hirnschädigung. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988:102-31. Also see: Werth RH. Shifts and omissions in spatial reference in unilateral neglect. In: Robertson IH, Marshall JC, editors. Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, 1993:211-32.
40. Werth RH. Neglect nach Hirnschädigung. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988:102-31. Also see: Werth RH. Shifts and omissions in spatial reference in unilateral neglect. In: Robertson IH, Marshall JC, editors. Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, 1993:211-32.