Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulusmodulation of pseudoneglect

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 843-855

  McCourt, Mark E ^a   Jewell, George ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEGLECT; NORMAL HUMAN; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REFERENCE VALUES; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032991868     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00140-7     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Anderson B. A mathematical model of line bisection behavior in neglect. Brain 1996;119:841-50.
2. Anderson B. Pieces of the true crossover effect in neglect. Neurology 1997;49:809-12.
3. Angelelli P, De Luca M, Spinelli D. Early visual processing in neglect patients: A study with steady-state VEPs. Neuropsychologia 1996;34:1151-7.
4. Beringer J. Experimental Run Time System (Version 3.11), Berisoft Corporation, Frankfurt, Germany, 1995.
5. Bisiach E, Bulgarelli C, Sterzi R, Vallar G. Line bisection and cognitive plasticity of unilateral neglect of space. Brain and Cognition 1983;2:32-8.
6. Bisiach E, Rusconi ML, Vallar G. Remission of somatoparaphrenic delusion through vestibular stimulation. Neuropsychologia 1991;29:1029-31.
7. Bowers D, Heilman KM. Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 1980;18:491-8.
8. Bradshaw JL, Nathan G, Nettleton NC, Wilson L, Pierson J. Why is there a left side underestimation in rod bisection. Neuropsychologia 1987;25:735-8.
9. Breitmeyer B, Julesz B, Kropfl W. Dynamic random-dot stereograms reveal an up-down anisotropy and left-right isotropy between cortical hemifields. Science 1975;187:269-70.
10. Butter CM, Kirsch N. Combined and separate eye patching and visual stimulation on unilateral neglect following stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1992;73:1133-9.
11. Butter CM, Kirsch N. Effect of lateralized kinetic visual cues on visual search in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1995;17:856-67.
12. Butter CM, Kirsch NL, Reeves G. The effect of lateralized dynamic stimuli on unilateral spatial neglect following right hemisphere lesions. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1990;2:39-46.
13. Cappa S, Guariglia C, Messa C, Pizzamiglio L, Zoccollotti P. Computed tomography correlates of chronic unilateral neglect. Neuropsychology 1991;5:195-204.
14. Cappa S, Sterzi R, Vallar G, Bisiach E. Remission of hemineglect after vestibular stimulation. Neuropsychologia 1987;25:775-82.
15. Chatterjee A. Cross-over, completion and confabulation in unilateral spatial neglect. Brain 1995;118:455-65.
16. Chatterjee A. Dajani BM, Gage RJ. Psychophysical constraints on behavior in unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology 1994;7:267-74.
17. Chokron S, Imbert M. Influence of reading habits on line bisection. Cognitive Brain Research 1993;1:219-22.
18. Cubelli R, Pugliese M, Gabellini AS. The effect of space location on neglect depends on the nature of the task. Journal of Neurology 1994;241:611-14.
19. Damasio AR, Damasio H. Neglect following damage to frontal lobe or basal ganglia. Neuropsychologia 1980;18:123-32.
20. Drain M, Reuter-Lorenz PA. Vertical orienting control: Evidence for attentional bias and "neglect" in the intact brain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1996;125:139-58.
21. Driver J, Baylis GC, Goodrich SJ, Rafal R. Axis-based neglect of visual shapes. Neuropsychologia 1994;32:1353-65.
22. Driver J, Halligan PW. Can visual neglect operate in object-centered co-ordinates? An affirmative single-case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1991;8:475-96.
23. Efron R. The Decline and Fall of Hemispheric Specialization. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1990.
24. Fink GR, Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ, Dolan RJ. Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? Nature 1996;382:626-8.
25. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex 1988;24:321-8.
26. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Figural modulation of visuospatial neglect: A case study. Neuropsychologia 1991;29:619-28.
27. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Right-sided cueing can ameliorate left neglect. Neuropsychology Rehabilitation 1994;4:63-73.
28. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Lateral and radial neglect as a function of spatial position: A case study. Neuropsychologia 1995;33:1697-1702.
29. He S, Cavanagh P, Intrilligator J. Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature 1996;383:334-7.
30. He S, Cavanagh P, Intrilligator J. Attentional resolution. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1997;1:115-21.
31. Heilman KM, Valenstein E. Frontal lobe neglect in man. Neurology 1972;22:660-4.
32. Heilman KM, Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology 1979;5:166-70.
33. Heilman KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E. Neglect and related disorders. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E. editors, Clinical Neuropsychology 1993 3rd Ed. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 279-336.
34. Hier DB, Davidson KR, Richards EP, Mohr JP. Hypertensive putaminal hemorrhage. Annals of Neurology 1977;1:152-9.
35. Husain M, Shapiro K, Martin J, Kennard C. Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients. Nature 1997;385:154-6.
36. Jewell G, McCourt ME. Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 1998 (in press).
37. Julesz B, Breitmeyer B, Kropfl W. Binocular-disparity-dependent upper-lower hemifield anisotropy and left-right hemifield isotropy as revealed by dynamic random-dot stereograms. Perception 1976;5:129-41.
38. Karnath HO, Christ K, Hartje W. Decrease of contralateral neglect by neck muscle vibration and spatial orientation of trunk midline. Brain 1993;116:383-96.
39. Kinsbourne M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica 1970;33:193-201.
40. Kinsbourne M. The control of attention by interaction between the cerebral hemispheres. In: Kornblum S. editor, Attention and Performance II. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
41. Kinsbourne M. Orientational bias model of unilateral neglect: Evidence from attentional gradients within hemispace. In: Robertson IH, Marshall JC, editors, Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies. Hove, U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993. p. 63-86.
42. Laeng B, Butchel HA, Butter CM. Tactile rod bisection: Hemispheric activation and sex differences. Neuropsychologia 1996;34:1115-21.
43. Livingstone MS, Hubel DH. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science 1988;240:740-9.
44. Manning L, Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Individual variation in line bisection: A study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 1990;28:647-55.
45. Mark VW, Heilman KM. Diagonal neglect on cancellation. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:1425-36.
46. Marshall JC, Halligan PW. When right goes left: An investigation of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex 1989;25:503.
47. McCourt ME, Freeman P, Jewell G, Garlinghouse M. Mood and line bisection, (in preparation), 1998.
48. McCourt ME, Olafson C. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: Psychometric and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:369-80.
49. Mennemeier M, Vezey E, Chatterjee A, Rapcszak Z, Heilman KM. Contributions of the left and right cerebral hemispheres to line bisection. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:703-15.
50. Mennemeier M, Wertman E, Heilman KM. Neglect of near peripersonal space: Evidence for multidirectional attentional systems in humans. Brain 1992;115:37.
51. Milner AD, Harvey M, Roberts RC, Forster SV. Line bisection errors in visual neglect: Misguided action of size distortion? Neuropsychologia 1993;31:39-49.
52. Monaghan P, Shillcock R. The cross-over effect in unilateral neglect: Modelling detailed data in the line-bisection task. Brain 1998;121:907-21.
53. Mozer M, Halligan P, Marshall J. The end of the line for a brain-damaged model of unilateral neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997;9:171-90.
54. Navon D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 1977;9:353-83.
55. Nichelli P, Rinaldi M, Cubelli R. Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition 1989;9:57-70.
56. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97-113.
57. Pizzamiglio L, Frasca R, Guariglia C, Incoccia C, Antonucci G. Effect of optokinetic stimulation in patients with visual neglect. Cortex 1990;26:535-40.
58. Pouget A, Sejnowski TJ. Spatial transformations in the parietal cortex using basis functions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997;9:222-37.
59. Previc FH. Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1990;13:519-75.
60. Prinzmetal W, Wilson A. The effect of attention on phenomenal length. Perception 1997;26:193-205.
61. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Drain M, Hardy-Morais C. Object-centered attentional biases in the intact brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1996;8:540-50.
62. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Kinsbourne M, Moscovitch M. Hemispheric control of spatial attention. Brain and Cognition 1990;12:240-66.
63. Rico M, Graham N, Offen S, Scott W. Texture segregation in lower versus upper visual hemifields. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 1997;38:S639.
64. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW. The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 1983;21:589-99.
65. Rubens AB. Caloric stimulation and unilateral visual neglect. Neurology 1985;35:1019-24.
66. Rubin N, Nakayama K, Shapley R. Enhanced perception of illusory contours in the lower versus upper visual hemifields. Science 1996;271:651-3.
67. Ruchkin DS, Johnson Jr, R, Grafman J, Canoune H, Ritter W. Multiple visuospatial working memory buffers: Evidence from spatiotemporal patterns of brain activity. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:195-209.
68. Shuren JE, Jacobs DH, Heilman KM. The influence of center of mass effect on the distribution of spatial attention in the vertical and horizontal dimensions. Brain and Cognition 1997;34:293-300.
69. Soroker N, Cohen T, Baratz C, Glicksohn J. Is there a place for ipsilesional eye patching in neglect rehabilitation? Behavioural Neurology 1994;7:159-64.
70. Sperling G. The information available in brief visual presentation. Psychological Monographs 1960;74:(11, Whole No. 498).
71. Spinelli D, Burr DC, Morrone MC. Spatial neglect is associated with increased latencies of visual evoked potentials. Visual Neuroscience 1994;11:909-18.
72. Tegner R, Levander M. The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 1991;54:882-7.
73. Tsal Y, Shalev L. Inattention magnifies perceived length: The attentional receptive field hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996;22:233-43.
74. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJ, editors, Analysis of Visual Behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1982.
75. Vallar G. The anatomical basis of spatial neglect in humans. In: Robertson IH, Marshall JC, editors, Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies. Hove, U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993. p. 27-59.
76. Vallar G, Antonucci G, Guariglia C, Pizzamiglio L Deficits of position sense, unilateral neglect, and optokinetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 1993;31:1191-1200.
77. Vallar G, Bottini G, Rusconi ML, Sterzi R. Exploring somatosensory hemineglect by vestibular stimulation. Brain 1993;116:71-86.
78. Vallar G, Papagno C, Rusconi ML, Bisiach E. Vestibular stimulation, spatial hemineglect and dysphasia. Selective effects? Cortex 1995;31:589-93.
79. Vallar G, Perani D. The anatomy of neglect after right hemisphere stroke lesions: A clinical CT scan correlation study in man. Neuropsychology 1986;24:609-22.
80. Vallar G, Perani D. The anatomy of spatial neglect in humans. In: Jennerod M, editor, Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Aspects of Spatial Neglect. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1987. p. 235-58.
81. Vallar G, Rusconi ML, Bernardini B. Modulation of neglect hemianesthesia by transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1996;2:452-9.
82. Vallar G, Rusconi ML, Barozzi S, Bernardi B, Ovadia D, Papagno C, Cesarani A. Improvement of left visuospatial hemineglect by left-sided transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Neuropsychologia 1995;33:73-82.
83. Vallar G, Sterzi R, Bottini G, Cappa S, Rusconi ML. Temporary remission of left hemianesthesia after vestibular stimulation. Cortex 1990;26:123-31.
84. Werth R, Poppel E. Compression and lateral shift of mental coordinate systems in a line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 1988;26:741-5.