Approximal Caries Depth Assessment with Storage Phosphor versus Film Radiography: Evaluation of the Caries-Specific Oslo Enhancement Procedure

Caries Research

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 448-453

  Svanæs, Dagfinn B ^a   Moystad A ^b   Larheim, T A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Caries depth; Dental caries; Photo stimulable phosphor; Radiographic image enhancement; Radiography; Receiver operating characteristic curve

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTAL CARIES; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ADULT; AREA UNDER CURVE; BICUSPID; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0034323618     PISSN: 00086568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000016622     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Borg E, Gröndahl H-G: On the dynamic range of different x-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25:82-88.
2. Cederberg RA, Fredriksen NL, Benson BW, Shulman JD: Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:293-297.
3. Chotas HG, Floyd CE, Dobbins JT, Ravin CE: Digital chest radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors: Signal-to-noise ratio as a function of kilovoltage with matched exposure risk. Radiology 1993;186:395-398.
4. Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A, Gröndahl H-G: Observers' use of image enhancement in assessing caries in radiographs taken by four intraoral digital systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996;25:34-38.
5. Heaven TJ, Weems RA, Firestone AR: The use of a computer-based image analysis program for the diagnosis of approximal caries from bite-wing radiographs. Caries Res 1994;28:55-58.
6. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Jones C: in vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and Visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Caries Res 1994;28:363-367.
7. Huda W, Rill LN, Benn DK, Pcttigrcw JC: Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film fur dental radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83: 725-731.
8. Huysmans MCDNJM, Hintze H, Wenzel A: Effect of exposure time on in vitro caries diagnosis using the Digora® system. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105:15-20.
9. Janhom A, van der Stelt PF, van Ginkel FC, Geraets WGM: Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:6-12.
10. Molteni R: Loss of diagnostic information in digital images (letter). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:312.
11. Møystad A, Svanæs DB, Larheim TA, Gröndahl H-G: The effect of cathode ray tube display format on observer performance in dental digitized radiography: Comparison with plain films. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23:206-210.
12. Møystad A, Svanæs DB, Larheim TA, Gröndahl H-G: Effect of image magnification of digitized bitewing radiographs on approximal caries detection: An in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:255-259.
13. Møystad A, Svanæs DB, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Gröndahl H-G: Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental x-ray film. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996;25:202-206.
14. Naitoh M, Yuasa H, Toyama M, Shiojima M, Nakamura M, Ushida M, Iida H, Hayashi M, Ariji E: Observer agreement in the detection of proximal caries with direct digital intraoral radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:107-112.
15. Nielsen L-L, Hoernoe M, Wenzel A: Radiographic detection of caviation in approximal surfaces of primary teeth using a digital storage phosphor system and conventional film, and the relationship between cavilation and radiographic lesion depth: An in vitro study. Int J Paediatr Dent 1996;6:167-172.
16. Ohki M, Okano T, Nakamura T: Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23:77-82.
17. Price C: An evaluation of lead foil in dental x-ray film packets. Part 1. Factors affecting the intensity of back-scattered radiation and the effect of this radiation on radiographic contrast when density is allowed to increase. Br Dent J 1972;133:300-304.
18. Svanæs DB, Møystad A, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Gröndahl H-G: Intraoral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82: 94-100.
19. Svenson B, Welander U, Anneroth G, Söderfeldt B: Exposure parameters and their effect on diagnostic accuracy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:544-550.
20. Swets JA, Pickett RM: Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems: Methods from Signal Detection Theory. New York, Academic Press, 1982.
21. Tyndall DA, Clifton TL, Webber RL, Ludlow JB, Horton RA: TACT imaging of primary caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:214-225.
22. Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Platin E, Nair M: A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:113-118.
23. Verdonschot EH, Kuijpers JMC, Polder BJ, De Leng-Worm MH, Bronkhorst EM: Effects of digital grey-scale modification on the diagnosis of small approximal carious lesions. J Dent 1992;20:44-49.
24. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, Lobach SR, van der Stelt PF: Reduction in size of digital images: Does it lead to less detectability or loss of diagnostic information? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:93-96.
25. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, van der Stelt PF: Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry. J Dent 1997a;25:215-224.
26. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, Velders X, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF: In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997b;84:210-213.
27. Visser H, Krüger W: Short communication. Can dentists recognize manipulated digital radiographs? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996;26:67-69.
28. Wenzel A: Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:3-11.
29. Wenzel A, Borg E, Hintze H, Gröndahl H-G: Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: An in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:1-5.
30. White SC, Yoon DC: Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries. Denlomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:32-38.